Madi Hilly Profile picture
Apr 11 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
🚨 Just released: @RadiantEnergyG 's latest polling on U.S. public attitudes toward clean energy surveyed over 20,000 people across 23 states.

The most striking divide in nuclear energy opinion? Gender.

In our data, the gap between men and women’s views on nuclear power is larger than the differences found between political affiliation, age, education, or race.Image
Men's support for nuclear energy varies widely depending on factors like:

- Income
- Party affiliation
- Age
- Race
- Education level

But women? Far less-divided demographically. Across the board, they just don’t like it. Image
Image
Image
Image
To put this into perspective:

🔹 Net support for nuclear among Republicans: +26%
🔹 Among Democrats: +4%

Yet Republican women have lower support than Democratic men. That’s how deep the gender divide runs. Image
Many are quick to attribute the gap to a lack of information — or even widespread misinformation.

However, previous research testing the “knowledge gap” hypothesis suggests it doesn’t actually explain the difference in support.

I have my hypotheses, but without deeper inquiry, they remain guesses. Regardless, something is going on here, and it needs careful, thoughtful exploration.
Why does this matter? Because women make up 50% of the population. And public sentiment matters a lot.

Public opposition can derail new projects and force the early shutdown of economical, operational nuclear plants (as seen with Indian Point).

Policymakers closely watch public sentiment to gauge which energy policies are politically viable — and which are too toxic to touch.

Without broad support, even the best ideas can stall.
Big tech companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, and NVIDIA are starting to pursue nuclear power to meet the soaring energy demands of AI and new data centers. In response, states are overturning nuclear moratoria to position themselves for these investments.

But without broad public support, these plans remain precarious.

More work is needed to understand the factors shaping women's views on nuclear energy — and how to meaningfully engage with their concerns to build broader support.

Nuclear stakeholders and advocates can’t afford to ignore this divide.
Visit our website to read the full report, explore the data with interactive charts, see what people in your ZIP code think about clean energy — and try the survey yourself!

radiantenergygroup.com/reports/us-pub…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Madi Hilly

Madi Hilly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MadiHilly

Oct 2, 2024
America has a massive, unresolved waste problem at the Hanford Site in Washington with no clear end in sight

Here's what you need to know: Entry sign at Hanford Site, Washington. Photo Credit: TobinFricke, January 2005
When I write or post about nuclear waste, someone almost always asks, "What about Hanford?" out of curiosity or as a rebuttal.

In the past, I’ve defaulted to the standard pro-nuclear answer: Hanford waste is from nuclear weapons production, not nuclear power.


Image
Image
Image
Image
The concern/fascination around Hanford is not surprising given the way it’s talked about.

It's been described as:

“An underground Chernobyl waiting to happen"

"Arguably, the most contaminated place on the entire planet"

“A Poisonous Cold War Legacy That Defies a Solution” “A Poisonous Cold War Legacy That Defies a Solution,” The New York Times, May 31, 2023
Read 27 tweets
Aug 4, 2023
NEW: OPPENHEIMER AND THE END OF THE WORLD

Oppenheimer is a profound exploration of nuclear fear, offering clarifying insights into the nature of our anxieties and revealing why this fear seems to be unique to nuclear

Some highlights from my latest:

(WARNING, SPOILERS AHEAD) Image
NEAR ZERO:

The movie implies the existence of a very small chance that the world might've ended as a result of the Trinity Test.

In actuality “near zero” simply means non-disprovable – the inability to say something cannot happen through theory or observed evidence. Photo: Universal Pictures
INSIGHT #1:

Our deepest fears of nuclear exist in the realm of “near zero”. They manifest in fantastical scenarios with probabilities infinitesimally small and no definite way to disprove their existence.
Read 29 tweets
Jun 22, 2023
Yesterday, the same lawmakers in New York who frequently demand we Believe the Science instead went with Feels Over Reals, passing a bill to ban the release of wastewater from the shuttered Indian Point nuclear plant into the Hudson.

Here's what you need to know:
The wastewater in question is tritiated water — water containing trace amounts of a radioactive isotope of hydrogen called tritium.

Tritiated water is regularly released by nuclear plants as part of normal operations because the concentration of tritium is so incredibly low.
How low?

The EPA sets an annual dose limit from liquid releases at 25 millirem, & the Indian Point site has a more conservative limit of 3 millirem.

In 2021, the total possible dose to the public from Indian Point liquid releases was 0.011 millirem, 0.3% of the allowable dose.
Read 9 tweets
May 17, 2023
@RobertKennedyJr ran through the anti-nuclear playbook during his interview on Breaking Points.

While there were too many errors and confusions to cover in one thread, I’ll touch on the main points I took issue with. Let’s clear the record:

@RobertKennedyJr asserts that energy policy is written “to benefit the dirtiest, filthiest, most poisonous, most toxic, most war-mongering fuels from hell”

“[Polluters] raise standards of living for themselves by lowering quality of life for the rest of us”
Cringe aside, it's dishonest to look at pollution from energy in a vacuum.

Increasing energy consumption over time has coincided with greater levels of healthcare, education, democracy, security, & economic freedom.

Historically, these advances have been powered by fossil fuels
Read 20 tweets
Mar 20, 2023
@jackdarin – director of @SierraClubIL – claimed that the Sierra Club doesn’t support lifting the state’s ban on new carbon-free nuclear because “we believe that nuclear is not clean energy”

Frustrating to have to debunk this anti-nuclear talking point in 2023, but let’s do it: From "Future of nuclea...
@jackdarin says nuclear’s “full life cycle has very serious impacts”

@OurWorldInData studied the lifecycle emissions of our energy sources, including from mining, transportation & maintenance over a power plant’s life.

The data shows nuclear has the LOWEST lifecycle emissions. Source: https://ourworldind...
@OurWorldInData also studied lifecycle land use – not just the land for the power plant, but also to mine the materials for its construction and fuel, to connect to the electricity grid, and to manage any waste that is produced.

Nuclear comes in at #1, requiring the least land. Source: https://ourworldind...
Read 12 tweets
Mar 10, 2023
Illinois is *SO CLOSE* to lifting its ban on new nuclear

To get these bills over the finish line, representatives and senators need to hear from all Illinoisans that this is the right thing to do for our state

Alan explains exactly how to make your voice heard👇
RECAP: Illinois’s nuclear moratorium was passed in 1987 back when carbon was irrelevant to environmentalists.

Nearly 40 years later, we understand the need for reliable, carbon-free nuclear powering our state regardless of time of day or season.
The moratorium was passed under the premise that we had no solution to nuclear waste. But that's not true!

U.S. management of spent nuclear fuel has a perfect record on safety and environmental protection.

You can read more here:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(