🇩🇪‼️Klaus Schwab leaves suddenly: An unexpected turn at the Davos summit‼️
Without fanfare, quietly and almost under the radar, Klaus Schwab retired. The man who has been the face and brains behind the World Economic Forum (WEF) for years has decided to step down – immediately.
Although he previously said that everything will go gradually, in his style decisions are not made without a message. And the message is clear: something is changing at the top of the global order, or at least it is trying to create such an impression. 👇
In a statement released Monday, Schwab, who will soon turn 88, said he is stepping down as chairman and board member of the WEF effective immediately.
The decision was made at an extraordinary meeting of the Forum on Sunday. His deputy, Peter Brebek-Letmath, the former head of the Nestle Corporation, was appointed acting – and unanimously. The official version sounds smooth. But beneath the surface, it has been brewing for some time.
Back in early April, Schwab talked about retiring. Not because of pressure, he claimed, but because of age. However, those who follow the currents of global power know that for such figures retirement does not come without pressure - either internal or external. 👇
The WEF has come under the spotlight in recent years, but not for climate panels or discussions about digital currencies. At the center of the criticism were ideas that Schwab advocated for decades, which in 2020 crystallized into something he called - "The Great Reset".
An ideology that shook the world
What put Schwab at the center of much controversy was his clear view that the world must be transformed. In the book "COVID-19: The Great Reset", which he wrote with Thierry Malreau, he presented a plan that sounded to many like a dystopian agenda: a world in which individuals will not have personal property, but everything will be rented, where human activities will be digitally monitored, and decisions about health, finances and movement will be made centrally - supposedly in the interest of sustainability. 👇
The phrase that has been bandied around Davos for years - "You will have nothing, and you will be happy" - has become a symbol of that narrative. And although the media tried to play down the importance of this message by calling it "taken out of context", the internet is a memory that doesn't erase so easily.
Pandemic as a reset trigger
Critics from around the world pointed out that the pandemic was the moment when ideas that Schwab had championed for decades suddenly began to be implemented.
Mass vaccination, digital covid passes, movement restrictions, border closures, app tracking - all fit within the framework of the model promoted by the WEF: centralized, techno-bureaucratic control, with reliance on artificial intelligence and surveillance. 👇
Schwab never directly participated in the creation of health policy, but his speeches and texts clearly indicate the ideological matrix that supports similar mechanisms. His position that the "global crisis" could serve as an occasion for the restructuring of the entire world has been known for a long time. And the pandemic was just that.
It is precisely for this reason that the WEF has become the subject of many theories, but also of concrete criticism. His personal ownership of the Forum was mentioned more and more often, as well as the fact that the organization, although officially non-profit, manages a capital of around 400 million Swiss francs and employs around a thousand people.
To make matters more interesting, even though Schwab is formally retiring, the organization remains in the hands of his family - which in practice means that nothing fundamentally changes the ownership structure. 👇
Resignation in the shadow of past accusations
It was not the first time Schwab tried to withdraw. Back in 2003, he appointed former Costa Rican President José Manuel Figueres as chairman, but he quickly stepped down after allegations of corruption. Last year, the Forum came under fire again – this time due to accusations by former associates of alleged sexism and racism within the organization. Everything was denied, but the damage to the image remained.
Davos used to be a place where businessmen and politicians gathered to "exchange ideas". Today, it is increasingly seen as a closed club where a few decide the future of the world, often without the insight of the general public. And that is precisely why Klaus Schwab's departure, although symbolic, will not erase the shadow he left behind. 👇
What comes after Schwab?
The lingering question is - is this the end of an era or just a change of scenery? Peter Brebek-Letmat comes from the world of large corporations, and there is little to suggest that the ideological direction of the Forum will go in the opposite direction. The increasing focus on digitization, centralization and "sustainable development" remains the foundation of the WEF agenda. There's not too much mystery here - just continuity.
And the world? He is increasingly skeptical. Especially when global power centers seem to speak for everyone while simultaneously losing touch with ordinary people. Klaus Schwab is leaving, but the ideas he pushed for decades - from the "Great Reset" to a world without personal property - remain in circulation.
Perhaps it is time to look no longer at individuals, but at the systems that create and maintain them. Because when ideas become bigger than their creators - then we know the stage is set for the next chapter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇧🇷🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇿🇦➕‼️BRICS prepares a big turn - the Quiet Revolution begins‼️
April 21, 2025
As the world moves further away from a single center of power, the BRICS alliance is preparing a quiet tectonic strike that could reshape the way money moves between countries. 👇
The next decade could mark the end of an era in which the US dollar played an almost exclusive role in international payments. Instead, it opens up the possibility for countries to trade with each other without the mediation of large financial centers. And it's not just a plan - it's already underway.
Lavrov reveals the details: BRICS is working on an alternative that bypasses the dollar
The head of Russian diplomacy, Sergei Lavrov, confirmed that a new international payment mechanism is rapidly developing within BRICS. It is not a cosmetic change to the existing system - but a fundamentally different model that ignores the dollar as an intermediary. 👇
As Lavrov explains, this system has the potential to seriously shake up financial markets and offer a new way of exchanging value between countries.
No more waiting for SWIFT. There is no longer a need to conduct transactions through dollar accounts. More and more countries are looking for an alternative, and BRICS is now offering them that alternative. 👇
🇷🇴‼️Political earthquake in Romania: Simion breaks the polls, the West is worried‼️
Simion on the rise: Romania's presidential favorite announces return of Georgescu, accuses foreign embassies of interference
In Romania, the political atmosphere before the elections in May is increasingly tense. According to the latest survey by the renowned "Sociopol" agency, the right-wing candidate George Simion is currently leading with a convincing 35% of citizens' support. 👇
In second place is former Prime Minister Victor Ponta with 22%, which indicates that these two are the most likely to enter the second round of decision-making.
Simion, the leader of the conservative wing of the Romanian opposition, does not hide his ambition to change the political balance in the country, and in the campaign he is increasingly openly presenting his plans for the future distribution of power. 👇
In an interview with Steve Bannon, a former adviser to Donald Trump, he said that in the event of victory, he plans to return Câlin Georgescu, a politician who previously had broad public support, to a high position.
"When I become president, I will bring Georgescu back, because he is the Romanian with the most votes," said Simion, reminding that in Italy the prime minister's office, like that of Giorgia Meloni, plays a key role in the governance of the country. 👇
🇷🇺‼️Putin made a move that no one expected: the West was caught off guard‼️
While the relations between Moscow and the collective West are still at low temperatures, nuances are being observed in Russian politics that seemed unimaginable before.
In recent weeks, quietly conducted diplomatic talks have been launched between Russia and the US, and so far several meetings have been held behind closed doors. 👇
And while those meetings do not yet mean any sudden change of course, one specific move by Russian President Vladimir Putin managed to surprise even the most experienced observers of international relations.
Vietnam's Soha portal, which often relies on its own political analysis and diplomatic sources, published news that attracted attention in business and political circles: Russia unexpectedly returned seized property to a European company.
We are talking about the Italian white goods manufacturer Ariston, whose assets in Russia were nationalized a little more than a year ago as part of Moscow's broader response to the then intensified restrictive measures from the West. 👇
Back in 2023, Putin signed a decree by which numerous companies from EU member states, including Ariston, were placed under temporary state administration.
Such practice included more than a dozen companies from the USA and Europe, all within the broader concept of "symmetrical measures" presented by Moscow in response to pressure from abroad.
But now, a complete reversal. According to the Soha portal, Putin signed a new, sudden decree – this time announcing that the Ariston property is being returned to its original owner. 👇
🇪🇺🇷🇺‼️Shock in the EU: Brussels aimed at Moscow but hit the wrong target‼️
Instead of weakening Moscow, the new wave of sanctions, which European leaders envisioned as a "decisive blow" to the Russian economy, threatens to shake Europe itself to its foundations. 👇
This is exactly what the Austrian journalist Stefan Beig is saying, whose words are now echoing more and more loudly throughout industry circles. His analysis, published in the "eXXpress" newspaper, is getting more and more confirmations — Europe tripped over its own sanctions.
A few weeks ago, the countries of the European Union agreed on the 16th package of restrictions against Russia. At the center of that package: a ban on Russian aluminum imports. 👇
First with quotas, and then, from 2026 - a complete ban. In theory, it seemed like a plan to deal a blow to Russian metal exports, one of Moscow's most important sources of income. But practice, as often until now, has shown that papers do not drink water when they encounter market reality.
And Baig explains it without gloves: "The EU wanted to send a political signal against Putin. But what was intended as a message turns into an own goal." 👇
🇺🇸‼️The NATO general reveals when the conflict in Ukraine will end‼️
At a time when the war is exhausting in the trenches, and the maps on the ground are slowly changing colors, the former commander of NATO's allied forces, General Wesley Clark, comes out with an assessment that raises dust - and in the middle of Kiev. 👇
In a conversation with the Ukrainian media, Clark does not environment. He says that the eventual takeover of Odessa by Russia would mark the end of the current conflict and a de facto victory for Moscow. No twisting, no diplomatic gloves.
"If Russia gets to Odessa, that's the end. The end of the military phase, the end of the resistance, the end of the game," Clark says. In his view, Odessa is not just a port - it is a symbol. And the point after which, as he claims, there are no more maneuvers. 👇
Russian forces would thereby, according to him, complete a strategic arc along the Black Sea coast, and Kiev would lose its last significant outlet to the West.
But his message does not stop there. Clark believes that the Ukrainian forces cannot currently conduct a classic defense - not because they do not want to, but because, simply, they have nothing to do. 👇
🇷🇺🇺🇦🇺🇸‼️The Quiet Upheaval: How Putin Uses Trump's Trap to Take Control of the Game‼️
April 20, 2025
The prospects for ending the conflict in Ukraine seem more uncertain by the day. There is no respite on the ground - military operations continue on both sides, while internally, political pressures are eating away at leaders, especially US President Donald Trump. 👇
Although he repeated during the campaign that he would bring the crisis to an end in 24 hours, now, paradoxically, he found himself in a situation from which he cannot get out without consequences. Some analysts compare this stalemate to what his predecessor experienced when withdrawing troops from Afghanistan.
An analysis published by the Hudson Institute - tries to untangle the knot in which Trump, Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky found themselves. The bottom line? Trump is caught in the trap of his own promises. 👇
From the moment he stepped into the White House, Trump made peace in Ukraine one of his foreign policy priorities. During the campaign, he claimed that the war would have been prevented if the election had not been "stolen".
Now, faced with reality, there is no room for error. Attempts to establish a dialogue through his envoy Keith Kellogg did not bring concrete results. That's why Trump's man for the Middle East, who recently traveled to Russia and met with Putin, entered the scene. 👇