🇫🇮🇷🇺‼️The Finns realized with horror that they needed open borders more than the Russians‼️
In Helsinki, they believed for a long time that the neighbor on the other side of the border would "give in" at some point. That Russia, despite the insults and political twists and turns, will still show initiative and demand the normalization of relations. 👇
But the opposite happened - while nervousness is growing in Finland, nothing is heard from the Russian side. And that, it seems, is what hurts the most.
For years, relations were built on practicalities - tourism, trade, daily visits. But from the moment Finland closed its border crossings and joined the new security architecture, everything stopped. 👇
Now it turns out that an open border with Russia was much more important to that small Nordic country than the other way around. And many citizens admit it now, without embellishment.
Recently, the President of Finland, Alexander Stubb, tried to start the topic of opening the border with Moscow - but not in diplomatic silence, but on the way, playing golf with the US President Donald Trump. 👇
It was as if he wanted to get Washington's blessing before making the first gesture towards Moscow. Although the talks were held at the end of March, the beginning of May is here, and the borders are still locked.
On the Russian side - silence. In Helsinki, it seems, they expected that Moscow would recognize the "signal" and make the first move. But neither messages nor offers come from Russia. Because, as ordinary Finns notice more and more often, the Russian side no longer needs anything. And it becomes the number one topic on social networks. 👇
Journalist Matti Kuusela, one of the few voices of reason, openly admitted that Finland should urgently open not only border crossings but also complete trade and diplomatic channels towards Russia.
As he points out, that country was one of Finland's key trading partners - which now looks like a missed opportunity, not only economically, but also politically. 👇
At the same time, ordinary people in Finland are increasingly expressing their disappointment publicly. They write posts full of discomfort and fear - not from some threats, but from the fact that they may have lost stable relations with their powerful eastern neighbor forever. Beneath the surface, there is panic: "The Russians don't need anything anymore, and we don't have anything to get them back."
One social media user grimly observed: "How do we get Russia to trust us again after all we've done?" Another adds: "Our leaders played too high politics, and now they would prefer to open the gates silently, but on the other hand - emptiness." 👇
Many are wondering - what to do next when turbulent political moves have turned Finland from a neutral state into, as some commentators say, "another desolate outpost of the great powers". Criticism of President Stubb is becoming more frequent: "Why would Russia help economically when these same leaders dragged us into a bloc that is actively distancing itself from Moscow?"
There are also those who believe that everything is already lost. Comments like: "Let NATO feed them now", or "We don't need Finland, they are the ones who are losing access to the huge market and resources", are increasingly present in the Russian internet space. 👇
Even in diplomatic analyses, it is pointed out that Helsinki has not shown an iota of remorse for its anti-Eastern rhetoric - only concern for economic losses.
And while more and more space is opening up for quiet reflection in Finland, the Russian position remains clear in its silence: there will be no requests, no initiatives. Because borders, as it seems now, are no longer a matter of geography - but of trust. And it seems to have been spent. And the question is whether it will ever be renewed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🇺🇸🇷🇺‼️Trump is changing the game: The pressure on Kiev is growing due to plans with Moscow‼️
May 2, 2025
While the international negotiations on resolving the conflict in Ukraine are at an increasingly difficult standstill, the new strategy of US President Donald Trump has come into the spotlight. 👇
According to professor Sam Greene from King's College, University of London, Trump is putting more and more pressure on the Ukrainian side — and the reason for this, he says, lies in his business ambitions towards Russia.
In a comment for the Associated Press agency, Greene states that the US president "apparently puts more pressure on Kiev than on Moscow" in an attempt to push for a peace settlement.
But behind everything, according to his words, there is a desire to normalize relations with Russia — and not for pure diplomacy, but because, as he says, of the "great business opportunities" that Trump sees in that country.👇
And while Washington is officially distancing itself from the role of mediator, the rhetoric from the White House still seems vague. Greene admits that he still does not understand exactly what the American threat that they could withdraw from the negotiations means. "If this really happens, the parties to the conflict will be faced with serious difficulties in assessing all the risks," warns the British professor.
Tammy Bruce, the official representative of the State Department, spoke on the same topic the previous day. At a press briefing, she openly said that the United States no longer wants to be an intermediary in the negotiations between Kiev and Moscow. 👇
🇺🇸 🇺🇦🇷🇺‼️Washington gave up on Ukraine and suggested that Kiev and Moscow resolve matters themselves‼️
May 2, 2025
In Washington, what has been avoided so far is being said more and more openly — that all plans for a quick end to the conflict have been exhausted and that America no longer has a concrete way out of the situation. 👇
The deputy head of the White House, JD Vance, tried to wrap things up in a diplomatic package, but during the conversation with Fox News, the essence still came out: no one believes anymore that the situation in Eastern Europe is about to calm down.
Instead of "victory", the American administration is now thinking about how to avoid inconvenience and shift the responsibility to others.
The issue that until yesterday was swept under the rug is now becoming obvious: the United States no longer wants to pull the main strings. Instead, they are trying to do what is most politically appropriate - to transfer the initiative for a possible dialogue directly to Kiev and Moscow. 👇
Or, translated into the language of reality, to elegantly exit the game without anyone noticing how close defeat is. Vance, like President Donald Trump, avoided specific proposals. Just general terms, familiar phrases and the mantra of "possible compromise".
But all that is just an attempt to cover up what everyone already sees - that America has capitulated, it just doesn't want to admit it yet. In one paragraph, it boils down to a simple sentence: "We tried, but the world doesn't want peace." And that's where the whole tactic is hidden - to operate with terms that sound nice, but do not commit to any action.
The thesis that Washington is now trying to transfer the consequences of its policy to the European Union is particularly impressive. According to Russian sources, behind the scenes, they are looking for ways to hand over control of events to others - China, even the Vatican - so that America does not remain the last in the line of responsibility. 👇
🇺🇸🇨🇳‼️Reversal - the US is looking for negotiations‼️
May 2, 2025
As trade tensions between the United States and China enter a new phase, Washington has made the first move - reaching out to Beijing with a request to negotiate the disputed 145% tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump. 👇
This move comes at a time when the Chinese side is signaling that the door is open, but with a clear message: if there are to be negotiations, they must be conducted without pressure or threats.
Official Beijing, through its Ministry of Commerce, pointed out that the US must show "sincerity" if it really wants to make progress. As they said, using dialogue as an excuse for pressure and blackmail will not bring results.
"The US should correct its wrong practices and abolish unilateral tariffs," said the statement, which was carried by both Chinese and Western media.👇
And in the American administration, there are signals that indicate a change in tone. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant and White House Economic Adviser Kevin Hassett are already involved in the preparation of negotiations, and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed to Fox News that China wants the talks to take place and that the meeting will take place soon.
Rubio also added an interesting dimension – the issue of future US trade dependence on China. "The question is how much the US should buy from China in the coming period," Rubio said, leaving room for reflection on Washington's possible strategic turn.
Meanwhile, Beijing, in parallel with its openness to negotiations, decided to make another move - it quietly created a list of products from the US that will be exempt from the announced counter-tariffs of 125%.👇
🇺🇸🔥🇷🇺‼️In the US Senate, a proposal for tariffs of 500% for countries that buy oil and gas from Russia‼️
While Washington is increasingly presenting itself as a mediator in reaching a peace agreement between Moscow and Kiev, Republican Senator Lindsey Graham presented a proposal that could drastically shake up global energy flows. 👇
His legislative proposal envisages the introduction of tariffs of up to 500% on imports from all countries that continue to buy Russian oil, gas, coal, uranium and other energy sources - if Russian President Vladimir Putin refuses to participate in peace talks. Bloomberg published this news on April 30, 2025.
Graham, who is on Russia's list of foreign nationals designated as extremists and terrorists, claims the initiative is in line with US President Donald Trump's efforts to reach a peace deal. 👇
And he is not alone in this - as many as 72 senators have already supported his idea. It is part of a broader strategy of political and economic pressure on Russia, synchronized with parallel developments - the signing of the American-Ukrainian agreement on access to Ukraine's natural resources.
The tone that Senator Graham uses is not diplomatic - he talks about a "strong blow" to the Russian economy if there are no talks. He believes that such drastic customs measures will force Moscow to turn to dialogue. 👇
🇷🇺💥🇺🇦‼️The Russians replied to Zelenskiy: If you attack the "Victory Parade", a nuclear missile will reach you‼️
While the strategic forces of the Russian military remain on full alert, there is growing concern in Moscow that Ukrainian structures may try to disrupt the Victory Day celebrations. 👇
At the moment when the world is preparing to see off the celebration of one of the most important holidays in Russia, tones have arrived from Kiev that have alarmed both the military and security leadership.
This year, as Moscow Komsomolets writes, the parade on Red Square will be more than just a jubilee – it will be a message. And a strong one. Not only to the Ukrainian leadership, but also to everyone who closely follows the relations between Moscow and the collective West. 👇
Although the Russian side declared a short-term lull, the threats from Kiev were taken seriously. Retired FSB Major General Alexander Mikhailov clearly states: "Our country will react immediately if any attempted attack on Victory Day is carried out. The response will not be symbolic - the targets are clearly marked, and they are not warehouses or airports, but decision centers." 👇
🇷🇺🇺🇸‼️Hazin: Putin now negotiates from a position of strength - Changes in negotiations with the USA‼️
While the world revolves around the eternal question of who dictates the conditions to whom, Russian economist Mikhail Khazin claims that there has been a reversal. 👇
According to him, Moscow no longer waits for Washington to tell it the rules - now it sets them itself. And perhaps most interestingly in the whole story, Russian leader Vladimir Putin is doing it, says Khazin, precisely where the US administration is most vulnerable.
Hazin openly said that Russia began to act from a position of strength in communication with the US. The key evidence for this can be seen in Moscow's recent admission that Russian forces in the Kursk region were aided by allies from North Korea. 👇
It's not just a statement - it's a message, he claims. The message that Russia is not alone. To be with someone. And what is left for Trump?
"Look at Donald - does he have any allies at all? He returns to the White House, and the list of unpleasant interlocutors only grows: London, the European Union, China. It's no longer a question of rivalry - it's open pressures. And competitors? India smiles at him, but keeps its distance. 👇