Eithan Haim MD Profile picture
Apr 10 14 tweets 5 min read Read on X
We had a hearing yesterday with the House Judiciary.

Never thought I would so thoroughly enjoy going toe-to-toe with these radical Dems.

Probably because it was like playing basketball against a bunch of first-graders.

This thread is a play-by-play breakdown. 🧵
Jamie Raskin, arch deep-state goblin, was one the first Dems to speak, then me.

I knew he was crafty but also predictable.

He would simply repeat false allegations from the first indictment, mention a grand jury, all to make me look guilty.

I saw it coming a mile away.
My opening statement was written to anticipate this.

While looking directly into Raskin's beady eyes, I explained how everything he stated as fact was totally false.

At this moment, on the other side of camera, his frumpy staffers went into a frenzy (seen in next post).
The paper shuffling and nervous sideways glances went into overdrive when Raskin tried to take on my attorney, Mark Lytle.

It was like an amateur rodeo clown stepping into the ring against a Spanish fighting bull.

Rodeo Clown Raskin ended up getting horned.
This is where you can see Raskin and the person sitting next to him freaking out.

They were frantically flipping pages.

I could literally see the sulfur-smelling sweat starting to drip from his eyebrows.

It was an amazing sight.
I also broke him the news that the primary component of DOJ's case had nothing to do with transgender patients.

Instead, transplant patients!

Textbook weaponization - criminalize pseudo-technicalities to make the case outwardly appear as one thing (i.e. transgender patients) but really it's about another (i.e. transplant patients).

I felt bad for Raskin at this point so I threw him a bone.
Raskin left these exchanges defeated, conceding my beliefs are "sincerely held."

To salvage a sinking ship, Raskin tried to call for backup with on HIS OWN witness, Bruce Lesley.

But Lesley would provide no assistance.

Raskin then changed subjects completely.

Game over.
Later Dan Goldman, tried to pick up the pieces Raskin left behind.

But even this veteran DC bootlicker tripped on his own malarky.

He tried a "got-ya" question but, just like Kamala Harris, entered a vortex of nonsense that resulted in unintelligible word salad.

I pointed this out and Goldman simply changed subjects - an acknowledgment even he had no idea what he just said.
But the Dems were bringing their big guns…

The rank-and-file "follow-the-science" scolds puffed up with their chests as best they could.

But they still didn't want to go head-to-head.

This is where Lesley came in handy - he provided them a way to deflect to a safe place.
A particularly contentious exchange was Rep Jayapal

She actually prepared with a clever line of questioning - a worthy adversary out of a classroom full of dunces.

She tried her best but at the end I landed a solid comeback - a response which she conveniently clipped out of her X post on the exchange.
Halfway through, the Reps left to vote on some bill.

After the break, Scanlon came back with a last ditch hailmary.

What ensued was the most epic takedown of the whole hearing.
Scanlon attempted to go after @V_Sivadge, deploying the overused Dem tactic of credentialism.

Her response was perfection.

The cameras didn't pick this up but Scanlon's faceplant was followed by audible laughter from the entire audience.

They were all laughing at Scanlon.
This is when Scanlon immediately recognized she'd been beat and that her line of questioning was insulting to the entire nursing profession.

She stepped onto a punji trap of her own making!

Like all the other Dems, she pivoted to Lesley when they started to look like fools.
Jokes aside, what the Democrats did during this testimony was manifestly evil.

They used allegations that were completely disproven in order to characterize me as a criminal, to destroy my family, and everything I ever worked for.

These people hoot and holler about " Our Norms" and "Our Democracy" but are more than willing to use the infinite power of the federal government to destroy the lives of innocent people.

The first chance these people get, they will destroy more lives. Trump and all the dissident voters must remain active in order to make sure they never return to power.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eithan Haim MD

Eithan Haim MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EithanHaim

Apr 15
Ever wonder who oversaw TCH's deception in March 2022 about shutting down their transgender program?

Well, it turns out, it's the person who got an award for it! Yes, an award - a very big award!

Afsheen Davis, TCH General Counsel.

Goes deeper than this. 🧵 Image
Image
First, worth appreciating the language about the award ceremony.

Davis helped TCH's "navigation of the complex legal landscape" about "transgender services."

Kind of like giving an award to Bernie Madoff for his leadership in navigating difficult financial times. Image
She also helped initiate the corrupt investigation into me - the person who exposed the deception.

During this 6/19/2023 meeting she served as General Counsel to TCH Chief of Surgery who gave egregiously false testimony.

Four days later armed agents showed up to my home.
Read 5 tweets
Apr 11
During the Congressional hearing, it was obvious the Dems were relying on @RepRaskin to take me down.

Nothing less than a bare-knuckle brawl.

He tried every trick in his dirty little book but this reptilian shell-of-a-boy stood no chance.

Worth a thread to break it down. 🧵
We all know one of the defining features of Raskin is congenital hypocrisy.

Combine that with a couple of decades of "petulant hall monitor" and you can understand his first line of attack.

Worth appreciating the monumental smugness towards the end of the video.
The Republicans could tell I was chomping at the bit to go on the offensive. I'm thankful they gave me every opportunity to do so.

This clip was my response.

(Important to know whenever I'm looking up and to the right, I'm looking directly at Raskin's slimy face).
Read 12 tweets
Apr 7
@JudiciaryGOP sent a letter to lead prosecutor, Tina Ansari, requesting her at a hearing April 9th.

They cite an "enormous conflict of interest" between Ansari and Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH).

Part of this story has remained untold. They're so close that now is the time. Image
The backbone of the entire case was testimony of a TCH doctor.

Best witness for the govt, worst for the truth.

Thus, I believe Ansari’s conflicts are more than a passive ethical issue; instead, operationally weaponized to find the right people to create the case against me.
We have to go back to the first indictment, May 2024.

Their case was built on one main witness-Dr. Larry Hollier, TCH's Chief of Surgery.

He led the DOJ/FBI to believe "an asteroid would have to hit Gulf of Mexico" for me to be operating/taking care of patients at TCH. Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 8
@BracewellLaw just hired Alamdar Hamdani, the former Biden-appt US attorney who weaponized his authority to try send me to prison for a decade for blowing the whistle with @realchrisrufo about TCH's secret pediatric sex change program.

It's only too ironic they hired him to handle "government investigations."

Let's take a trip down memory lane so Bracewell can better get to know the new partner their bringing to their firm.
During his time as US Attorney, he broke away from traditional DOJ practices and went fully rogue.

In his case against me, Hamdani bypassed the entire DOJ chain of command to run my case with a single prosecutor.

I know for a fact this is very atypical because my wife is an assistant US atty and one of the attorneys defending me, Ryan Patrick, was the former US Attorney for the Southern District right before Hamdani.

I imagined Hamdani was treating this case like an inappropriate office romance because he wanted to conceal this "government investigation" from his colleagues.

This is no surprise since it was the first time in American history the DOJ was using HIPAA not to protect patient privacy but multi-billion-dollar hospital systems - TCH and Baylor.

If you think this is bad, just wait until you see who he chose as the single prosecutor to run this case.

Great reporting about this one from @AndrewCMcCarthy.Image
Image
That prosecutor was Tina Ansari who is the top contender for GOAT when it comes to flagrant ethical violations. These were both personal - like threatening my wife - and potentially criminal - like practicing law in Texas with a suspended Bar license.

But Hamdani has a knack for choosing the right personnel for this kind of scheme because in the case of Tina Ansari the victims in the indictment - TCH and Baylor - were also the institutions which her family had deep personal and potentially financial ties with (Ansari pulled herself off the case after my attorneys informed DOJ of these conflicts).

So, not only did Hamdani pursue an unprecedented reinterpretation of HIPAA but chose a prosecutor whose family stood to benefit the most from the corruption.

Hopefully Bracewell has solid ethics attorney because those conflicts of interest can be a treacherous minefield.

Great reporting from @EdWhelanEPPC.Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Mar 7
The study showing worsening mental health post-gender surgery has been a bombshell.

The most remarkable detail has been missed.

The study was published by left-wing med students who unknowingly decimated the central premise underlying every transgender intervention. Image
First, consider other papers published by these authors.

Every article is a plug-and-chug of woke DEI talking points, mashed together with pseudo-intellectual jargon.

This shows they follow the golden rule for publication in academic journals - never question left-wing dogma. Image
Image
They abide by this rule in their mental health study.

They never question the validity of the surgeries - only that mental health support is needed AFTER surgery.

They accept the surgeries as self-evidently beneficial since they "affirm gender identity." Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 5
At President Trump's speech last night, I was sitting right behind the Democrats in the gallery.

I had a perfect bird's eye view of everything.

No doubt very dramatic for all of those watching but there was so much more the cameras missed. 🧵
Not only did the Dems not applaud or stand for the stories honoring average Americans but neither did their guests in the gallery.

Even for the most heartwarming moments most stayed seated, very few ever applauded.

It was heart-breaking to see.
During these moments I could see entire rows of Democrats staring down at their phones.

I was close enough to see what they were looking at - most were texting or scrolling through social media feeds.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(