We had a hearing yesterday with the House Judiciary.
Never thought I would so thoroughly enjoy going toe-to-toe with these radical Dems.
Probably because it was like playing basketball against a bunch of first-graders.
This thread is a play-by-play breakdown. 🧵
Jamie Raskin, arch deep-state goblin, was one the first Dems to speak, then me.
I knew he was crafty but also predictable.
He would simply repeat false allegations from the first indictment, mention a grand jury, all to make me look guilty.
I saw it coming a mile away.
My opening statement was written to anticipate this.
While looking directly into Raskin's beady eyes, I explained how everything he stated as fact was totally false.
At this moment, on the other side of camera, his frumpy staffers went into a frenzy (seen in next post).
The paper shuffling and nervous sideways glances went into overdrive when Raskin tried to take on my attorney, Mark Lytle.
It was like an amateur rodeo clown stepping into the ring against a Spanish fighting bull.
Rodeo Clown Raskin ended up getting horned.
This is where you can see Raskin and the person sitting next to him freaking out.
They were frantically flipping pages.
I could literally see the sulfur-smelling sweat starting to drip from his eyebrows.
It was an amazing sight.
I also broke him the news that the primary component of DOJ's case had nothing to do with transgender patients.
Instead, transplant patients!
Textbook weaponization - criminalize pseudo-technicalities to make the case outwardly appear as one thing (i.e. transgender patients) but really it's about another (i.e. transplant patients).
I felt bad for Raskin at this point so I threw him a bone.
Raskin left these exchanges defeated, conceding my beliefs are "sincerely held."
To salvage a sinking ship, Raskin tried to call for backup with on HIS OWN witness, Bruce Lesley.
But Lesley would provide no assistance.
Raskin then changed subjects completely.
Game over.
Later Dan Goldman, tried to pick up the pieces Raskin left behind.
But even this veteran DC bootlicker tripped on his own malarky.
He tried a "got-ya" question but, just like Kamala Harris, entered a vortex of nonsense that resulted in unintelligible word salad.
I pointed this out and Goldman simply changed subjects - an acknowledgment even he had no idea what he just said.
But the Dems were bringing their big guns…
The rank-and-file "follow-the-science" scolds puffed up with their chests as best they could.
But they still didn't want to go head-to-head.
This is where Lesley came in handy - he provided them a way to deflect to a safe place.
A particularly contentious exchange was Rep Jayapal
She actually prepared with a clever line of questioning - a worthy adversary out of a classroom full of dunces.
She tried her best but at the end I landed a solid comeback - a response which she conveniently clipped out of her X post on the exchange.
Halfway through, the Reps left to vote on some bill.
After the break, Scanlon came back with a last ditch hailmary.
What ensued was the most epic takedown of the whole hearing.
Scanlon attempted to go after @V_Sivadge, deploying the overused Dem tactic of credentialism.
Her response was perfection.
The cameras didn't pick this up but Scanlon's faceplant was followed by audible laughter from the entire audience.
They were all laughing at Scanlon.
This is when Scanlon immediately recognized she'd been beat and that her line of questioning was insulting to the entire nursing profession.
She stepped onto a punji trap of her own making!
Like all the other Dems, she pivoted to Lesley when they started to look like fools.
Jokes aside, what the Democrats did during this testimony was manifestly evil.
They used allegations that were completely disproven in order to characterize me as a criminal, to destroy my family, and everything I ever worked for.
These people hoot and holler about " Our Norms" and "Our Democracy" but are more than willing to use the infinite power of the federal government to destroy the lives of innocent people.
The first chance these people get, they will destroy more lives. Trump and all the dissident voters must remain active in order to make sure they never return to power.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@JudiciaryGOP sent a letter to lead prosecutor, Tina Ansari, requesting her at a hearing April 9th.
They cite an "enormous conflict of interest" between Ansari and Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH).
Part of this story has remained untold. They're so close that now is the time.
The backbone of the entire case was testimony of a TCH doctor.
Best witness for the govt, worst for the truth.
Thus, I believe Ansari’s conflicts are more than a passive ethical issue; instead, operationally weaponized to find the right people to create the case against me.
We have to go back to the first indictment, May 2024.
Their case was built on one main witness-Dr. Larry Hollier, TCH's Chief of Surgery.
He led the DOJ/FBI to believe "an asteroid would have to hit Gulf of Mexico" for me to be operating/taking care of patients at TCH.
@BracewellLaw just hired Alamdar Hamdani, the former Biden-appt US attorney who weaponized his authority to try send me to prison for a decade for blowing the whistle with @realchrisrufo about TCH's secret pediatric sex change program.
It's only too ironic they hired him to handle "government investigations."
Let's take a trip down memory lane so Bracewell can better get to know the new partner their bringing to their firm.
During his time as US Attorney, he broke away from traditional DOJ practices and went fully rogue.
In his case against me, Hamdani bypassed the entire DOJ chain of command to run my case with a single prosecutor.
I know for a fact this is very atypical because my wife is an assistant US atty and one of the attorneys defending me, Ryan Patrick, was the former US Attorney for the Southern District right before Hamdani.
I imagined Hamdani was treating this case like an inappropriate office romance because he wanted to conceal this "government investigation" from his colleagues.
This is no surprise since it was the first time in American history the DOJ was using HIPAA not to protect patient privacy but multi-billion-dollar hospital systems - TCH and Baylor.
If you think this is bad, just wait until you see who he chose as the single prosecutor to run this case.
Great reporting about this one from @AndrewCMcCarthy.
That prosecutor was Tina Ansari who is the top contender for GOAT when it comes to flagrant ethical violations. These were both personal - like threatening my wife - and potentially criminal - like practicing law in Texas with a suspended Bar license.
But Hamdani has a knack for choosing the right personnel for this kind of scheme because in the case of Tina Ansari the victims in the indictment - TCH and Baylor - were also the institutions which her family had deep personal and potentially financial ties with (Ansari pulled herself off the case after my attorneys informed DOJ of these conflicts).
So, not only did Hamdani pursue an unprecedented reinterpretation of HIPAA but chose a prosecutor whose family stood to benefit the most from the corruption.
Hopefully Bracewell has solid ethics attorney because those conflicts of interest can be a treacherous minefield.