The US Wrecking Ball policy stance still has a long ways to go to before its reflected in asset markets.
Moves so far mostly have mostly just reversed the euphoria around the election of the new admin. It'll take much larger moves to reflect today's policy reality.
Thread.
For a months I've described the combination of the series of negative-growth federal government policies with a Fed that will be behind the curve in response as a Wrecking Ball.
That's because that mix is not only terrible for asset markets, but it is bad for the economy.
And I should note that this doesn't include the very real possibility of a more extreme tail outcome possibilities like loss of faith in the federal reserve independence, a capital war, or a kinetic war. Not something to bet on, but outcomes that would exacerbate these dynamics.
These impacts have yet to be really reflected in markets. Take market based measure of growth here. A short US growth portfolio of long LT nominals and reals and short stocks is merely back to where we were just before the election.
While there has been a lot of talk about foreign investors pulling money out of the US, particularly among our DW world capital partner, the dollar has hardly moved in any longer-term context.
And the reversal of the US exceptionalism trade has merely unwound moves from just after the election. A pretty big move over the short-term but only retracing a small part of the post covid move up until the election.
Gold is really the only asset that has had significant moves reflecting these dynamics, up 25% or so since the election. But still in the context of an asset that has in past times of stress doubled or tripled, these are pretty modest moves.
Taken together a "US Wrecking Ball" position mix remains vastly underwater relative to the start of 2020. While the moves have felt large up close, this mix is still only a couple percent higher than in the lead up to the election.
Hardly a scratch given the policy mix today.
In a high volatility environment you either have to be 1) extremely agile or 2) positioned in a way that is well balanced to reflect the larger trend.
It's very hard to do the first, particularly in size. The Wrecking Ball mix above is likely well positioned for the second.
Financial assets are still trading on high hopes that this policy environment will be short lived even as most signs indicate further entrenchment from all sides.
So while this mix has made for a good trade in recent weeks, it looks like there is still plenty of room to run.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Most investors would be far better off allocating to global macro strategies than trying to time macro market moves themselves.
Global Macro index alpha has a history as one of the most diversifying strategies for 60/40 portfolios, often shining in times of turbulence.
Thread.
These managers typically take long and short positions across major liquid currency, commodity, fixed income, equity index, and credit markets, looking for the biggest opportunities agnostic to geography or asset class.
This approach gives these managers the opportunity to generate alpha independent of the direction of the US equity and bond markets, decreasing the correlation to traditional long only strategies.
Business and consumer confidence has collapsed across the economy.
This is likely to have more far reaching impacts on the economy and markets than all this flip-flopping on tariff policy.
Thread.
In most economic cycles business and consumer confidence is a outcome of the macroeconomic dynamics rather than a driver itself.
That's because in most cases businesses and households operate within the constraints of their incomes & cashflows rather than their hope or fear.
But there is no reason why confidence always has to be lagging.
In rare circumstances these folks can make a *choice* to curtail their economic activities - and with it create a negative shock by slowing investment, delaying large purchases, cutting back on discretionary spend.
While the admin & the Fed have a lot of power to create a bond put struck not too far from here, they have almost no ability to control dollar depreciation.
With 15 years of US exceptionalism bets built up, the unwind we've seen in recent days is just getting started.
Thread.
This week the admin (kinda) blinked on tariff policy in part b/c the long end of the bond curve started to rise pretty rapidly.
The result is that many folks now are holding that there is a "Trump put" on the US bond market which will put a lid on rises much higher than 5%.
While the admin doesn't have direct tools to control the bond market, they do have the ability to shift policy in a way that can be supportive (cut spending, shift duration issuance, etc). Further the Fed always has rates and money printing at its disposal. The put is credible.
Many waking up today to tales the trade and capital war are over and the pro-growth admin everyone hoped for is now here.
Markets are pricing in near certainty of this path when there are plenty of signs the admin's negative-growth policies are still firmly in place.
Thread.
Market expectations of growth ahead surged following the tariff "delay" announcement yesterday bringing stock vs bond pricing to levels on par with just before the election and reversing all the tariff-related pain from the last few weeks.
While tariff policies remain in place, the vast majority of investors are quickly inferring that even the tariffs that remain will be swiftly removed with nearly 80% expecting them cut by at least half within the next 90d pause period.
US treasury market dynamics shifted abruptly the morning of April 4th, coinciding with China's retaliatory tariffs.
While no one knows for sure if Chinese efforts are driving the shift, escalation from a trade war to a capital war would have devastating consequences.
Thread.
For much of the this bear market treasuries have been trading a little soggy relative to equity market moves, but the overall trajectory looked pretty normal for a growth shock. Most negative equity days saw treasury yields come down.
But that dynamic changed last Fri.
That's when after business hours, on a Friday night of a holiday (pretty extraordinary time to make an announcement), Chinese authorities announced retaliatory tariffs on the US.
Since then US yields are up almost 50bps (and spiked to up 60bps).
While the recent moves have been dramatic, equity markets are still far from pricing in a recession.
Thread.
Many folks are laser focused on the recent drawdown from peak as an indication that a substantial risk of a recession is priced in.
Even with this most extreme measure (given equity levels coming in) shows a substantially shallower move than meaningful recessions in the past.
Just looking at the drawdown chart fails to consider the lofty heights stocks started at coming into this period. Stocks are up 100% vs risk-matched bonds in recent years and the moves mostly reversed post-election euphoria. (vol-matched returns should be zero over time)