You can't serve in the military if you have asthma.
But because of two federal judges, we have to bend over backwards to accommodate a "condition" that requires lifelong hormones and multiple surgeries?
We need to fight this. 🧵
At the outset of his administration, President Trump signed a common-sense executive order barring transgender military service. In February, the Pentagon issued a memo affirming that people with a history of gender dysphoria are "incompatible" with U.S. military service.
Two federal judges didn't just block the policy—they ordered the Pentagon to immediately resume providing "gender-affirming medical care" to transgender military service members.
That includes hormone therapy and sex-change surgeries.
You can't serve in the military if you have asthma, braces, or a peanut allergy. You can't serve if you take certain kinds of acne medications, or if you've taken ADHD meds within the past year.
But if you're a man who is convinced he's a woman, the military has to indulge you.
This is an attempt to restore—by judicial fiat—one of the more patently insane efforts to transform our federal government into a vehicle for left-wing activism.
For the past four years, every government institution—including the military—has embraced pedal-to-the-metal leftism.
There's no rational argument for something like this. They barely even pretended it had anything to do with military readiness. It's pure ideology.
And they were doing it even as they were firing healthy young soldiers who didn't want to take the vaccine.
The United States military exists to be the most lethal and effective fighting force in the world. Its job is to be really good at killing people. That's what it's for.
Leftism is a civilizational poison in every place it touches. But in the military, it's downright suicidal.
President Trump was right to sign this executive order. Pete Hegseth was right to implement it. And the entire administration is right to fight this ridiculous effort to block them from prioritizing military readiness over left-wing social engineering.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Supreme Court just heard arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor—a case about whether public schools can force kids to learn radical transgender ideology, even over parents' religious objections.
The Justices are likely to deal a blow to this woke ideology.
Here's what happened. 🧵
In 2022, the Montgomery County public school system introduced a series of "LGBTQ-inclusive" storybooks to be taught in pre-K to 5th grade.
When hundreds of parents raised religious objections, school bureaucrats eliminated parental notice and the ability to opt-out.
These books taught kids to: (1) view pronouns and gender as arbitrary choices; (2) reject those who believe in traditional marriage; and (3) find terms like “drag queens,” “leather” in a sexual context, “non-binary,” and sex workers in image searches.
The Supreme Court bypassed normal appellate procedure to halt President Trump's deportation of more illegal aliens.
There a lot of misinformation floating around about judicial rulings, the Alien Enemies Act, and immigration law.
Let's clear a few things up.🧵
On Apr. 7, SCOTUS held: 1. Judge Boasberg had no jurisdiction over the Tren de Aragua deportations under the Alien Enemies Act; 2. Those TdA thugs must seek relief under "habeas" where they are confined (Texas).
Last Wednesday, the ACLU filed, in NDTX before Judge Wes Hendrix, a habeas petition and a motion for an ex parte TRO, asking the court to enjoin the Trump Admin's deportation of TdA members confined in NDTX without giving the Trump Admin notice or opportunity to respond.
This was written in the early months of the Biden presidency. But it lays out, in detail, exactly what they would go on to do—and how they justified it.
By adopting the framework of "domestic terrorism" (DT), they could effectively treat their critics as enemies of the state.
For years, the State Department ran a global censorship operation—not just in America, but across the West.
Now, it's pushing free speech instead.
Here's why this matters. 🧵
The "disinformation" and "hate speech" industry is one of the top threats to Western freedom today.
"From its very beginnings," @SecRubio writes, this industry "has existed to protect the American establishment from the voices of forgotten Americans."
As Attorney General of Missouri, I sued the Biden admin for working with Big Tech to censor conservatives. We took them all the way to the Supreme Court.
That case—Missouri v. Biden—led to the release of thousands of pages of documents detailing a vast censorship enterprise.
This is one I'm especially excited about. Sarah Rogers is a free speech champion—and we've worked together on some of the big anti-censorship fights of the past few years.
Another sign that this State Department is serious about dismantling the censorship-industrial complex.
Today, Sarah had her confirmation hearing for Undersecretary of Public Diplomacy at the State Department.
Under Biden, that position effectively served as a U.S. "censorship czar."
Sarah is going to help this administration transform it into a "free speech czar" role instead.
This is a big issue for me—going back to my days as Missouri AG. We filed the Missouri v. Biden lawsuit that exposed how the last administration was wielding agencies like the State Department to build a vast global censorship enterprise:
Klaus Schwab, kingpin of the World Economic Forum and face of the woke globalist movement is RESIGNING.
We didn't eat the bugs. We don't live in the pod. We won. He lost.
Here's the story of Schwab's reign of terror. 🧵
Founded in 1971, the WEF was originally a small club of faceless suits. By 2025, it had become an international powerhouse, representing the global special interests eroding American sovereignty and liberty.
How powerful? President Zelenskyy wore a suit.
Schwab’s big economic idea: "You’ll own nothing and be happy," sounds like a Bond villain's Marxist dystopian sales pitch...because it is.