Bob Elliott Profile picture
Apr 10 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Many waking up today to tales the trade and capital war are over and the pro-growth admin everyone hoped for is now here.

Markets are pricing in near certainty of this path when there are plenty of signs the admin's negative-growth policies are still firmly in place.

Thread.
Market expectations of growth ahead surged following the tariff "delay" announcement yesterday bringing stock vs bond pricing to levels on par with just before the election and reversing all the tariff-related pain from the last few weeks. Image
While tariff policies remain in place, the vast majority of investors are quickly inferring that even the tariffs that remain will be swiftly removed with nearly 80% expecting them cut by at least half within the next 90d pause period. Image
That's a notable reversal in expectations at a time when the actual reduction in tariffs announced with the pause are pretty modest.

While there is some significant complexity in calculating this stuff given the elasticity of previously untested rates, its still ~20%. Image
.@AnnaEconomist's work suggests roughly similar levels of tariffs under the new announcement. Certainly not looking like a big relief here. Image
Those estimates assume most Chinese tariffs are going to be hit at the announced rate. Assuming producers are fully able to route around those to other jurisdictions (hard at least for stuff on the water now), still looking at a 0.75% hit to GDP.

Even adjusting these figures down, when put in context with all the other negative growth policies being proposed, there is still a massive negative shock ahead if these policies aren't reversed. Image
That's a 2.5%-3% negative growth shock in the context of an economy that is only running at about 5% nominal coming into these policies. Image
While the media headlines and the market pricing suggest the storm clouds have fully cleared, the reality is far from that.

Even with quite rosy expectations, the administrations current set of policies is set to put the US into recession. A reality far from priced in.
Until there are signs of a far more substantial change in policy stance, at these market levels it remains far more appropriate to sell the rip rather than buy the dip.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bob Elliott

Bob Elliott Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BobEUnlimited

Apr 11
While the admin & the Fed have a lot of power to create a bond put struck not too far from here, they have almost no ability to control dollar depreciation.

With 15 years of US exceptionalism bets built up, the unwind we've seen in recent days is just getting started.

Thread.
This week the admin (kinda) blinked on tariff policy in part b/c the long end of the bond curve started to rise pretty rapidly.

The result is that many folks now are holding that there is a "Trump put" on the US bond market which will put a lid on rises much higher than 5%.
While the admin doesn't have direct tools to control the bond market, they do have the ability to shift policy in a way that can be supportive (cut spending, shift duration issuance, etc). Further the Fed always has rates and money printing at its disposal. The put is credible.
Read 10 tweets
Apr 9
US treasury market dynamics shifted abruptly the morning of April 4th, coinciding with China's retaliatory tariffs.

While no one knows for sure if Chinese efforts are driving the shift, escalation from a trade war to a capital war would have devastating consequences.

Thread.
For much of the this bear market treasuries have been trading a little soggy relative to equity market moves, but the overall trajectory looked pretty normal for a growth shock. Most negative equity days saw treasury yields come down.

But that dynamic changed last Fri.
That's when after business hours, on a Friday night of a holiday (pretty extraordinary time to make an announcement), Chinese authorities announced retaliatory tariffs on the US.

Since then US yields are up almost 50bps (and spiked to up 60bps). Image
Read 15 tweets
Apr 8
While the recent moves have been dramatic, equity markets are still far from pricing in a recession.

Thread.
Many folks are laser focused on the recent drawdown from peak as an indication that a substantial risk of a recession is priced in.

Even with this most extreme measure (given equity levels coming in) shows a substantially shallower move than meaningful recessions in the past. Image
Just looking at the drawdown chart fails to consider the lofty heights stocks started at coming into this period. Stocks are up 100% vs risk-matched bonds in recent years and the moves mostly reversed post-election euphoria. (vol-matched returns should be zero over time) Image
Read 10 tweets
Apr 7
There are no signs the new administration is willing to scale back their tariff efforts.

Typically a near immediate 20% decline in equity markets would cause policymakers to rethink their actions, but the new admin has shown no indications of any give yet.

Thread.
One of the most challenging things about this environment is that the recent market moves are largely a function of policy choice rather than a consequence of external macroeconomic pressures.

That suggests any shift away from these policies could create a significant whipsaw.
Usually policy is determined by (or at least constrained by) macroeconomic realities. For instance if inflation is high, the Fed is forced to hike, etc.

Here the policy move is entirely proactive. So its unusually important to see if there are any shifts that indicate a change.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 4
US trade partners initially measured responses to the raft of duty hikes earlier this week suggests most believe the tariffs are a transitory negotiating tool.

If these tariffs stick, it wouldn't take much retaliation to create a meaningful drag on US exporters.

Thread.
While the announcements on Liberation Day were extremely large, there remains a substantial risk that retaliation efforts significantly deepens the global trade war.

With US exports to non-USMCA countries running at roughly 5% of US GDP, even modest tariff rises would be a hit.
Coming into this most recent tariff war, the rest of the world was running economic tariffs about 3% higher than the US, with most outside of USMCA. The US rate hike of nearly 30% for these countries on Wed was many multiples of their economic tariffs.

Read 13 tweets
Apr 3
Yesterday was further confirmation of the Wrecking Ball mix of negative-growth policies and a slow moving Fed.

This should be good for bonds vs risky/growth assets like stocks, bad for the USD, and drive curve flattening. Similar to the market action since.

Thread.
I outlined the shape of the Wrecking Ball policy environment a couple of weeks ago and its market implications. Most importantly it's driven by a federal government that pursues negative-growth policies and is comfortable with equity market weakness.

The Liberation Day announcement yesterday only added further evidence that the administration is comfortable pursuing this path. Estimates of the all in new tariff rate are now above Smoot-Hawley at 22% blended mix, a 20% increase from the last admin. h/t @biancoresearch Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(