🧵Autism rates have exploded, becoming a massive financial enterprise and while framed as support, the reality involves billions in profits. Let’s explore who benefits and how.
In 2000, CDC data showed 1 in 150 children diagnosed with autism. By 2023, it’s 1 in 36—an unprecedented 317% increase. Improved diagnostics alone can’t explain this growth.
Autism-related costs in the U.S. reached a staggering $223 billion annually in 2020, projected to be $589 billion by 2030. Expenses include healthcare, special education, therapies, and productivity losses.
Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) is the primary therapy for autism, derived from behavior modification theories. Despite controversies and comparisons to coercive methods, ABA dominates due to its profitability, structured around billable therapy hours.
Private Equity Dominance in Autism Care
Private equity firms have aggressively acquired ABA clinics, consolidating them into large, profitable chains. High insurance reimbursements and limited oversight attract investors aiming for significant returns.
“The flood of insurance and taxpayer money pouring into the ‘market for autism services’ has quickly flowed into the pockets of Wall Street financiers. Autism advocates won health insurance and Medicaid coverage for intensive autism services, especially Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), which is the most widely recognized evidence-based approach. The more intensive services, requiring more hours of therapy each week, allow for higher reimbursement opportunities compared to other approaches or to other developmental disorders.”
The ABA Therapy Profit Model
ABA therapy typically involves 20–40 billable hours weekly per child. This model encourages ongoing dependence, creating “lifelong customers” rather than promoting independent coping strategies.
Pharmaceutical companies profit substantially from medications prescribed for autism symptoms, such as irritability and anxiety. For example, Risperdal, an antipsychotic by Johnson & Johnson, is widely prescribed despite severe side effects.
Back in 2013 Johnson & Johnson had to pay $2.2 Billion because of off-label marketing of Risperdal.
“The complaint alleges that J&J and Janssen knew that Risperdal posed certain health risks to children, including the risk of elevated levels of prolactin, a hormone that can stimulate breast development and milk production. Nonetheless, one of Janssen’s Key Base Business Goals was to grow and protect the drug’s market share with child/adolescent patients. Janssen instructed its sales representatives to call on child psychiatrists, as well as mental health facilities that primarily treated children, and to market Risperdal as safe and effective for symptoms of various childhood disorders, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and autism.”
Autism Nonprofits and Corporate Influence
Organizations like Autism Speaks attract large donations but face criticism for high executive pay and limited direct service spending. In 2019, Autism Speaks’ CEO received nearly $1 million in compensation.
The Autism Impact Fund has raised $60 million specifically targeting startups focused on autism and neurodevelopmental disorders, highlighting profit potential beyond traditional healthcare.
Autism diagnoses are based on subjective behavioral observations, not definitive medical tests, increasing potential overdiagnosis. Diagnostic ambiguity benefits industries that thrive on treatment demand.
As previously referenced insurance mandates across all 50 states require coverage for autism therapies, significantly increasing demand and profitability. ABA therapy in particular has seen explosive growth due to these mandates.
Millions in NIH grants fund autism research, creating financial incentives for institutions to continue research cycles that rarely yield breakthroughs in autism causation or prevention. Since 2008 taxpayer funded research has grown from $118 million to an estimated total $330 million a year.
The major beneficiaries of all this money being spent and made isn’t the children caught in the middle of this grotesque profit seeking epidemic, it is the industry that has been built around them by:
•Private equity investors like Blackstone.
•ABA therapy conglomerates like Centria, BlueSprig.
•Pharmaceutical companies like Johnson & Johnson.
•Nonprofits tied to corporate interests like Autism Speaks.
•Academic institutions benefiting from continuous grant funding financed by taxpayers with little if any significant progress made.
Families face heavy financial burdens and stress, taxpayers fund expensive treatments via Medicaid, and autistic individuals risk long-term dependency on services designed more for profit than empowerment.
The Autism Industrial Complex operates on a cycle of diagnosis, treatment dependency, and profit maximization, often sidelining genuine, holistic support and independence for autistic individuals.
When factoring pharmaceutical sales and auxiliary support industries, annual profits likely approach $10–15 billion.
This is what I call Systemic Capture and it is undeniable. All this money for a disease that no one seems to know where it comes from but has a multi-billion dollar industry behind it.
Quite convenient and most of all profitable.
Thanks for reading.
Follow me @joshwalkos for more threads and info in the future.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
However a new peer-reviewed study funded by the U.S. government shows scientists engineering novel flu viruses with enhanced ability to infect humans.
They say it is for “surveillance” but as I’ll show it’s just semantic subterfuge.
Researchers took canine influenza (H3N2-CIV) and deliberately co-infected dog tracheal tissue with:
The 2009 pandemic swine flu (H1N1pdm) and the Avian flu H9N2 which is known for high cytokine storms in humans.
They then serially passaged the virus i.e. sped up evolution in a lab.
The result was “reassortants” or simply put, hybrid flu viruses containing gene segments from both parental viruses.
In their own words:
“The co-infection of canine tracheal explants by H3N2-CIV and H1N1pdm or H9N2-G1H led to a remarkably high rate of reassortment. […] All reassortants replicated with similar or greater efficiency as compared to the parental strains. […] The drastic enhancement in viral replication is concerning and implies a high potential of these reassortants to be introduced into the human population.”
Why yes, that is concerning considering they intentionally created new, viable flu strains with human infection potential by mixing animal and human-origin influenza viruses.
Designed to enhance transmissibility, replication, and potentially pathogenicity.
THIS GAIN OF FUNCTION
They:
1. Created novel viruses through intentional co-infection and passaging 2. Identified new phenotypes (greater replication and inflammatory potential) 3. Demonstrated enhanced infectivity in human cells
It checks the boxes laid out in the U.S. government’s own definition of gain-of-function, particularly as related to Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) policies, which are supposed to restrict research that could make pathogens more dangerous to humans.
Look at the scenario laid out in this report entitled “2024 National Blueprint for Biodefense”.
It presents a fictional but plausible bioterrorist attack occurring on July 4, 2025, designed as a narrative device to frame the report’s urgency and recommendations.
It’s essentially a dramatized worst-case scenario aimed at spurring policy action.
The setting is a fictional congressional joint inquiry convened in the aftermath of an unprecedented biological attack on U.S. soil.🤔
July 4, 2025 is chosen symbolically for maximum psychological and political impact.
Two days from now.
The attack is made with a genetically modified strain of Nipah virus that is engineered for high transmissibility and a 40%+ mortality rate.
It states that 280,000 human deaths occurred and 400,000 infections in one day.
There is also 200,000 animal deaths, indicating a zoonotic and agricultural biowarfare component and coordinated global attacks followed, killing tens of thousands in allied nations.
THE STRATEGY OF THE ATTACKERS
•They conducted small-scale trial runs ahead of time in various U.S. cities these went undetected.
•They leveraged a lack of preparedness, not just technologically, but bureaucratically and strategically.
•They exploited institutional complacency and false assumptions about the capabilities of state or terrorist actors.
Meet Susan Monarez, RFK Jr’s “handpicked” candidate to run the CDC.
She’s not a doctor.
She’s not a frontline scientist.
She is a biotech insider who’s spent 20 years building public-private partnerships between the feds and Big Pharma.
If confirmed, she’d be the first CDC Director without a medical degree in 70+ years.
Here’s what you’re not being told.
Monarez has spent her career not regulating industry but helping it navigate and exploit the federal health bureaucracy.
She’s been embedded at BARDA, DHS, the NSC, ARPA-H and now she’s poised to lead the CDC.
Blowback Nation: How the CIA’s Iran Coup Forged a Theocracy with Nuclear Ambitions
Operation Ajax – the 1953 Anglo-American coup in Iran – overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh, ending Iran’s brief oil nationalization. U.S. and British intelligence orchestrated street riots and bribed officials to topple Mossadegh, largely to restore Western control of Iran’s oil and to prevent a feared tilt toward the Soviet bloc.
The motivations were explicit. Mossadegh had nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (BP today), enraging Britain, and he championed Iranian sovereignty over foreign oil concessions. London lobbied Washington to intervene, framing Mossadegh as a potential gateway for communism in the Cold War climate . In reality, U.K. officials privately admitted Mossadegh’s government was broadly democratic and nationalist but London and the CIA resolved to remove him to protect oil interests and Western hegemony.
🧵Astroturf Uprising: The Billionaire-Funded Machine Behind the LA ICE Protests
The LA “protests” are being coordinated or backed by groups publicly listed as partners of No Kings, a coalition that claims to be about “people power” and “no more oligarchs.”
But almost all of their “partners” are funded by oligarchs.
Let’s start with who’s visibly involved in the LA protests:
•ACLU SoCal
•Indivisible
•Color of Change
•Black Voters Matter
•American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
•Communications Workers of America (CWA)
•Sunrise Movement
All No Kings partners.
All with deep-pocketed backers. This is just the tip of the iceberg but a good primer to understand how this world works.
Just look at all their partners, it’s a who’s who of leftist activists groups: