Let's discuss the *actual* charges against Judge Hannah Dugan using the Complaint against her.
tl;dr - she sent the man in question into the public hallway where agents there to arrest him watched him walk by and did nothing. 1/ storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
¶12 - They had a 6-member task force including one ICE, one CBP, 2 FBI and 2 DEA agents. Whew!
¶10 - because of courthouse security, they knew he would be unarmed.
6 people for one unarmed guy. OK. 2/
Starting at around ¶20 there's a lengthy discussion about Judge Dugan's demeanor - "visibly angry" and "walking quickly." Have they never met a judge? Do you think they like having their calendar messed up? Would the same words have been applied to a male judge? 3/
¶32 a discussion about Judge Dugan "forcefully" and "stern[ly] instructing the man in question to go out the jury door. BUT! It is not only a door to the jury room. It is *also* an exit to the *public* hallway. You know, the hallway where law enforcement is waiting. 4/
Let's jump to the heart of the matter - the lede is buried at ¶33. Per the complaint, the judge apparently sent the man TO THE PUBLIC HALLWAY WHERE LAW ENFORCEMENT WAS WAITING. You'll note they sort of gloss over this part. It's as if he miraculously appeared there. 5/
Then what happens? The two DEA agents SEE him and do [checks notes] nothing. They don't arrest him, they don't do anything. They watch him? 6/
So 2 law enforcement officers, there to arrest an unarmed man, just watch him. Meanwhile, the man & his lawyer go to the elevators. Note this weird comment to try to make walking to the elevators sound nefarious: 7/
Here's why this is absurd - there are 2 banks of elevators in the courthouse: 1 goes to the ground floor, and 1 goes to the 9th street exit which is where the parking structure is. In fact, there are even SIGNS telling you which bank of elevator goes where. 8/
So - yes - you sometimes walk past one set of elevators so you can get where you want to go. If you are not going to the parking structure (which most people are), you take the other set of elevators because they are less crowded. 9/
Suspicious? No - literally something hundreds of people do daily in the courthouse. This attempt to make it into something is just dumb (especially since they claim to be familiar with the elevators - clearly not). 10/
Back to the complaint - instead of arresting the man (that's why they're there, right?) 1 of the DEA agents hops in the elevator with him, having alerted the other agents. Pity - he can't speak Spanish so he has no idea what the man & his lawyer are saying. 11/
They then have some sort of keystone cop moment where the man is at the ground level but the agents go to the lower level and have to race around to find him. They chase him and arrest him. Which they could have done in the public hallway but chose not to. 12/
All of which is to say - the attempt to make this into something criminal on the part of the judge who sent him to the public hall where law enforcement was waiting requires a lot of reaching and a lot of work and a lot of pejorative statements designed to taint the complaint.13/
Again - *Per the complaint* the judge sent him into the public hallway directly to the DEA agents waiting there for him. They just inexplicably chose not to act. This was their choice. 14/
The further attempt to sensationalize the matter by arresting Judge Dugan - instead of simply asking her to appear - was wholly unnecessary and certainly appears to be designed solely to intimidate. Very unfortunate. 15/
@threadreaderapp Please unroll.
Please like / follow / share!!!
Also - a reminder - I block people who call me names. Just FYI.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Why do so many people feel like late-night ballot totals are new (when they are not)? Answer: It has everything to do with the difference between “calling” an election, and having complete totals in. A thread: 1/10
When the margins in a race are very large (1 side is winning by a lot) the press calls the race even though all ballots aren’t accounted for. This frequently happens in states that are ‘red’ or ‘blue.’ For example CA gets called even though it takes them a long time to count.2/10
Sometimes a presidential race is called before WI tallies its votes. Why? Because our 10 electoral votes don’t affect the likely result. Again - this is a “call”, not the actual results. And that’s fine! If we can know who won, great! 3/10
A quick Wisconsin review of Trump’s new executive order:
tl;dr – This does *not* change anything for our upcoming election for Supreme Court on April 1. Here’s why: 1/7
1-State elections are governed by state law, not federal law. The WI Supreme CT race is a state race only (there are no federal elections at all on April 1), so any federal demands do not and cannot affect this race. 2/7
2-the EO focuses on the NVRA (National Voting Rights Act) and purports to require proof of citizenship for those persons using the NVRA form to register to vote. WI is *exempt* from the NVRA. 3/7
Wisconsin voting: A brief update on the 193 City of Madison absentee ballots that were not counted. The WI Elections Commission (WEC) did not learn about these ballots until 12/18/24, long after the election had been certified (on 11/29/24). 1/6
12/19/24, WEC staff asked for a call with the Madison Clerk and City Atty., which occurred on 12/20. WEC asked the clerk for details on how this happened, and a statement was provided by her on 12/23. That statement gave some information, but left many outstanding questions. 2/6
On 12/26, I directed our legal team to prepare a memo on what authority the WEC had to further investigate the matter. That memo indicated that the WEC did have the power to investigate, and I asked that a meeting be scheduled so that the WEC could vote to investigate. 3/6
Important update on Wisconsin: Milwaukee Central Count hit a snafu today. The tabulator machines have doors that are supposed to be locked and sealed before tabulation. Sadly, that did not occur this morning. Both political parties agree that nothing was wrong with the 1/
Tabulation so far. However, in the interest of transparency and so that people can have confidence in the tabulation, the decision was made to re-tabulate the ballots run through so far. That’s about 34,000 ballots give or take. So the machines are being zeroed out, and 2/
The ballots will be re-run. This will delay Milwaukee’s reporting. However, this was absolutely the right decision for them to make. And it was important to make this decision *before* the results were known. This is the right thing to do 3/
A brief primer on Election Day registration in Wisconsin! To register on ED, you need 2 pieces of information. 1st a photo ID to prove who you are & 2nd proof of residence (where you live). Let's dig in a little bit! 1/
The best source for what Photo ID is permissible is ! For most, but not all voters, it will be their WI Driver's license or ID. Students can use their student ID provided it has an expiration date (or, if expired, they have proof of enrollment). 2/bringit.wi.gov
Other allowable ID's include passport, Military ID, or tribal ID. Again - these ID's prove your IDENTITY. There's more info at the website. The ID does not need to have your current address (or any address). That's part 2 of the equation. 3/bringit.wi.gov
Friday afternoon Wisconsin election update: Friday was a great day for printing labels! We have continued our refreshing of the system and we have not had reports of label printing problems. We know many of you waited in long lines to vote & appreciate your patience!! 1/
We have been reviewing our systems closely and we are not seeing any other problems in our election administration system. This was not a cyberattack. This was an unfortunate printing problem that may have been exacerbated by the amazing volume of voters. 2/
Reminder - this label-printing problem does NOT have a role in election day administration. Labels are not printed on election day - they are only for absentee ballot envelopes. 3/