🚨BREAKING: To add to Harvard’s ongoing woes, we have uncovered a shocking new detail.
Harvard University may have violated US sanctions by hosting and providing training sessions for a Chinese paramilitary organization (XPCC)
Here's what we found 🧵
Harvard, along with other top US universities, is already facing intense scrutiny over foreign gifts and contracts that raise concerns about undue foreign influence.
Secretary @LindaMcMahonEd has said that Harvard has not been “fully transparent or complete in its disclosures." The Dept. of Education is currently investigating Harvard’s foreign donations.
Since 2012, Harvard has received over $1.1 billion in foreign funding, with significant contributions from China.
These gifts often come with “strings attached” that potentially comprise academic freedom and lead to partnerships that present huge attack areas for espionage, intellectual property theft, and corruption.
In 2014, the Chan family -- well-connected Hong Kong real estate tycoons -- donated $350 million to the Harvard Public Health School, and Harvard renamed the school in their honor.
Gerald Chan called the donation a “gift unsolicited, unrestricted, and unexpected.” This particular gift introduced meaningful vectors of influence from the PRC into Harvard.
We go into great detail about these vectors in our report, here:
How did it lead to a possible sanctions violation?
In 2018, the Chan School of Public Health formalized partnerships with seven PRC institutions through the Harvard-China Health Partnership (HCHP).
The HCHP trained CCP officials -- including, in 2019 and 2023, officials from the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC).
What exactly is the XPCC?
The Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC 新疆生产建设兵团) is a state-run paramilitary corporate conglomerate that operates in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
As the regional government, paramilitary organization and state-run corporate enterprise, the XPCC runs prisons, a media empire, the educational system and agricultural projects.
In the last five years in particular, the XPCC has played a critical role in suppressing Uyghur life, culture, and identity through the following means:
- extrajudicial internment and imprisonment
- land expropriation
- forcible migration of people
- repressive, pre-emptive policing
- social engineering
- religious persecution
- forced labor
The U.S. State Department has accused China of “genocide” against Uyghurs, and imposed sanctions on the XPCC in 2020.
In 2022, the U.S. also passed the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA), which bans the import of goods linked to forced labor in Xinjiang.
Perhaps Harvard inviting the XPCC in 2019 is excusable.
But Harvard University’s undisclosed ties to XPCC officials as late as October 2023 raises questions about Harvard’s compliance to these US sanctions and complicity with an entity responsible for egregious rights violations in the Uyghur Region.
In a statement to @IsaacStoneFish, Harvard admitted to training the XPCC.
The “goal with these trainings is straightforward,” the spokesperson wrote. “To build capacity for public officials across China to create effective insurance programs with sustainable financial models so that all people across China can get access to high-quality health care.”
If one were to type “decolonize” into the Harvard online course catalog’s search box, one would find that it appears in the titles of 7 courses and the descriptions of 18 more.
“Oppression” and “liberation” are in the descriptions of more than 80 courses. “Social justice” is in >100.
Given its land seizures and function as a military force that suppresses the Uyghurs, the XPCC is by all accounts a repressive, colonial institution.
The irony of course is that this is an elite institution that has spent decades posturing itself as a paragon of progressive values and a stalwart of social justice refusing to reckon with the moral implications of willingly training members of the XPCC, an organization that is antithetical to everything that social justice purportedly stands for.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another instance of journos tainting @elonmusk with the worst possible associations - this time Stalin - based on unnamed sources and baseless claims about filling top positions at OPM (Office of Personnel Management) with his “lackeys”
Let me show you what a pathetic excuse for an article this is 🧵
It opens with a source listing some names of incoming appointees and how they are linked to Elon’s companies.
Then they quote a professor from Harvard Kennedy School of Government who says “in the past, there have been one or maybe two political appointees in ALL of OPM”
The idea is that THIS year is an exception.
But a cursory look into the plumbook shows that in 2024, there were at least 17 political appointees in Biden’s OPM, excluding the open director slot.
I wonder how different our world would be like if our leaders and intelligentsia weren't so completely divorced from violence - both simulated or real.
Ancient Greek thinkers such as Plato - meaning "broad shoulders," so named because of a physique honed by wrestling - were not
merely men who lived their lives in their heads, pontificating in abstraction away from any understanding of savagery and the zero sum nature of conflict. Both Hemingway and Orwell fought in the Spanish Civil War.
Today, the stereotype that characterizes our erudite class is the
bespectacled tweed-wearing waif who turns down his nose at the idea of physicality. UFC, wrestling, heay weight lifting - these are signifiers of low social status or of a lesser intellect.
We need an elite who is in constant contact with reality, who
Affirmative Action backfires in many ways, failing to help the minority students it purports to help. Blacks feel like they don’t belong; Asians feel resentful.
Singapore rejects AA but has a solution that has seen success
“Like many of the other ideas pushed during the racial reckoning (see: defund the police), affirmative action appears to be yet another manifestation of what @robkhenderson has so astutely called “luxury beliefs.” Does the actual fate of these students not matter as much as their… https://t.co/2UEJXrfuEgtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
“Asians have to score 450 points higher than black students & 150 points higher than whites to have the same chance of admission to Harvard.”
“Majority of Americans oppose affirmative action at public universities by a margin of 74% to 26%, including a solid majority of Dems”
In the early 2000s when I left Singapore for America, most Singaporeans admired the US.
My sense being back here these days is that not only is it no longer true, there's a considerable amount of contempt for America due to its cultural export of woke garbage.
Relatives and
high school friends who I never once ever talked politics with my whole life suddenly are eager to engage me on how American politics and how "crazy America has become."
Sometimes it's about crime, sometimes it's about lawlessness or the homeless/drug epidemic, but increasingly
it's about "the gender stuff."
They ask me why this is going on, and how it came to pass that reality is actively being denied en masse. They name-drop Professor @jordanbpeterson and @benshapiro, and tell me they've all seen my clips on Joe Rogan and other pods.