Bo Winegard Profile picture
Apr 23 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
A major problem with the "It's unseemly to focus on the causes of racial disparities" argument is that the media WILL focus on racial disparities. Endlessly. And we know they have an answer. Racism. Image
You can't have it both ways. If focusing on racial disparities is unseemly, then the proposed cause should be irrelevant.

And if it's reasonable to point to racism, then it's also reasonable to point to groups differences in relevant traits.
Ultimately people like Yglesias who want to preserve the taboo about race differences end up promoting a double standard. If the cause is racism, we can discuss it. If not, we should be quiet.
I have no idea if Hollywood is racist, though I doubt it. But if somebody proposes that Hollywood is racist, then we should be allowed to explore the topic while considering all potential hypotheses, including differences in IQ and self-control et cetera.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bo Winegard

Bo Winegard Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EPoe187

Apr 21
1. Matt Yglesias recently argued that we should preserve a taboo on investigating group differences in the United States. He's wrong.

aporiamagazine.com/p/a-troublesom…
2. He notes that blacks are massively disproportionately represented in the NBA, but so are men from the former Yugoslavia. However, he also notes he has not looked into the causes because it would be "unseemly" to be preoccupied with such a question. Image
3. We take the taboo against pursuing questions about race differences for granted, but this assertion should astonish us. A smart, curious man (Matt) is embracing ignorance about a compelling question because it is "unseemly." This is illiberal and anti-intellectual. Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 20, 2024
1. Hughes should be praised for his consistency and thoughtfulness, but the color blindness that he advocates is impossible and should be rejected by any realist about human nature. It is no more plausible than communism. And perhaps more insidious.
2. I wrote a long review of it for @AporiaMagazine. Here I will only briefly summarize it.

The first issue is the nature of race. Is race a biological phenomenon or is it a social construction?

aporiamagazine.com/p/the-god-that…
3. The extreme social constructionist view is exceedingly unlikely to be true. Human populations differ from each other in patterned and predictable ways. Hughes recognizes this and argues that race is somewhere between a natural kind and a social construct. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jul 17, 2024
1:) I wrote about the Founders' view of human nature, a constrained and pessimistic view.

aporiamagazine.com/p/conceived-in…
2:) Obviously, Thomas Jefferson had different views from James Madison who had different views from Alexander Hamilton. My analysis is based on The Federalist, a collection of essays written to defend the Constitution of 1787. Image
3:) The vision of human nature presented in The Federalist is surprisingly pessimistic. For The Federalist, man is a passionate, capricious, rapacious, and often irrational animal. Human nature is unalterable. Transformation is impossible. Image
Read 20 tweets
Jul 15, 2024
Perhaps the simplest question in politics is should white people care about remaining majorities in countries which their ancestors created. The rest, as they say, is details. Demographics are destiny.
Of course, a kind of pluralism is perfectly consistent with this desire. It's not an easy or simplistic pluralism. And it's not something we've discussed candidly. But it's something which should merit more conversation moving forward. That's not easy or expedient. But necessary.
Race realism will eventually be discussed at a high level because it has crucial consequences. The time has not yet arrived for such candid conversations. But it will. And I hope that the uniquely American genius for debate will prevail over those who want to suppress dissent.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 25, 2024
1. In 2013, John Horgan contemplated banning research on race and IQ, even though he was otherwise a "hard-core defender of freedom of speech and science" because it had no "redeeming value." Image
2. This is a common position from otherwise steadfast "champions" of free speech and inquiry. Many advocates of "heterodoxy" either ignore the topic or actively call for self-censorship (or worse).
3. The claim that such research has no "redeeming value" is ludicrous. Understanding the causes of large gaps in IQ is obviously important and only those who have not considered the topic for more than a few minutes could seriously maintain that it's without value.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 28, 2024
In practice, colorblindness is used by progressives to belittle white identity while promoting black and Hispanic identity. Thus calling for colorblindness is like calling for cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma in which the opponent will definitely defect. It's a losing move.
Worse, those who promote colorblindness are rarely (never?) honest about the mammoth disparities that would result. How would we explain those? Progressives would feel vindicated: "See...society really is racist. We told you. This is exactly why we need DEI."
I have yet to see anybody seriously grapple with this challenge. Instead, they promote colorblindness and perfunctorily discuss closing "skills gaps" by spending more money on education--and by encouraging school choice. Tried and failed.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(