Post

More from @ScholarshipfPhd

Scholarship for PhD

@ScholarshipfPhd

Apr 23

The Tree of Knowledge – How All Disciplines Connect

The universe’s deepest truths are interconnected. Here’s how science, culture, and the human mind branch from the same trunk of inquiry.

-Thread-

1. Roots: Matter & Physical Sciences

🔬 Quantum Gravity: The quest to unify quantum mechanics and relativity.

⚛️ Physico-Chemical Algorithms: Laws governing particles, energy, and reactions.

Example: How hydrogen bonds shape DNA → life itself.

2. Trunk: Life & Biology

🧬 Bio-Genetic Algorithms: DNA’s code drives evolution (natural selection).

🌿 Living Systems: From cells to ecosystems, life self-organizes.

“What is life but matter’s rebellion against entropy?”

Read 8 tweets

Scholarship for PhD

@ScholarshipfPhd

Apr 23

How to Conduct a Literature Review – A Step-by-Step Guide for Researchers

- Thread-

1. What is a Literature Review?

A systematic analysis of existing research on your topic that:

✅ Establishes credibility: Shows you understand your field.

✅ Identifies gaps: Reveals what’s missing in current knowledge.

✅ Informs your framework: Shapes your research design, hypotheses, and methods.

It’s NOT just a summary—it’s a critical conversation with existing work.

2. Why is it Important?

Contextualizes your work: How does your study fit into the bigger picture?

Avoids duplication: Don’t reinvent the wheel—build on what’s known.

Strengthens arguments: Use prior evidence to justify your approach.

Example: Citing 10+ studies on vaccine hesitancy to frame your public health intervention.

Read 9 tweets

Scholarship for PhD

@ScholarshipfPhd

Apr 22

How to Identify & Fix Weaknesses in Your Research Paper

- Complete thread-

1/ Start with a Self-Audit

Ask:

❓ “Does my paper answer the research question clearly?”

❓ “Is my methodology replicable?”

❓ “Do results align with the hypothesis?”

Pro Tip: Read your paper aloud—awkward phrasing and gaps become obvious!

2/ Common Weaknesses & Fixes

🔸 Weak Literature Review

Fix: Add recent studies, critique existing gaps, and tie theories to your work.

🔸 Thin Methodology

Fix: Detail every step (sample size, tools, controls) so others can replicate.

🔸 Overstated Conclusions

Fix: Use hedging (“suggests,” “may indicate”) and acknowledge limitations

Read 8 tweets

Scholarship for PhD

@ScholarshipfPhd

Apr 21

What is a Problem Statement, really?

In academic writing, especially for peer-reviewed journals, a clear problem statement is crucial

but many manuscripts miss the mark.

Here's what makes a strong problem statement, and why it matters.👇

- Thread-

1/

Editors reviewing manuscripts often find problem statements to be absent, vague, or incomplete. This causes confusion:

👉 Is it a hypothesis?
👉 A study's purpose?
👉 A summary?

Spoiler: It’s none of those, entirely

2/

Over a decade ago, Hernon & Metoyer conducted research to define what makes an effective problem statement.

They identified 9 essential attributes. Here’s what you should include

✅ Clarity and precision
Avoid vague or sweeping statements. A well-written problem statement should be focused and responsible in its claims.

✅ Specificity
Clearly identify what is being studied—skip the fluff and value-laden language.

✅ An overarching question
What’s the big question driving your study? Also, define key variables.

✅ Key concepts and terms
Lay out your conceptual framework. Readers should know what terrain they’re navigating.

✅ Study boundaries
Set the parameters. What’s in? What’s out? This helps avoid scope creep.

✅ Generalizability
Can your findings apply beyond your study? If yes, how far?

✅ The “So What?” factor
Why does your study matter? Justify the significance, not just the topic.

✅ Avoid jargon
Write for clarity, not complexity. Plain language increases impact.

✅ Go beyond description
Don’t just summarize existing data—state the problem and its implications.

Read 5 tweets

Scholarship for PhD

@ScholarshipfPhd

Apr 20

Navigating Impostor Syndrome in Academia

1. Impostor Syndrome: What Is It?

Impostor syndrome is the feeling that you're not as capable as others think you are. It often involves doubting your abilities and feeling like a fraud. Even accomplished PhD students face this.

2. The Perfectionism Trap

Many PhD students fall into the perfectionism trap, believing they must get everything right on the first try. In academia, failure is part of the process.

👉 Perfectionism breeds self-doubt. It's okay to make mistakes – that’s how we learn.

3. You’re Not Alone in Feeling This Way

Over 70% of people experience impostor syndrome at some point in their lives. This includes highly successful academics, authors, and Nobel Prize winners!

👉 Yes, even THEY doubt themselves.

Read 11 tweets

Scholarship for PhD

@ScholarshipfPhd

Apr 19

How to Structure Your PhD Thesis – A Step-by-Step Guide

Structuring your PhD thesis can feel overwhelming, but breaking it down makes it manageable!

Here’s a clear, discipline-flexible blueprint to organize your work like a pro:

- Thread-

1. Standard Thesis Structure

Title Page: University guidelines, title, your name, supervisors.

Abstract: Summarize objectives, methods, key findings (150–300 words).

Acknowledgements: Thank mentors, funders, and supporters.

Table of Contents: Chapters, subheadings, page numbers.

List of Figures/Tables: If applicable.

2. Core Chapters
I. Introduction

Purpose: Set the stage.

What to Include:
Research problem, questions, and objectives.
Significance of the study (“Why does this matter?”).
Brief overview of methodology and thesis structure.

II. Literature Review

Purpose: Contextualize your work.

What to Include:

Critical analysis of existing research (not just summaries!).

Highlight gaps your thesis addresses.

Theoretical/conceptual framework guiding your study.

III. Methodology

Purpose: Explain how you did it.

What to Include:

Research design (qualitative/quantitative/mixed).
Data collection tools (surveys, interviews, experiments).

Sampling strategy, ethical considerations.
Analysis methods (software, statistical tests).

IV. Results

Purpose: Present raw findings.

What to Include:
Data (tables, graphs, charts) without interpretation.
Stick to facts – save analysis for the Discussion.

V. Discussion

Purpose: Interpret and connect.

What to Include:

Link results to research questions and literature.
Unexpected findings? Discuss why.
Limitations of your study.

VI. Conclusion

Purpose: Wrap it up.

What to Include:

Key takeaways and contributions to the field.
Practical implications (policy, industry, etc.).
Future research directions.

Read 7 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Scholarship for PhD

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @ScholarshipfPhd

Scholarship for PhD

Scholarship for PhD

Scholarship for PhD

Scholarship for PhD

Scholarship for PhD

Scholarship for PhD

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!