We're short $QBTS. Report at . D-Wave is not true quantum computing, its core tech – quantum annealing – is a commercial dead end abandoned by rest of industry. 20 yrs of ops & financials are pathetic, only massive share dilution has kept it afloat 1/9kerr.co/qbts
$QBTS strategy relies on so-called “hybrid solvers” for optimization problems – which sounds like a combination of quantum and classical but according to former insiders is “almost entirely classical” with quantum little more than a marketing gimmick 2/9
$QBTS deliberately hides the mix of classical/quantum to customers 🚩🚩🚩 but still charges a massive premium for the quantum “brand.” Even formers admitted being uncomfortable with the practice 3/9
We interviewed multiple customers in manufacturing, pharma & logistics who said $QBTS tech provides little/no benefit vs classical. No wonder $QBTS client growth is stalled. Former $QBTS engineer admitted “there is no proof” D-Wave can solve an optimization problem faster than classical
Real-world problems don’t encode neatly in $QBTS’s annealer. The process bloats problem size, burns qubits, and adds instability. More than 90% of quantum resources can be spent just representing the problem –
not solving it 4/9
D-Wave’s solvers don’t scale well. D-Wave systems choke on real-world problems, needing massive qubit overhead just to represent constraints. Classical solvers outperform them – and cost a lot less 5/9
D-Wave reversed its anti-gate model stance in 2021 and began developing its own... but 3+ years later: no roadmap, no benchmarks, no data. Just vibes. The rest of the industry is sprinting toward gate-model quantum. D-Wave has been left behind 6/9
Quantum supremacy? Not quite. D-Wave’s "real-world" breakthrough claimed last month was a toy problem tailored to its hardware. The only thing it simulated accurately was marketing spin 7/9
D-Wave trades at over 50x 2026E consensus revenue – 128x by our estimate. Pure delusion for a company with narrow commercial relevance, flat customer growth and zero path to profitability 8/9
Investing in any public quantum computing co requires betting on the right architecture. D-Wave's annealing tech is not the future — it's a historical footnote the rest of the industry has left behind 📜
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We're short $IONQ. Report at . Massive scaling challenges & reliance on photonic interconnects means the co is nowhere close to producing a commercially viable product. As reality sets in on the quantum computing bubble, $IONQ remains wildly inflated 1/7kerr.co/ionq
4Q results included an unexpected management change, dilutive capital raise, and looming overhauls to the tech roadmap and benchmarks – obv signs of problems at $IONQ and that’s before the CEO cashed out $37m in stock at only $18 bucks 2/7
$IONQ spins recent quantum networking M&A as strategic, but as a former $IONQ exec told us, the company had no way to deliver on exponential growth promises in computing due to monumental tech hurdles. It needed a quick way to gin up interim revenue and distract investors 3/7
We're short $RCAT. Report available at . RCAT stock is up 800% and $900M over nine months on excitement for the supposedly HUGE SRR contract. Red Cat says it's a sole-source contract worth hundreds of millions of $ over 5 years and $80M next year (1/9)kerr.co/rcat
But the SRR contract is much smaller: $20-25M/year at most according to Army budget docs. Army officials also say that the replacement cycle will be every 2-3 years and product specs require open system compatibility with new vendors, which will be reconsidered each cycle (2/9)
$RCAT has been talking up big follow on-sales with an Army stamp of approval. But the Marines already have an infantry drone, the Air Force has no infantry, and other govt agencies (DOI, DHS, CBP) have tiny budgets for new drones and/or have chosen cheaper brands. (3/9)
We're short $OKLO. Report at . $OKLO’s claimed unit economics are nonsensical, its mgmt are academics with weak real world commercialization experience, its tech / engineering team dramatically trails peers and its projected timelines are laughable 1/7kerr.co/oklo
News that an $OKLO board member may be appointed Energy Secretary have caused shares to rebound 25% after a disappointing 3Q biz update, but nothing has changed $OKLO’s fundamental lack of design readiness and commercially nonviable unproven reactors. 2/7
Substitute $OKLO’s outlandish $7k/kg HALEU assumption for a more realistic $30k (confirmed by ex Oklo employee) & Oklo’s professed IRRs/promises of competitive economics implode. According to an expert, “if they put real numbers of today in there this program would be over" 3/
We're short $LUMN. Report at . Despite 400% stock rise in recent weeks, AI can't save this dying, overlevered legacy telecom. The newly announced deals won't reverse worsening sales and margin trends amid a staggering debt burden. Equity is worthless. 1/8kerr.co/lumn
Building AI-driven “Custom Networks” for $MSFT and other large tech cos is just marketing spin for a massive construction project that only nets $LUMN ~$800m in cash over ~3 yrs and does little to solve its fundamental lack of growth and $19b in debt. 2/8
Lumen shares have risen $5 despite deals worth only ~$1/shr in largely non-recurring value. $LUMN just reported EBITDA -13% and guided next year’s EBITDA to be lower y/y, yet amazingly is valued in line with growing, dividend-paying telco peers. 3/8
Today, we launch a war against bitcoin miners, an industry of snake oil salesmen that are incinerating both investor capital and the environment and should be banished from America much like the Chinese RTO frauds that we helped kick out a decade ago (1/10)
We begin by issuing two letters to Texas state officials:
Letter to Navarro city commission:
Letter to Texas state senators:
Like other US listed miners, $RIOT’s biz model is a dysfunctional hamster wheel of cash burn, which is why it loots retail shareholders with non-stop ATM issuance to fund operations. Even with $BTC near all-time highs, post-halving $RIOT’s mining ops aren’t profitable (3/10)
GM. We're short $MSTR and long bitcoin. Report avail at . Crypto trades often get carried away and $MSTR is no exception. The BTC price implied in $MSTR shares is now over $177k, an unjustifiable 2.6x the spot price of BTC. (1/6)kerr.co/mstr
No fundamental reason for this level of premium exists. $MSTR doesn’t provide unique access to bitcoin. Buying BTC in the equity markets is easy and cheap through an ever-growing number of low fee ETPs and ETFs like $IBIT and $FBTC. (2/6)
Bitcoin accounts for 97% of $MSTR’s valuation; its software business is tiny relative to its bitcoin hoard. If $MSTR’s bitcoin is valued at current prices, the stock is worth $700-$800, or -60% lower than MicroStrategy’s present share price. (3/6)