Biff #SARSisAirborne 🍉 Profile picture
Apr 16 1 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🚨Call to action on Novavax & COVID vaccination as a whole:

The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) is meeting this week, and they’ve signaled their intentions to shift to a risk-based approach to COVID vaccines, to limit childhood access to COVID vaccines, and to recommend a bivalent COVID vaccine (now clear this is their game plan on continuing to sideline Novavax)

Here is the full livestream of yesterday’s ACIP meeting (04/15/2025):
m.youtube.com/live/dNCVr9AvF…

Here is the full livestream of today’s ACIP meeting (04/16/2025):
m.youtube.com/watch?v=zN4ACg…

CNN: CDC considers narrowing its Covid-19 vaccine recommendations:
cnn.com/2025/04/16/hea…

Here is a portion of the meeting where they talk about Moderna’s “new” next gen bivalent vaccine, mRNA-1283, which shows a very low efficacy of 38% and is the exact same thing that we already used in the 2022-2023 vaccination season with limited success:
youtube.com/live/dNCVr9AvF…

**Contact the ACIP members to voice your displeasure with the direction that the committee is moving.**

Helpful talking points:

1. Support to maintain broad recommendations for all ages, recommend updated COVID shots every 6 months, and that a risk-based approach is dangerous.

2. As shown in studies, monovalent shots are far superior to bivalent shots, and we’ve already experienced the shortcomings of a bivalent shot in the 2022-2023 vaccine season.

3. Novavax should receive full approval of their Biologics License Application (BLA), should be approved for pediatric access, and the shelf life should be extended to keep April doses on the shelves through spring & summer.

Here are the email contacts for the voting members of ACIP:
keipp.talbot@vumc.org
edwin.asturias@ucdenver.edu
ntb@unc.edu
olibro@aol.com
lchen@hms.harvard.edu
helenchu@uw.edu
Sybil_Cineas@brown.edu
denise-jamieson@uiowa.edu
kambojm@mskcc.org
kuchel@uchc.edu
Dr.Jamie.Loehr@gmail.com
bonniem@stanford.edu
moser@email.chop.edu
R.Schechter@cdph.ca.gov
albert.shaw@yale.edu
Karyn.Lyons@Illinois.gov
jzucker@health.nyc.gov
tracy.hoeg@ucsf.edu
tbhoeg@mit.edu

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Biff #SARSisAirborne 🍉

Biff #SARSisAirborne 🍉 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Biff248824

Jan 3
Quick 🧵on the current state of Iota-carrageenan nasal sprays: Efficacy, safety, Betadine shortages, buying options for US & Can. markets.

I-C sprays are the only option on the market that have a real-world randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study backing them up. 1/14
This study assessed the use of an I-C nasal spray in 394 hospital personnel dedicated to care of COVID-19 patients. Out of 198 to receive placebo, 10 infections (5% incidence). Out of the 196 to receive I-C, 2 infections (1% incidence). 2/14

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC84…
Other options, like Nitric Oxide (Enovid, VirX), Astodrimer sodium (Viraleze), ELAH (Covixyl), or Xylitol (Xlear) often appear promising, but to this point only have positive studies in vitro or positive studies that are not randomized, double blind, or placebo-controlled. 3/14
Read 20 tweets
Mar 23, 2024
@idea_alchemist Damn, so this is how I find out that I also had fakes because my last box is certainly sparkley as hell. 1st is old/likely legit, 2nd is today, 3rd obviously fake. Imo there’s probably a bit of variation, bc it looks like mine from today has maybe a bit larger holes than yours?
@idea_alchemist However, I’ve also had ones with larger holes in the past. Here’s the one today (middle) next to 2 old boxes of valved 9211+. The bottom I suspected of being fake, only because the box came without the usual instruction pamphlet. Sketched me out enough that I never used them 1/2 Image
@idea_alchemist despite 3M having the “safe guard” code on this model which passed on both boxes. And now I see that those ones also have much smaller holes (but no sparkles), while the top has larger holes than the one today. 2/2
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(