Many waking up today to tales the trade and capital war are over and the pro-growth admin everyone hoped for is now here.
Markets are pricing in near certainty of this path when there are plenty of signs the admin's negative-growth policies are still firmly in place.
Thread.
Market expectations of growth ahead surged following the tariff "delay" announcement yesterday bringing stock vs bond pricing to levels on par with just before the election and reversing all the tariff-related pain from the last few weeks.
While tariff policies remain in place, the vast majority of investors are quickly inferring that even the tariffs that remain will be swiftly removed with nearly 80% expecting them cut by at least half within the next 90d pause period.
That's a notable reversal in expectations at a time when the actual reduction in tariffs announced with the pause are pretty modest.
While there is some significant complexity in calculating this stuff given the elasticity of previously untested rates, its still ~20%.
.@AnnaEconomist's work suggests roughly similar levels of tariffs under the new announcement. Certainly not looking like a big relief here.
Those estimates assume most Chinese tariffs are going to be hit at the announced rate. Assuming producers are fully able to route around those to other jurisdictions (hard at least for stuff on the water now), still looking at a 0.75% hit to GDP.
Even adjusting these figures down, when put in context with all the other negative growth policies being proposed, there is still a massive negative shock ahead if these policies aren't reversed.
That's a 2.5%-3% negative growth shock in the context of an economy that is only running at about 5% nominal coming into these policies.
While the media headlines and the market pricing suggest the storm clouds have fully cleared, the reality is far from that.
Even with quite rosy expectations, the administrations current set of policies is set to put the US into recession. A reality far from priced in.
Until there are signs of a far more substantial change in policy stance, at these market levels it remains far more appropriate to sell the rip rather than buy the dip.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seen rising toxicity over the 3yrs I've been active, accelerating post election.
Not just more trolls and politically motivated folks. Sad to see more large accounts focus on scoring points and ginning up mob attacks vs being collaborative & supportive (even with disagreement).
What was a vibrant community of interaction is slowing decaying to individual silos & marketing posts b/c its the rational thing to do. Everyone worse off for it.
Particularly the silent majority of folks who passively consume the content here and learn from the interactions.
I know it creates a feeling of superiority to join (or create) a tribe here & attack when others disagree or have been wrong, sometimes mercilessly.
But for anyone who cares about a vibrant fintwit community, those folks are a destructive cancer dressed up as 'accountability.'
A broad look at the inflation data suggests price pressures continue to rise as disinflationary benefits like housing moderate and price pressures from tariffs flow through.
Thread.
The US still has an inflation problem and the inflation impulse from rising tariffs is not helping the situation. Core PCE numbers reported a couple weeks ago remain almost 100bps above the Fed target and are set to march higher in coming quarters.
The CPI release brought our first read of official inflation data for July. A scan of other inflation triangulations suggests the inflation reality isn't looking good (even though expectations are contained). Will this translate into the actual reported data?
Anyone take a look at this Situation Awareness fund getting all the press? A client asked me so I took a look.
Claims 47% net returns YTD when 2 large 12/31/24 13F positions (MRVL & VRT) were down 44% & 36% and article claims limited short positions.
If you just take their 13F filings and estimate the monthly returns of their holdings you get something that looks like this below, which nets out much closer to 0% return YTD. Seems like an ok proxy since holdings didn't change that much over the quarter.
Portfolio definitely had winners in the 3/31/25 13F mix, but would have had to have way out of the money calls on INTC (making notional near zero value) and flawless timing on the winners (and/or lots of shorts alpha) to get close given disappointing 1Q picks.
Despite the political euphoria that's come from passing the BBB, netting out the impacts of immigration and tariffs under either current or likely policy suggests a negative shock to growth in coming quarters.
Thread.
Federal government policies are typically reactive to underlying conditions in the private sector and so while they can be important influences on growth, they rarely drive substantial growth pressures as a standalone.
The magnitude and direction of the policy suite from the new administration is relatively unusual - creating a large pressure on growth somewhat independent of what was happening in the rest of the economy (which was a pretty boring late cycle deceleration).
When most portfolios are long only, flexible strategies that can go short to cushion negative return periods are uniquely diversifying.
The challenge is finding cash efficient, low cost, positive return strategies that do it. Managed Futures run at 2x is an option.
Thread.
Allocators often face challenges designing portfolios that can help limit losses in down market environments. Despite the need, there are few investment offerings that perform well when other assets underperform but don’t have burdensome drag on the portfolio over time.
Some folks use buffer products, but those are often structured in a way that can limit upside. Others add out of the money puts, but that often results in meaningful negative return drag over time as premiums go unused.
For years the housing market has almost levitated despite drags from high rates and high prices thanks to limited supply and other assets financing demand. But in recent months that's started to flip.
The housing market has been much more resilient in recent years than most had expected in the face of very high rates. The biggest reason for that was that while buying demand dried up following the post-covid surge in rates, so too did supply.
In the last 6 months or so both have shifted to be more negative for prices. Inventory of new and existing homes have picked up while the slowing of asset prices combined with still high mortgage rates has caused buying demand to hit new lows.