The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Apr 22, 2025 25 tweets 9 min read Read on X
The Sistine Chapel is one of the world's greatest buildings, and it has the most famous ceiling in history.

But what is it, who built it, and what does "Sistine" even mean?

Well, here's the surprisingly controversial history of the Sistine Chapel... Image
Where did the Sistine Chapel get its name?

It was commissioned in 1473 by Pope Sixtus IV and completed nine years later.

His name in Italian was Sisto and the chapel was named after him, hence "Sistine" Chapel. Image
Where is the Sistine Chapel?

It's within the Apostolic Palace — the Pope's official residence — in the Vatican City.

But, for such a famous and important building, it isn't very noteworthy or impressive from the outside. Image
After Sixtus' chapel was completed he had it decorated by the leading artists of the day, such as Botticelli, Ghirlandaio, and Perugino.

Everybody looks up — but along the walls of the Sistine Chapel are some of the other great works of the Italian Renaissance. Image
Well, their fame has been eclipsed by Michelangelo's ceiling.

By his early thirties Michelangelo had become the greatest sculptor in Italy, having already made the Pieta and David.

But he wasn't much of a painter — it was marble that Michelangelo loved most. Image
Enter Pope Julius II, nephew of Sixtus IV, known as the "warrior pope" — his papal name was inspired by Julius Caesar.

This portrait of him by Raphael seems to show a pious old man... but it actually depicts Julius in mourning over the loss of Bologna in war. Image
Julius may have been a warmonger, but he was also a patron of the arts — perhaps because he wanted his name to be remembered forever.

So in 1508 he commissioned Michelangelo, then 33, to paint the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel.

His fee was equivalent to about $500,000 dollars.
Michelangelo started work in 1508 — it would take him four years to finish.

The ceiling had originally been painted like the night sky, with stars over a blue background.

This was removed for Michelangelo, who painted on freshly laid plaster each day. Image
Popular myth says Michelangelo painted the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel laying on his back, but the truth is that he painted it standing, bent over backwards on a special raised scaffold.

He had back problems for the rest of his life — and even wrote a poem about it: Image
This is the overall plan of Michelangelo's ceiling.

A complex array of stories from the Old Testament, especially from Genesis, and of prophets and other biblical scenes, along with a motley crew of angels, cherubs, and more.

A totality of scripture made visible in art. Image
So there's a lot going on here — there are more than three hundred figures in all.

And it's a supreme example of illusionistic art: the surface of the ceiling is smooth, but Michelangelo organised his figures among painted architectural details to create depth and order. Image
The most famous parts are those he painted last.

He started with the minor scenes because he wanted to perfect his technique before attempting to paint God — it's easy to forget that Michelangelo was literally learning on the job.

Here God divides the light from the darkness: Image
The ceiling of the Sistine Chapel is also, curiously, filled with acorns.

Why? Julius II was born Giuliano della Rovere, and Rovere means oak in Italian.

Hence his personal symbol was the acorn, and Michelangelo's inclusion of them was a symbol of his patronage. Image
Four years passed, Michelangelo completed his project, and the ceiling was unveiled in November 1512.

It was immediately hailed as a masterpiece and Michelangelo as the greatest artist of all time.

As the biographer Giorgio Vasari said only a few years later: Image
But Michelangelo was a controversial artist whose works inevitably divided people.

Most startling of all was his decision to include five "sibyls" — oracles from the ancient world of Greece, Rome, and Persia.

Mixing pagan and Christian figures was, at the time, shocking. Image
Others were appalled by the amount of nudity.

But Michelangelo, true to the Renaissance and its revival of ancient art, was inspired by the heroic nude statues of Ancient Greece and Rome.

Hence the muscular torsos and twisting bodies which defined his painting and sculpture. Image
Twenty year later, in 1535, Michelangelo was invited back to the Sistine Chapel by Pope Paul III.

This time he was asked to paint the last judgment on its altar wall.

Michelangelo had the wall adjusted — so that its top sticks out further than the bottom — and got to work. Image
Over the next six years he broke radically from traditional depictions of the last judgment.

His version was far more complex, he didn't paint Jesus on a throne, he didn't arrange the angels or resurrected as described in the Bible, and he included figures from Greek mythology. Image
Jesus hadn't been portrayed beardless for centuries (which was controversial in itself), not to mention that his muscular body makes him look more like a Greek god.

This was highly unorthodox and widely criticised, but Michelangelo the aging master was a law unto himself. Image
And so, even before it was finished, The Last Judgment became controversial.

Its departure from scripture, its complex composition, its profusion of violently contorted bodies... as Vasari writes, this was too much for some, especially in a place like the Sistine Chapel: Image
Michelangelo's portrayal of Biagio da Cesena remains: as Minos, judge of the underworld, enwrapped by a serpent.

Here we see Michelangelo's ruthless and uncompromising personality in full — he used the Sistine Chapel, ostensibly a holy place, to get revenge on his critics. Image
In the end Michelangelo's non-scriptural Last Judgement, a wall of three hundred confusingly arranged naked bodies, was just too much.

So after his death, in 1564, Michelangelo's former pupil Daniele da Volterra was hired to paint loincloths over the nude figures. Image
The Sistine Chapel was used continuously for five centuries, whether for religious services or for the conclave that gathers to elect the new pope.

And so by the 20th century its ceiling had deteriorated, with the paintings covered in soot and grime. Image
In the 1980s there was a major restoration.

All filth and the remains of previous restorations were removed in an attempt to restore Michelangelo's original work.

From beneath the soot emerged a far brighter ceiling, but some argued that Michelangelo's subtleties had been lost. Image
And that's a brief history of the Sistine Chapel, filled with some of the most influential and controversial art ever made.

Perhaps it should even be called Michelangelo's Chapel — after all, it his radical art and his unusual personality that have come to define the place.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Aug 31, 2025
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets
Aug 21, 2025
The world's most famous neoclassical buildings are kind of boring and generic when you actually look at them.

It's even hard to tell them apart: which one below is Versailles, or Buckingham Palace?

So here's why neoclassical architecture (although it's nice) is overrated: Image
Buckingham Palace, despite being one of the world's most famous and visited buildings, is essentially quite boring and uninspiring from the outside.

There's a certain stateliness to it, but (like most big neoclassical buildings) it's really just a box wrapped in pilasters. Image
The same is true of Versailles.

Again, it's evidently pretty (largely thanks to the colour of its stone) but there's something weirdly plain about it, almost standardised.

Plus the emphasis on its horizontal lines makes it feel very low-lying, undramatic, and flat. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 17, 2025
These aren't castles, palaces, or cathedrals.

They're all water towers, literally just bits of infrastructure relating to water management.

Is it worth the additional cost and resources to make things look like this... or is it a waste? Image
These old water towers are an architectural subgenre of their own.

There are hundreds, mostly Neo-Gothic, and all add something wonderful to the skylines of their cities.

Like the one below in Bydgoszcz, Poland, from 1900.

But, most importantly, they're just infrastructure. Image
We don't think of infrastructure as something that can improve how a town looks and feels.

Infrastructure is necessary to make life convenient; but also, we believe, definitionally boring.

These water towers prove that doesn't have to, and shouldn't be, the case. Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 8, 2025
If one thing sums up the 21st century it's got to be all these default profile pictures.

You've seen them literally thousands of times, but they're completely generic and interchangeable.

Future historians will use them to symbolise our current era, and here's why... Image
To understand what any society truly believed, and how they felt about humankind, you need to look at what they created rather than what they said.

Just as actions instead of words reveal who a person really is, art always tells you what a society was actually like.
And this is particularly true of how they depicted human beings — how we portray ourselves.

That the Pharaohs were of supreme power, and were worshipped as gods far above ordinary people, is made obvious by the sheer size and abundance of the statues made in their name: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 6, 2025
This is St. Anne's Church in Vilnius, Lithuania.

It's over 500 years old and the perfect example of a strange architectural style known as "Brick Gothic".

But, more importantly, it's a lesson in how imagination can transform the way our world looks... Image
Vilnius has one of the world's best-preserved Medieval old towns.

It's a UNESCO World Heritage Site, filled with winding streets and architectural gems from across the ages.

A testament to the wealth, grandeur, and sophistication of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Image
Among its many treasures is the Church of St Anne, built from 1495 to 1500 under the Duke of Lithuania and (later) King of Poland, Alexander I Jagiellon.

It's not particularly big — a single nave without aisles — but St Anne's makes up for size with its fantastical brickwork. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 31, 2025
Tell your friends! Your enemies! Your lovers!

The Spanish edition of my new book, El Tutor Cultural, is now available for pre-order.

It'll be released on 22 October — and you can get it at the link in my bio.

To celebrate, here are the 10 best things I've written about Spain: from why Barcelona looks the way it does to one of the world's most underrated modern architects, from the truth about Pablo Picasso to the origins of the Spanish football badge...Image
What makes Barcelona such a beautiful city? It wasn't an accident — this is the story of how the modern, beloved Barcelona was consciously created:

Image
And, speaking of Barcelona, here's why the renovation of the Camp Nou is — although necessary — a shame:

Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(