Tulsi Gabbard’s new interview with Megyn Kelly is going viral.
And she’s NOT just talking about border security.
She just uncovered a classified intel leak, a buried pandemic link, and a secret fight to stop Trump.
Here’s what you should know (before this story disappears): 🧵
It began with a strategic intelligence leak to The Washington Post.
Classified information about border enforcement was selectively released.
Critical context about Venezuela's role was deliberately omitted from what the public saw.
This wasn't accidental - it was calculated...
Gabbard described how it happened:
Officials cherry-picked parts of a 6-page intelligence document on Venezuela's Tren Aragua gang.
They excluded FBI confirmation that Venezuela's government supports the gang's US operations.
This selective disclosure had a purpose.
This isn't the first time intelligence has been weaponized.
Remember the "Russia collusion" narrative?
The "Hunter Biden laptop is Russian disinformation" letter?
Each example follows the same playbook: selective leaks to shape public opinion and policy.
Gabbard's response marks a historic shift:
Three criminal referrals to DOJ, eleven more investigations underway.
More significant: She's documenting systematic abuses so reforms can be implemented that survive beyond any single administration.
The COVID revelations are even more significant.
Gabbard established a "Director's Initiative Group" with a specific mission:
Investigate pandemic origins thoroughly.
Their findings connect to US government funding decisions.
What they uncovered:
US taxpayer dollars funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.
This research likely created COVID-19.
Meanwhile, Fauci repeatedly denied this connection under oath to Congress.
Consider the scale of this cover-up:
Fauci sought a "preemptive pardon" before leaving office.
Scientists questioning the natural origin theory were systematically smeared.
Intelligence assessments were altered to support the preferred narrative.
Truth became a casualty of bureaucratic self-preservation.
When intelligence agencies become political actors, accountability vanishes.
We've seen this pattern throughout history – from the Church Committee revelations to the Iraq WMD intelligence failure.
The consequences? Policy disasters and eroded public trust.
The resistance to Trump goes beyond isolated incidents:
"They are very unwilling to come to a view or express an opinion on some things, but in other cases, they quickly come to assumptions without evidence."
This pattern affects critical security decisions.
A clear example:
When Trump declared Tren Aragua gang an "incursion" justifying deportations, officials leaked claims that no Venezuela connection existed.
But they deliberately concealed FBI evidence confirming that exact relationship.
The pattern extends throughout the system:
Intelligence briefings to Congress often contained information "already read about in the newspaper."
Important security decisions undermined through selective leaks.
A systematic effort against elected leadership.
Meanwhile, Gabbard discovered resources being diverted:
Intelligence analysts required to spend half their workday on DEI initiatives to get promotions.
$170 million allocated to DEI programs she's now redirecting toward security priorities.
One particularly concerning example:
An NSA chat group discussing explicit sexual content operated for over two years.
When whistleblowers reported it, they were silenced by DEI policies.
"Filed a written report with evidence...and basically told, 'Shut up.'"
The evidence points to a consistent pattern:
A government operating within the government.
Intelligence manipulated for partisan purposes.
Whistleblowers silenced.
Presidential policies systematically undermined.
As Gabbard said: "They are actually undermining our democracy."
The ultimate insight from Gabbard's revelations?
Our national security apparatus requires a complete cultural reset.
As she put it: "This speaks to the huge culture shift, the mindset shift that has to take place here."
A return to mission, accountability, and public service.
Thanks for reading.
If you enjoyed this post, follow @karlmehta for more content on AI and politics.
Repost the first tweet to help more people see it:
In 2012, Geoffrey Hinton claimed machines would soon learn like humans.
Everyone ignored him.
By 2023, ChatGPT replaced 200M+ jobs and AI investment hit $120B.
Here’s his latest warning (& why the world listens when he speaks):🧵
In 2022, Geoffrey Hinton was Google's top AI scientist with full access to their most advanced systems.
Then suddenly, he resigned.
Why? He needed freedom to warn humanity about what's coming.
The warning signs were already clear to him.
Hinton's authority is unmatched:
• 2023 Nobel Prize in Physics
• Created the neural networks powering ALL modern AI
• Known as the "Godfather of AI" for 30+ years of breakthroughs
• Accurate predictions dating back decades
He’s a surgeon who’s dedicated 50+ years to researching cancer.
His message? Cancer isn’t bad genes or random mutations—it’s your immune system failing.
This changes everything you’ve been told about how to fight & prevent cancer: 🧵
1/ Cancer rates are rising alarmingly
• Soon-Shiong sees 13-year-olds with pancreatic cancer
• Colleagues report 8-11-year-olds with colon cancer
• Young adults with aggressive cancers
• Cases showing "turbo-charged" progression
But why is that?
2/ For decades, oncology has operated on the premise:
"Cancer is fundamentally a genetic disease."
Despite billions spent on genetic research, survival rates for aggressive cancers like pancreatic cancer remain low.
Something crucial is missing in our understanding.