Thread by @TheChronology__

Biased Courts of India (Thread)

Indian Courts has repeatedly faced criticism for their bias against Hindus

Their Judgments are often lacking consistency and objectivity, with interpretations of Constitution appearing to be based on petitioner's religion

Let's expose them
1/18

When Congress brought Waqf Amendment Act 2013, many Hindu lawyers felt it anti Hindu and anti constitution and approached Supreme Court but Supreme Court declined to hear them and asked them to approach High Court

Supreme Court's response was very cold and rude

After 12 years when BJP brought Waqf Amendment Act 2025 then this time Muslim didn't like it and approached Supreme Court but this time Supreme Court's reaction was entirely different

This time Supreme Court didn't ask them to go High Court and started hearing on urgent basis

Non Muslim in Waqf Board

Waqf Board is notorious for garbing lands of Hindus and there is no one to listen Hindu side in Waqf board since all their members are Muslim so Modi govt brought provision of two non Muslims in Waqf Board to listen Hindu side, since Hindus are victim

But Supreme Court raised objection here

Surprisingly same Supreme Court in Vinod Kumar M.P. v. Malabar Devaswom Board (2024) case ruled that caste, race, religion, or language cannot bar appointments as non-hereditary trustees in temples

What an hypocrisy

Papers of Ram, Krishna and Shiva

New Waqf Amendment Act removed Waqf by User clause which says that any land which is used for Islamic purpose is land of Allah

Supreme Court said that how Muslim side will bring documents of 500 year old Mosques and Majars

So if they are using any place for prayer them that place should be considered Muslim's place and govt should not ask for document even on documents that land belongs to someone else

But same Supreme Court rejected same argument in Ram Janm Bhumi Case and asked Hindus to prove

that the land that they are demanding is actually belongs to Shri Ram

Hindu side presented Skand Puran reference, Edward's Pillar and Hans Baker map to prove that it was the exact place where Ram was born and won the case

Hindus have submitted scientific evidence in Kashi Gyanwapi temple, Dhar's Bhojshala Temple, Sambhal Harihar temple, Krishna Janma Bhumi but still same Supreme Court and Local Courts are not ruling in favor of Hindus

Seshammal Case (1972)

In this judgement, Supreme Court said that appointment of Pujari in temple is a secular function and appointments must not violate constitutional mandates against caste-based exclusion

Same Court is saying why interfering in Waqf Board appointment ?

Sabarimala Temple Case (2018)

Women are not allowed in Sabrimala temple, this is age old tradition of this temple but in 2018, Supreme Court interfered in internal matters of Hindus and struck down this tradition

After this many Muslim women also filed petition in Supreme Court

for seeking women entry in Mosque but Supreme Court didnt take this PIL as seriously as it take Sabrimala PIL

6 years have gone, case is still going on
Issue is still unresolved and Supreme Court not hearing this case regularly

A.S. Narayana Deekshitulu v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1996) and N. Adithayan v. Travancore Devaswom Board (2002)

Supreme Court itself has told many times that which practices are protected under Articles 25 and 26 and which are not and management of religious body

doesn't fall under article 26

Then why Supreme Court is raising question on appointment of non Muslim in Waqf Board which is a management body

Supreme Court should read its own older judgement but wait a minute those judgements were delivered for Hindus

Temple Control by Govt

In India, temples are controlled by Govt. Govt takes temple money and use it for secular purpose but Mosque and Church are completely free

From last 10 years, Hindus are begging to look into this matter but every time SC asks them to go High Court

Bad Animal Sacrifice, Good Animal Sacrifice

In 2019's Subhash Bhattacharjee vs. The State of Tripura and in 2014, Himachal Pradesh High Court by taking Suo moto cognizance, banned Animal Sacrifice for Hindus

Bakrid Goats say Hi to Milords

We have highlighted only a few instances, but there are numerous cases where the Supreme Court’s interpretation of Articles 14 (Right to Equality), 25 (Freedom of Religion), and 26 (Right to Manage Religious Affairs) appears inconsistent and seemingly influenced by the religious

identity of the petitioner.

As a result, the Supreme Court is increasingly facing mistrust from a significant section of the Hindu community in India, who expect the judiciary to uphold impartiality and maintain equal respect and neutrality toward all religions.

18/18