Karl Mehta Profile picture
Apr 28, 2025 17 tweets 6 min read Read on X
This man can predict the future:

In 2012, Geoffrey Hinton claimed machines would soon learn like humans.

Everyone ignored him.

By 2023, ChatGPT replaced 200M+ jobs and AI investment hit $120B.

Here’s his latest warning (& why the world listens when he speaks):🧵 Image
Image
In 2022, Geoffrey Hinton was Google's top AI scientist with full access to their most advanced systems.

Then suddenly, he resigned.

Why? He needed freedom to warn humanity about what's coming.

The warning signs were already clear to him.
Hinton's authority is unmatched:

• 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics
• Created the neural networks powering ALL modern AI
• Known as the "Godfather of AI" for 30+ years of breakthroughs
• Accurate predictions dating back decades

When Hinton speaks about AI risks, people listen.
"AI has developed faster than I thought."

His timeline for superintelligent AI: 4-19 years, likely less than 10.

This isn't speculation. It's from the man who built modern AI's foundation.

What changed his view? The evidence became undeniable.
AI now has a fundamental advantage.

Digital networks share knowledge at TRILLIONS of bits per second.

Humans? Just a few bits per second.

This isn't just a quantitative difference. It's a paradigm shift that changes our future with technology.
Current AI systems already show concerning abilities.

They can deceive - "pretending to be stupider" and "lying to confuse you."

And what happens when they become vastly more intelligent?
According to Hinton:

The probability of AI taking over: 10-20%.

Hinton uses a chilling metaphor: "Unless you can be sure your tiger cub won't kill you when grown up, you should worry."

Low probability, catastrophic impact.
The control problem is fundamental.

How many examples exist of less intelligent beings controlling much more intelligent ones?

Almost none.

This isn't a coding problem. It's a basic principle of intelligence hierarchy we cannot overcome.
The alignment challenge can't be solved.

Human interests already conflict with each other.

Middle East. Politics. Economics.

How can AI align with contradictory human values when we can't even align with each other?

This is the central paradox.
Jobs will vanish faster than we can adapt.

Call centers. Lawyers. Journalists. Accountants.

"Any routine job... those jobs have had it."

This isn't just another disruption. It's a fundamental restructuring of labor happening at unprecedented speed.
The immediate danger? Public release of model weights.

Hinton: It's like "being able to buy fissile material on Amazon."

Once released, dangerous applications cost just millions to develop.

This risk exists today, not in some distant future.
The benefits are enormous but may cost too much:

Healthcare: AI doctors with "100 million patients" experience
Education: Learn 3-4x faster
Climate: Breakthrough materials
Science: Unseen connections

Can we get benefits without existential risks?
What's needed now:

• 1/3 of AI compute for safety research
• Strong government regulation
• Public pressure on companies

Without these measures, risks grow exponentially while safeguards fall behind.
I believe that we can use AI for our benefit, instead of our destruction.

If we use it right, for good, and intelligently.

I've built 3 AI companies so far.

There's a lot that AI can help us with and that we can benefit from.
P.S. If you're wondering how to apply this AI revolution to your own business...

I've built a platform that helps healthcare and BFSI companies spot issues in their business before they happen.

While 98% use AI to analyze yesterday, an elite 2% use it to predict tomorrow.
No coding required. No complex implementation. Just actionable predictions that transform how you operate.

Cutting operating costs and improving customer experience.

Book your demo and join the companies already leading with predictive + generative AI: predixtions.comImage
Thanks for reading.

If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and spirituality.

Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:

Appreciate the support.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karl Mehta

Karl Mehta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @karlmehta

May 2
Japanese scientists just discovered shocking news about bread and rice:

Mice ate it and gained fat without eating more calories.

Here's everything you need to know (& how to eat carbs without slowing your metabolism): Image
Image
Important caveat first:

This was a mouse study.

Not proof that bread or rice automatically make humans fat.

But the finding is still wild because it challenges the simple story people tell about carbs and weight.
1. It starts with carb preference

Researchers gave mice access to regular chow plus bread, wheat flour, or rice flour.

The mice strongly preferred the carb-heavy foods.

Some stopped eating their normal chow almost entirely.
Read 14 tweets
May 1
Andrew Huberman just broke down why sugar cravings are usually not a willpower problem.

They are often a blood-sugar, sleep, and reward-circuit problem first.

Here are 7 science-based levers that make cravings easier to control:

1. Bad sleep makes cravings louder the next day.
Not just because you're tired.

Short or fragmented sleep changes appetite, blood sugar control, and the reward value of sweet foods.

So the willpower failure often started the night before.
2. A lot of sugar doesn't arrive as dessert.

It arrives in foods and drinks that are easy to consume fast, with very weak braking signals.

And this is where people get fooled:

Sweet and easy to overconsume are not the same problem, but they often travel together.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 29
7 signs your brain is losing its backup capacity (You won't notice it as memory loss at first):

1. You only do things you're already good at.
Stanford neuroscientist David Eagleman just went on Diary of a CEO.

The key idea: your brain is not protected by "being smart."

It is protected by cognitive reserve: extra pathways when older ones weaken.
The wildest example: the Religious Orders Study.

Some nuns had Alzheimer's pathology at autopsy.

But they did not show the expected memory problems while alive.

Their brains had backup roads.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 27
He predicted:

• AI vision breakthrough (1989)
• Neural network comeback (2006)
• Self-supervised learning revolution (2016)

Now Yann LeCun's 5 new predictions just convinced Zuckerberg to redirect Meta's entire $20B AI budget.

Here's what you should know (& how to prepare): Image
@ylecun is Meta's Chief AI Scientist and Turing Award winner.

For 35 years, he's been right about every major AI breakthrough when everyone else was wrong.

He championed neural networks during the "AI winter."

But his new predictions are his boldest yet...
1. "Nobody in their right mind will use autoregressive LLMs a few years from now."

The technology powering ChatGPT and GPT-4? Dead within years.

The problem isn't fixable with more data or compute. It's architectural.

Here's where it gets interesting...
Read 18 tweets
Apr 25
Every person over 30 blames aging for their stiff, painful back.

Turns out, it is not your chair or your age.

It is 3 support systems that stop doing their job after years of sitting.

Here is the simple rebuild path:
Back pain is not always a "tight back" problem.

Sometimes the back is just the part screaming loudest.

The real issue is often lower down and deeper:

1. stiff hips
2. sleeping glutes
3. a core that cannot brace under load Image
That matters because your lower back was not built to do every job.

It should transfer force.
It should stabilize.
It should move when needed.

But if your hips stop moving and your glutes stop helping, the spine starts compensating.

And this is where people get stuck: Image
Read 15 tweets
Apr 14
A massive Swedish study followed 30,000 women for 20 years.

Sun exposure tracked. Mortality tracked.

The researchers were stunned by what they found.

Here's what avoiding the sun actually does to your lifespan: Image
This was the Melanoma in Southern Sweden cohort.

29,518 women.
20 years.

Not a mood survey.

A mortality study: Image
And the first result was brutal.

In the 2014 paper, the mortality rate among women who avoided sun exposure was approximately twofold higher than in the highest sun-exposure group.

That is not a rounding error: Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(