(1/19) 🚨⚠️ Vaccines Kill Babies. "SIDS" Is the Cover Story — A Thread
Officially, "sudden infant death syndrome" is a medical term for the unexplained death of a seemingly healthy infant. In reality, it typically means: “We don’t want to admit vaccines killed your baby.” 🧵👇
(2/19) As of 2022, the CDC lists SIDS is the third leading cause of infant death in the U.S.
Babies die suddenly—no prior signs of illness—and the system pretends not to know why.
They do. They just won’t admit it.
(3/19) Origin of “SIDS”
• Pre-1960s: No real use of terms like SIDS, cot death, or crib death.
• 1960s–70s: Sudden infant deaths rise → “SIDS” gains traction.
• 1973: CDC officially recognizes SIDS.
• 1975: ICD assigns a code to SIDS.
(4/19) SIDS Cases Rise as Infant Vaccination Expands
Before 1960s, infant vaccination was limited and inconsistent. ACIP formed in 1964, formalizing the schedule. By the 1970s, mass infant vaccination became the norm—and as shots flooded nurseries, SIDS diagnoses climbed.
(5/19) Vaccines for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and polio became systematically administered in the 1960s–70s.
Uptake rates hit 60–80%. SIDS diagnoses rose alongside.
(6/19) Proof That Vaccines Cause SIDS
Correlation isn’t causation—but when deaths consistently cluster hours or days after shots, it becomes a statistical impossibility if vaccines weren’t the cause. Lots of proof, below are just some salient data points.
(7/19) 1. SIDS Cases Cluster Shortly After Vaccination
50% of cases generally occur within 2 days of vaccination—most within a week. If vaccines weren’t involved, deaths would be more randomly distributed. They’re not.
(8/19) 2. More Vaccines = Higher Mortality
• 6–8 vaccine doses → much higher hospitalization & death rates vs. 1–4 doses (r² = 0.91).
• Infants who got 5–8 vaccines were 1.5x more likely to die than those who got fewer shots.
(9/19) 3. More Vaccines = Higher Mortality Worldwide
Study of 34 developed countries found: More infant vaccines = worse infant mortality.
The U.S. gives the most shots—and has the highest infant death rate.
(10/19) 4. Vaccines Disrupt Breathing and Heart Function in Preemies
Vaccines can trigger life-threatening apnea and bradycardia in preemies. Study found:
• Before vaccination: 1/98 preemies had apnea/bradycardia
• After vaccination: 17/98.
29% needed respiratory support.
(11/19) The Cover-up
The medical establishment didn’t just invent the label “SIDS” to explain away vaccine deaths—an entire infrastructure was built to ensure the true cause would never be officially acknowledged.
(12/19) Suppressing Dissent
Since the 1980s, it’s been U.S. policy to suppress any info that could undermine vaccine confidence—even if true.
They admit it in writing.
(13/19) Doctors who space out shots risk losing their licenses.
Researchers who link vaccines to SIDS are blacklisted.
Journals refuse to publish dissent.
Media either vilifies or ignores it.
(14/19) Blaming Parents
Vaccines were off-limits as a cause of death, so blame shifted to parents. The 1994 “Back to Sleep” campaign pinned SIDS on sleep position—hiding vaccine harm and making deaths seem “preventable.”
(15/19) The Diagnostic Shell Game
To hide vaccine deaths, the medical system changes diagnostic criteria and renames causes. SIDS was quietly replaced with labels like “suffocation,” “positional asphyxia,” and “undetermined” to shift blame and blur the truth.
(16/19) In the early 2000s, SIDS rates fell—but infant deaths hardly did. Labels just changed. 90% of the SIDS decline from 1999–2001 was due to reclassification as “unknown causes” and “suffocation,” not real progress.
(17/19) By constantly shifting diagnostic criteria and inventing new labels, the medical establishment conceals vaccine-caused deaths. This kind of diagnostic sleight of hand is nothing new—it’s a standard trick in the medical establishment’s playbook.
Meet the CDC vaccine "experts" RFK Jr. just fired 🤡
These are the people who tell pediatricians which toxic metals to inject into your children.
Good summary of this 2018 ACIP meeting from @catsscareme2021:
Q: Is it safe to use vaccines containing other adjuvants along with the new vaccine?
A: We don't know. We didn't study it. But our "general approach to immunizations" is that it's fine.
-----
Q: Do we have any safety data from other countries that are already using vaccines containing this adjuvant?
A: Nah.
----
Great! Let's vote! *Vaccine is approved unanimously* Hooray! Thanks, everyone!
----
ACIP member with sudden attack of conscience: Even though I just voted to give this vaccine to every US adult over the age of 18, I am concerned about the risk of heart attack associated with the use of this vaccine.
ACIP member with sudden attack of conscience #2: So...how soon will we know if the people we just voted to give this vaccine to are dropping dead of heart attacks?
FDA: Two years. We also think there may be a risk of autoimmune diseases and shingles, and we're also going to give it to pregnant women in the general population to see how that goes.
The corruption and conflicts of interest are obscene.
I haven’t done a thread on the CDC yet, but every vaccine goes through the FDA first — and its vaccine panels are so corrupt, they make the rest of the FDA look like choir practice.
(1/11) Good to see The MAHA Report affirming:
• The medical journals are corrupt.
• The research is junk.
• And your doctor doesn’t know the difference.
Some highlights from the section titled: “Distorting Scientific Literature”
(2/11) The report flags some of the key lies baked into medical training, eg:
• Research focuses on real health problems
• Journals are trustworthy
• Peer reviewers are honest gatekeepers
All false. All taught as gospel.
(3/11) In reality:
• 97% of top-cited clinical trials are industry-funded
• Journals don’t get full data—only what drug companies choose to show them
• Peer reviewers are ineffective and often financially tied to pharma
(1/28) 🚨⚠️ Insiders admit what your doctor never will: Modern medicine is a fraud — Thread
In a sane world, the overwhelming evidence would be enough to convince anyone. But most people don’t care about evidence—they just trust the “experts.”
This thread is for them. 🧵👇
(2/28) My Substack article makes the full case—with links to sources and more. This thread covers the key points. open.substack.com/pub/drwojakmd/…
(3/28) The Emperor Admits He Has No Clothes
What follows is a collection of damning admissions from some of the most authoritative figures in medical science—editors of top medical journals, including The Lancet, NEJM, BMJ, JAMA, and more.