We had a hearing yesterday with the House Judiciary.
Never thought I would so thoroughly enjoy going toe-to-toe with these radical Dems.
Probably because it was like playing basketball against a bunch of first-graders.
This thread is a play-by-play breakdown. 🧵
Jamie Raskin, arch deep-state goblin, was one the first Dems to speak, then me.
I knew he was crafty but also predictable.
He would simply repeat false allegations from the first indictment, mention a grand jury, all to make me look guilty.
I saw it coming a mile away.
My opening statement was written to anticipate this.
While looking directly into Raskin's beady eyes, I explained how everything he stated as fact was totally false.
At this moment, on the other side of camera, his frumpy staffers went into a frenzy (seen in next post).
The paper shuffling and nervous sideways glances went into overdrive when Raskin tried to take on my attorney, Mark Lytle.
It was like an amateur rodeo clown stepping into the ring against a Spanish fighting bull.
Rodeo Clown Raskin ended up getting horned.
This is where you can see Raskin and the person sitting next to him freaking out.
They were frantically flipping pages.
I could literally see the sulfur-smelling sweat starting to drip from his eyebrows.
It was an amazing sight.
I also broke him the news that the primary component of DOJ's case had nothing to do with transgender patients.
Instead, transplant patients!
Textbook weaponization - criminalize pseudo-technicalities to make the case outwardly appear as one thing (i.e. transgender patients) but really it's about another (i.e. transplant patients).
I felt bad for Raskin at this point so I threw him a bone.
Raskin left these exchanges defeated, conceding my beliefs are "sincerely held."
To salvage a sinking ship, Raskin tried to call for backup with on HIS OWN witness, Bruce Lesley.
But Lesley would provide no assistance.
Raskin then changed subjects completely.
Game over.
Later Dan Goldman, tried to pick up the pieces Raskin left behind.
But even this veteran DC bootlicker tripped on his own malarky.
He tried a "got-ya" question but, just like Kamala Harris, entered a vortex of nonsense that resulted in unintelligible word salad.
I pointed this out and Goldman simply changed subjects - an acknowledgment even he had no idea what he just said.
But the Dems were bringing their big guns…
The rank-and-file "follow-the-science" scolds puffed up with their chests as best they could.
But they still didn't want to go head-to-head.
This is where Lesley came in handy - he provided them a way to deflect to a safe place.
A particularly contentious exchange was Rep Jayapal
She actually prepared with a clever line of questioning - a worthy adversary out of a classroom full of dunces.
She tried her best but at the end I landed a solid comeback - a response which she conveniently clipped out of her X post on the exchange.
Halfway through, the Reps left to vote on some bill.
After the break, Scanlon came back with a last ditch hailmary.
What ensued was the most epic takedown of the whole hearing.
Scanlon attempted to go after @V_Sivadge, deploying the overused Dem tactic of credentialism.
Her response was perfection.
The cameras didn't pick this up but Scanlon's faceplant was followed by audible laughter from the entire audience.
They were all laughing at Scanlon.
This is when Scanlon immediately recognized she'd been beat and that her line of questioning was insulting to the entire nursing profession.
She stepped onto a punji trap of her own making!
Like all the other Dems, she pivoted to Lesley when they started to look like fools.
Jokes aside, what the Democrats did during this testimony was manifestly evil.
They used allegations that were completely disproven in order to characterize me as a criminal, to destroy my family, and everything I ever worked for.
These people hoot and holler about " Our Norms" and "Our Democracy" but are more than willing to use the infinite power of the federal government to destroy the lives of innocent people.
The first chance these people get, they will destroy more lives. Trump and all the dissident voters must remain active in order to make sure they never return to power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you want to understand the DOJ's investigation into gender clinics' fraudulent billing practices, best place to start is this Kaiser Health News article.
It tells the story of Tim Chevalier - a lady who believes she's a man who needs laser hair removal for a "phalloplasty."
Article starts by explaining Chevalier's insurance, Anthem, denied coverage for laser hair removal because it was "cosmetic."
It goes on to explain that "insurance companies, sometimes question mental health claims more rigorously than those for physical illnesses."
The article includes Johanna Olson-Kennedy, one of the trans industry's apex predators.
She endorses the move from ICD-10 (currently in use) to ICD-11.
Her reason is that gender diagnoses would "no longer be a mental health condition, but sexual health one."
Since "sexual health" diagnosis codes are considered physical condition as opposed to a mental health condition, the idea is that insurance would more easily cover the hormones and surgery that are part of "gender affirming care."
In a 2023 podcast, AMA and Harvard "experts" lay out the medical billing scam used for abortion.
This is same exact scam used in gender clinics.
They were warning activists of the massive criminal consequences of False Claims Act.
This reveals their greatest vulnerability 🧵
Notice the intro how they make very specific claims - so specific you could say they are suspiciously specific.
Like they know exactly what is going on and running cover.
Especially once you realize both are leaders in elite left wing activist networks.
Things get even more suspicious when they describe the exact diagnosis codes used to submit fraudulent abortion claims.
And now we know this likely reflects systematic criminality since gender clinics relied on false codes like "endocrine abnormality" and "precocious puberty."
Dr. Guyatt is a Canadian physician who was inducted into the Canadian Medical Hall of Fame in 2016 and is the founder of evidenced based medicine (EBM).
He actually coined the term "evidenced based medicine" in 1991 (original article - image #2).
A top Fed lawyer who oversaw my prosecution snaked his way to become the top pick for US Attorney in SDTX.
John Pearson presents as a "Republican" but under Biden, he transitioned to Leticia James.
His nomination to Cruz and Cornyn is imminent unless we do something about it.
I've spoken with people on the nomination committee as well as SDTX prosecutors who personally witnessed Pearsons's transition to radical left-wing sock puppet under Biden.
Now that he wants an appointment from President Trump, he pretends to be a staunch, conservative.
Pearson gloated to nomination committee that he signed my dismissal.
They were told Pearson had “nothing to do with” my case.
Impossible. He was involved, likely every step of the way. And he did nothing to stop it.
I outlined this in a letter I sent to Cruz/Cornyn’s staff.
I did a deep dive into Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson's dissenting opinion.
It's even worse than I expected.
Follow this thread to see for yourself. 🧵
Their main argument is that the law discriminates on the basis of sex since there are certain medications that make boys look like boys, vice versa for girls.
But that's insane.
These treatments are meant for diagnosable pathologies in order to restore normal physiology.
It would be like saying a patient without cancer but "identifies as having cancer" is being discriminated against because a doctor is refusing to give them chemotherapy.
They have the audacity to claim the majority opinion "contorts logic" while they rely on anti-logic.