Michael Pettis Profile picture
Apr 23 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
1/8
This Caixin article summarizes various proposals by Chinese academics on how to respond to Trump's tariffs. Most of these proposals focus on boosting domestic demand, but some involve expanding "free-trade" relationships with other countries, which...
caixinglobal.com/2025-04-18/in-…
2/8
basically means that if the US stops absorbing China's growing trade surplus, China should ensure that other countries (mainly Europe) do so instead.

But this misses the point. Dozens of countries have already raised tariffs on Chinese goods, and this is likely to worsen.
3/8
Of course if other countries refuse to replace the US as the consumer of last resort of China's manufacturing expansion, the resulting contraction in China's trade surplus requires either that domestic production decline or that domestic demand rise.
4/8
Because the former means a contraction in GDP and a rise in unemployment, the latter is obviously the preferred and only sustainable solution, and nearly every Chinese economist recognizes this. China simply cannot continue running such a low consumption share of GDP.
5/8
How to raise domestic demand? There is one proposal to expand investment in infrastructure, but most Chinese economists recognize that infrastructure investment has already passed reasonable limits, and so other proposals are aimed mainly at consumption.
6/8
Most of these proposals correctly focus on current transfers, and these are really the only kind of proposals that are likely to boost consumption in the near term, although they do so at the cost of rising government debt. One economist argues, for example, that...
7/8
"the government should consider issuing another 1 trillion yuan in ultra-long special treasury bonds to pay for unemployment benefits, food vouchers for low-income individuals, and providing living allowances to college and university graduates."
8/8
Is 1 trillion enough? The hope is that a big enough spending boost becomes self-reinforcing if it encourages local manufacturers to expand production, hire workers and raise wages. But for that to happen, consumption must rise by more than the decline in foreign demand.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Apr 25
1/14
This article by Tim Harford is useful because it shows some of the partial thinking that often distorts discussions about trade. One area of confusion is when he discusses how comparative advantage works.

via @ftft.com/content/21a78e…
2/14
As he discusses the arithmetic of comparative advantage, he fails to emphasize that it is able to maximize total production only because each side exports the goods and services in which it has a comparative production advantage in order to import those in which it doesn't.
3/14
Comparative advantage, in other words, can only be expressed in the exchange of goods and services, which means that for the world to benefit from comparative advantage, countries should maximize exports in order to pay for imports, not to externalize weak domestic demand.
Read 14 tweets
Apr 24
1/8
Good Keith Bradsher article on the extent of automation in the car industry: "China’s secret weapon in the trade war is an army of factory robots, powered by artificial intelligence, that have revolutionized manufacturing."

nytimes.com/2025/04/23/bus…
2/8
"As a result," he continues, "China’s factories will be able to keep the price of many of its exports lower, giving it an advantage in fighting the trade war."

But it is more complicated than that. Automation increases the productivity of workers.
3/8
That's a good thing if wages keep pace with rising productivity. If not, it must result in an even greater imbalance between what Chinese workers can produce in the aggregate and what they can consume, which in turn will require a greater trade surplus to resolve.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 23
1/4
Caixin: "China reported better-than-expected year-on-year GDP growth of 5.4% in the first quarter, in stark contrast to the country’s fiscal performance — tax revenue fell 3.5% in the period, continuing a downward trend that began at the end of 2023."

caixinglobal.com/2025-04-22/ana…
2/4
According to the MoF, the main reason for the decline in tax revenues was tax rebates for businesses that spent on equipment, logistics and R&D expenses.

This helps show why it is so hard to boost the domestic role of consumption.
3/4
On the one hand, the sustainable way to boost consumption and rebalance the economy requires higher direct or indirect wages for Chinese households, but businesses cannot tolerate this because they are already losing money.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 20
1/5
Reuters: "Policymakers have to walk a tight rope as the yuan has come under pressure after U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught, while shrinking interest margins at lenders has continued to limit the scope for monetary easing."
reuters.com/markets/rates-…
2/5
Reuters adds that "A reduction to the banks' deposit rates could alleviate net interest margin pressure at lenders and allow them to lower lending rates," but this also shows why rebalancing is so difficult.
3/5
While lowering the deposit rate would indeed allow banks to lower lending rates without squeezing their margins further, it represents a further transfer of income from net lenders in the system (households) to net borrowers (businesses and governments).
Read 5 tweets
Apr 18
1/5
WSJ: "In the two weeks since President Trump’s “Liberation Day,” many U.S. trade partners have a clear plan to convince Washington against reimposing stiff tariffs on their exports to the U.S.: buy more American stuff."

via @WSJwsj.com/economy/trade/…
2/5
Getting foreigners to "buy more American stuff" may seem like an obvious way to resolve US trade imbalances, but it isn't. Trade clears systemically, and without changing the domestic policies that drive savings imbalances, trade imbalances won't change.
3/5
If foreigners agree to buy more specific goods from the US, this simply shifts US imbalances between countries and sectors, without changing them in the aggregate. That's because as long as they produce more than they can invest or consume domestically, they must...
Read 5 tweets
Apr 16
1/4
Because the only sustainable way to rebalance the Chinese economy towards a greater role for consumption in driving demand requires that household income, including transfers, rise faster than GDP, it is good news that...
english.news.cn/20250416/47426…
2/4
China's per capita disposable income increased by 5.6% (5.5% nominal) year on year in the first quarter of 2025, versus GDP growth of 5.4%.

The problem is that the gap between GDP growth and household income growth must be much larger.
3/4
For China to balance meaningfully over the next ten years, for example, consumption must grow by roughly 3 percentage points more than GDP every year, which suggests that household income must also grow that much faster.
carnegieendowment.org/posts/2024/09/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(