🇩🇪‼️Klaus Schwab leaves suddenly: An unexpected turn at the Davos summit‼️
Without fanfare, quietly and almost under the radar, Klaus Schwab retired. The man who has been the face and brains behind the World Economic Forum (WEF) for years has decided to step down – immediately.
Although he previously said that everything will go gradually, in his style decisions are not made without a message. And the message is clear: something is changing at the top of the global order, or at least it is trying to create such an impression. 👇
In a statement released Monday, Schwab, who will soon turn 88, said he is stepping down as chairman and board member of the WEF effective immediately.
The decision was made at an extraordinary meeting of the Forum on Sunday. His deputy, Peter Brebek-Letmath, the former head of the Nestle Corporation, was appointed acting – and unanimously. The official version sounds smooth. But beneath the surface, it has been brewing for some time.
Back in early April, Schwab talked about retiring. Not because of pressure, he claimed, but because of age. However, those who follow the currents of global power know that for such figures retirement does not come without pressure - either internal or external. 👇
The WEF has come under the spotlight in recent years, but not for climate panels or discussions about digital currencies. At the center of the criticism were ideas that Schwab advocated for decades, which in 2020 crystallized into something he called - "The Great Reset".
An ideology that shook the world
What put Schwab at the center of much controversy was his clear view that the world must be transformed. In the book "COVID-19: The Great Reset", which he wrote with Thierry Malreau, he presented a plan that sounded to many like a dystopian agenda: a world in which individuals will not have personal property, but everything will be rented, where human activities will be digitally monitored, and decisions about health, finances and movement will be made centrally - supposedly in the interest of sustainability. 👇
The phrase that has been bandied around Davos for years - "You will have nothing, and you will be happy" - has become a symbol of that narrative. And although the media tried to play down the importance of this message by calling it "taken out of context", the internet is a memory that doesn't erase so easily.
Pandemic as a reset trigger
Critics from around the world pointed out that the pandemic was the moment when ideas that Schwab had championed for decades suddenly began to be implemented.
Mass vaccination, digital covid passes, movement restrictions, border closures, app tracking - all fit within the framework of the model promoted by the WEF: centralized, techno-bureaucratic control, with reliance on artificial intelligence and surveillance. 👇
Schwab never directly participated in the creation of health policy, but his speeches and texts clearly indicate the ideological matrix that supports similar mechanisms. His position that the "global crisis" could serve as an occasion for the restructuring of the entire world has been known for a long time. And the pandemic was just that.
It is precisely for this reason that the WEF has become the subject of many theories, but also of concrete criticism. His personal ownership of the Forum was mentioned more and more often, as well as the fact that the organization, although officially non-profit, manages a capital of around 400 million Swiss francs and employs around a thousand people.
To make matters more interesting, even though Schwab is formally retiring, the organization remains in the hands of his family - which in practice means that nothing fundamentally changes the ownership structure. 👇
Resignation in the shadow of past accusations
It was not the first time Schwab tried to withdraw. Back in 2003, he appointed former Costa Rican President José Manuel Figueres as chairman, but he quickly stepped down after allegations of corruption. Last year, the Forum came under fire again – this time due to accusations by former associates of alleged sexism and racism within the organization. Everything was denied, but the damage to the image remained.
Davos used to be a place where businessmen and politicians gathered to "exchange ideas". Today, it is increasingly seen as a closed club where a few decide the future of the world, often without the insight of the general public. And that is precisely why Klaus Schwab's departure, although symbolic, will not erase the shadow he left behind. 👇
What comes after Schwab?
The lingering question is - is this the end of an era or just a change of scenery? Peter Brebek-Letmat comes from the world of large corporations, and there is little to suggest that the ideological direction of the Forum will go in the opposite direction. The increasing focus on digitization, centralization and "sustainable development" remains the foundation of the WEF agenda. There's not too much mystery here - just continuity.
And the world? He is increasingly skeptical. Especially when global power centers seem to speak for everyone while simultaneously losing touch with ordinary people. Klaus Schwab is leaving, but the ideas he pushed for decades - from the "Great Reset" to a world without personal property - remain in circulation.
Perhaps it is time to look no longer at individuals, but at the systems that create and maintain them. Because when ideas become bigger than their creators - then we know the stage is set for the next chapter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇷🇺💥☢️‼️The Most Dangerous Decision in History Is Now in Moscow‼️
October 3, 2025
While there is noise in London about the decision from Washington, words are being spoken in Moscow that feel like a cold shower. 👇
The British Mirror writes that the Kremlin reacted extremely harshly to U.S. plans to hand over Tomahawk and Barracuda missiles to Ukraine.
U.S. President Donald Trump’s idea that such systems could be used to attack Russian targets was immediately interpreted in Moscow as a scenario with unforeseeable consequences.
Russian officials stressed that they would have neither the time nor the means to verify whether the missiles carried conventional or nuclear warheads. “If a Tomahawk is launched from Ukrainian territory, no one will be able to distinguish whether it is a conventional or a nuclear weapon,” reported British journalists, quoting Russian representatives. 👇
This is precisely where the crux of the problem lies—any such missile could be perceived as a direct threat to Moscow.
In the background of the whole story is the legal framework. Experts remind us that these are systems with a range exceeding 1,500 kilometers, and that their launch requires the direct involvement of the American or British military. According to the norms of international law, it would be a clear casus belli—a justification for opening a direct conflict.
Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for the Russian president, openly said that the issue of the Tomahawks would mark a new and serious wave of tension. British commentators admit that the message from Moscow sounded frightening and that the reactions in their media were full of indignation. 👇
🇫🇷🇺🇦💥🇷🇺‼️Unexpected twist: Macron changes tone after dramatic news from the front about foreign troops‼️
September 27, 2025
While the dust has not yet settled, descriptions of a series of Russian missile attacks hitting targets in the Chernihiv and Dnipropetrovsk regions are coming in from multiple sources. 👇
What particularly agitated the public was the allegation that up to 300 French soldiers and instructors could be among the victims. According to military analysts, this is one of the most difficult moments for Paris in the entire conflict.
Among the objects that suffered was an underground command bunker, which is believed to have housed several officers from NATO structures. The rocket strike carried out by the "Iskander" system was powerful enough to penetrate the protection and cause the complete collapse of the facility.
Sources close to the situation stress that this type of weapon is not used lightly - a signal that the target was extremely important. 👇
The Ukrainian side officially confirmed that two "Iskander" hit one of the training grounds, noting that it was impossible to avoid losses.
However, they did not specify which attack it was. When the opposing side decides on even partial recognition, insiders say, it generally means that the scale of the event cannot be completely concealed.
The biggest surprise came from Paris. After reports of hundreds of deaths leaked, President Emmanuel Macron changed his rhetoric. Commenting on Donald Trump's statements that he should open fire on Russian planes, the French leader emphasized that NATO should not go in that direction. 👇
🇷🇺🔥🇬🇧‼️Answer will not be expected for long: Russia threatened Britain with a preventive strike‼️
September 17, 2025
At the political top in Moscow, a sensitive topic was opened again - the relationship with Great Britain and the limits of tolerance. 👇
A member of the State Duma's defense committee, Andrey Kolesnik, said that in case of an aggressive move by London, Russia could also consider the option of a preventive response.
His words immediately attracted attention because they come at a time when the tone in international relations is already tightening.
Kolesnik reminded that history shows one thing: every attempt to test Moscow's endurance ended with firm and determined resistance. "If Britain uses force against Russia, we will respond according to the laws of wartime. 👇
The answer will not wait, maybe even preemptively - our missiles are faster," said the deputy, leaving an unequivocal impression that Russia will not allow its authority to be threatened.
At the same time, he added that Russia's military potential provides the possibility for an immediate response to any threat.
"There has not been a single case of weakness in the history of Moscow, and they know that well in London," Kolesnik stressed, alluding to the concerns of the British side. His words point to the attitude that the Kremlin will not tolerate humiliation under any circumstances. 👇
🇷🇺‼️The West tried to show Russia its strength, and then Putin demonstrated his own power…‼️
September 17, 2025
At the Mulino training ground on September 16, Vladimir Putin appeared in military uniform for the second time since the start of the special operation. 👇
The symbolism did not go unnoticed – while NATO was conducting the “Quadriga-2025” maneuvers in the West, Russia and Belarus raised the bar on their own territory to an entirely different level.
The numbers speak for themselves: 100,000 troops, about 10,000 units of weaponry and equipment, 41 training ranges. For comparison, NATO exercises involve about 8,000 troops and 1,000 pieces of equipment. This disproportion tells a story of its own.
Putin made it clear what the essence is – the defense of the Union State of Russia and Belarus against any external threat. “The exercise plans are based on the experience of the special operation,” the president emphasized, pointing out that the army is now rehearsing real-life scenarios rather than theories on paper. This is a signal to both allies and opponents: battlefield experience has been translated into strategy. 👇
The “West-2025” maneuvers did not remain limited to ground forces. They involved 333 aircraft, nearly 250 ships and auxiliary vessels. Six foreign armies also sent representatives, giving the drills an international dimension.
The weapons and military equipment exhibition alone showcased more than 400 pieces – 125 already in use, 194 undergoing testing, and 86 classified as experimental models. All this serves as a reminder that this is not a parade, but a practical workshop in combat readiness.
Military correspondent Aleksandr Kots added another dimension. He reminded that European states are already planning scenarios for the coming decade and are strengthening their defensive lines to the east. 👇
🇨🇳 🇷🇺 ...‼️Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a platform against imperialism‼️
September 3, 2025.
Summing up the results of the two-day summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization that ended yesterday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that the SCO could take a leading role in forming a more just and equitable global governance system. 👇
The Russian President explains:
"The SCO revives genuine multilateralism and lays the political and socio-economic foundation for the formation of a new system of stability and security in Eurasia."
Chinese leader Xi Jinping shares a similar view, saying:
"The world order is at a crossroads. We must take a clear stand against hegemonism and power politics, we must implement true multilateralism." 👇
Implications
In this way, the Russian president speaks of the SCO as a platform that will implement a project that Moscow has repeatedly discussed in the past two decades — a system of a unified security architecture based on the principle "from Lisbon to Vladivostok", that is, across the Eurasian space.
The emergence of such a structure would practically push the United States across both the Atlantic and the Pacific, finally ending the era of American interventionism.
In parallel with solving this ambitious task, the SCO must become, according to Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, a platform for promoting the ideal of multipolarity, but also a mechanism for practical opposition to American hegemony in a similar way to the BRICS, which is currently trying to build a system of joint responses to the American sanctions policy. 👇
🇷🇺🇨🇳‼️It has been decided: Russia stops supplying gas to Europe - All capacities go to China‼️
September 2, 2025
While Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping exchanged documents in front of the cameras in Beijing, a topic that had been hanging in the air for years began to turn into a concrete agreement. 👇
In the presence of the two presidents, a legally binding memorandum was signed on the construction of the "Power of Siberia 2" gas pipeline, along with the "Soyuz Vostok" transit leg through Mongolia.
It is a project that is worth more politically and economically than the numbers show - 50 billion cubic meters of gas per year should flow through a new route from Western Siberia straight to the Chinese market.
Alexey Miller, the general director of Gazprom, did not hesitate to emphasize that the Chinese are now receiving gas that previously went to European customers. 👇
"Based on the public statement of the leaders of the three countries, a memorandum on the construction of 'Force of Siberia 2' and 'Soyuz Vostok' was signed," he said, TASS reported. At the same time, he did not fail to mention that the capacity of the Far Eastern route, which is still being developed, is increasing from the originally planned 10 to 12 billion cubic meters per year.
It is interesting that this package is not just about one document. A total of four documents were signed in Beijing between Gazprom and the Chinese CNPC, including an agreement on strategic cooperation. This practically means that space is opened for a wider connection between the two energy companies, not only on the issue of gas pipelines.
And this is happening while the European Union already has a roadmap for the complete suspension of Russian gas imports from 2028. Crossing the European direction, it seems, simultaneously becomes the basis for stronger Chinese deliveries. 👇