For the first time in 125 years, elections in NC will no longer be overseen by a governor elected by the people, but by partisan operatives handpicked by a Republican state auditor, thanks to an anonymous, unexplained, two-sentence court order. 🧵
The new Republican-controlled board will now oversee every election in all 100 counties—including a still-disputed Supreme Court race that @AllisonJRiggs won, where GOP judges ordered thousands of ballots be discarded. The timing is not a coincidence. It’s a setup.
Let’s be clear: the people of North Carolina voted against this power grab—repeatedly. Courts had already ruled it unconstitutional. But Republicans waited for a lame-duck window, rammed it through, and found partisan judges willing to rubber-stamp it in secret.
Republicans played a shell game to do this. When courts ruled that taking elections oversight from the governor violated the separation of powers, they simply swapped out the defendant. Instead of giving control to the legislature directly, they handed it to the state auditor.
The state auditor is a Republican who just so happens to be in the executive branch. It’s a cynical workaround designed to pass constitutional muster on paper while gutting it in practice. The branch hasn’t changed. The motive hasn’t changed. Only the name. This isn’t governance.
This move is a bad-faith legal charade, and it insults every North Carolinian who believes elections should be decided by voters—not by partisan lawyers playing musical chairs with our democracy.
And Boliek? He could have declined to participate in this sham. He could have refused to wield power obtained through a rushed, opaque, and legally dubious ruling. But instead, he rushed to name partisan appointees before even filling the legally required Democratic seats.
Boliek is not a neutral actor. He’s a willing participant in the erosion of democratic norms. And where is the North Carolina Supreme Court in all this? Silent. The governor asked them to intervene to pause this power grab before it took effect. They have not yet acted at all.
This is how democracy dies in real time: not with tanks in the street, but with courts that do nothing, officials who know better and stay quiet, and power handed to those who will never give it back. North Carolina is not the exception. It’s the test case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As a N.C. native, former N.C. Supreme Court law clerk, & advocate for civic fairness, I am disgusted by the spectacle unfolding in the halls of the state’s highest court. It released this order tonight, , w/ an awful concurrence by Chief Justice Newby. 🧵rb.gy/nqceab
As I have warned before, regrettably, a cabal of self-serving Republican jurists seeks to subvert the will of the people through legal chicanery and political gamesmanship. Sadly, these are robed enablers of authoritarianism plotting to override the democratic process.
J. @AllisonJRiggs won the election. North Carolinians rejected her opponent, Judge Jefferson Griffin. Since the day he was declared the loser, he has engaged in a naked partisan ploy to overturn the will of the people by abusing the court system. It’s disgraceful & repugnant.
In State v. Daw, the Republican majority on the NC Supreme Court has fundamentally altered and reshaped habeas corpus, a critical shield against government overreach that empowers prisoners to challenge the legality of their confinement. A 🧵 on the opinion and what it means.
Phillip Brandon Daw was sentenced to prison in 2019. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, Mr. Daw filed a habeas corpus petition arguing that the conditions in the prison where he was held put him at risk of serious illness due to his asthma, violating his constitutional rights.
The trial court denied Mr. Daw's petition relying on N.C.G.S. § 17-4(2), which says a habeas application should be denied when the petitioner is "committed or detained by virtue of the final order, judgment or decree of a competent tribunal of civil or criminal jurisdiction."
In a 62-page scorcher, J. Reeves methodically incinerates qualified immunity (QI) as having "no basis in law" & being an "extra-constitutional affront." This opinion could finally spell the end for the doctrine. REQUIRED READING for all who yearn for accountability & justice. 🧵
Here, , J. Reeves denies dismissal in a case where a Black man lost nearly 2 years m of his life awaiting trial in an "inhumane" detention center, due to a false murder accusation based solely on the discredited testimony of a drug-impaired informant.s3.documentcloud.org/documents/2467…
What’s more, the detective in the case ignored exonerating evidence & manipulated a lineup. Mr. Green sued Detective Thomas, along with other defendants, under § 1983 for violating his civil rights. Detective Thomas filed a motion to dismiss based on QI.
🚨🚨🚨 Today, the N.C. Supreme Court issued its opinion in Washington v. Cline. The majority opinion was authored by J. Dietz and the Court’s four other conservatives. J. @Anita_Earls dissented, with J. @AllisonJRiggs joining. This case is very important. See thread and SHARE!!🧵
It raises legal issues about whether dismissing criminal charges fully remedies constitutional harms from a speedy trial violation or if additional civil remedies are sometimes needed to fully redress injuries that criminal processes cannot address alone.
The case involves Frankie Delano Washington, who brought a civil lawsuit alleging violations of his right to a speedy trial under the state constitution.He argued that the 5-year delay between his arrest & trial prejudiced his defense & impaired his ability to challenge evidence.
🚨🚨 🗳️ Primary elections are underway in NC! My job does not allow me to endorse a candidate (there are 2) for the NC Supreme Court race. In lieu of an endorsement, I offer this advice: carefully evaluate the candidates based on their records and values. Why does this matter?🧵
The NC Supreme Court is the highest court in the state and acts as the ultimate authority on matters of state law. It plays a critical role in safeguarding our rights, particularly when it comes to important legal questions of public significance and constitutional importance.
Because the role of the NC Supreme Court is to uphold the state Constitution, protect our rights, and ensure a fair and impartial judicial system, it’s essential to elect a candidate with a track record of defending these principles through their actions as an attorney and judge.
🚨🚨🚨Based on today's oral arguments in Leandro in the N.C. Supreme Court, it appears evident that the Court (except for J. @Anita_Earls & J. @AllisonJRiggs) is will overturn Leandro IV. This is devastating for the state’s children and further erodes the court’s integrity. 🧵
Some questions from certain justices seemed like mere fig leafs to conceal their true motives, which is to secure a political victory for the Republican-controlled legislature.
Let me put it plainly for you.
This potential decision could allow the legislature to persist in denying children their right to a sound basic education and to maintain a budget surplus, which directly contradicts the state constitution. It would nullify the judgment of Leandro IV, which is barely a year old.