🧵NEW: Armed gangs are looting food warehouses across Gaza—and Israeli drones are reportedly targeting the police and volunteers trying to stop them.
Multiple sources, including eyewitnesses and journalists, say the gangs are backed by Israel.
Here’s what’s being reported: 🔽
2/ @TareqAzzom Gaza correspondent for Al Jazeera English, reports:
▪️ “Local gangs, reportedly backed by Israel, are looting what remains of Gaza’s food warehouses.”
▪️ Israeli forces, he says, have struck police officers who were trying to stop the thefts.
3/ One of the clearest firsthand accounts comes from a volunteer at a community kitchen in western Gaza.
He says armed gangs attacked their facility twice in one day.
The second time, they fired live rounds and broke into a food store serving 1,500+ families.
[Instagram story from @madhoun95]
4/ “This wasn’t just theft,” the volunteer wrote. “It was an organized effort to spread fear and dismantle what little safety remains.”
“They are the hands of the Mossad and sedition,” he adds.
He says most community kitchens and food storage facilities in western Gaza have been similarly targeted by looters.
5/ Investigative journalist Mohamed Elzanin has documented three Israeli drone strikes in a single hour on patrols attempting to stop the looting at Al-Thawra and Al-Wahda Streets in Gaza City.
Those targeted, he reports, were community volunteers and local police.
6/ Al Jazeera’s Anas Al-Sharif reports: “Horrifying footage shows Israeli occupation forces targeting civilians and members of local security teams as they attempted to protect their shops from looting and chaos.”
7/ In response, Gaza’s major families are speaking out. The Madhoun family released a formal statement denouncing the looting and calling it part of a broader destabilization strategy. They also called for the formation of a national leadership consisting of heads of municipalities, national institution and popular committees to put an end to these attacks. They warned: “These gangs act in alignment with the goals of the occupation.”
8/ Drop Site contributor @AbubakerAbedW, recently evacuated from Gaza, writes:
▪️ “The Israeli military has assigned gangs to cause chaos and break down public order.”
▪️ He says looting has spread across Gaza. Main targets: warehouses and stores.
9/ Officer Asaad Yahya Al-Kafarna was killed in an Israeli airstrike while leading a police patrol pursuing looters in Gaza City, near the Thai Restaurant. According to his family, he was tasked with confronting gangs accused of collaborating with the Israeli military to raid food and flour storage sites in the Al-Nasr area of northern Gaza.
10/ Together, the pattern appears to be:
▪️Israel’s blockade creates famine
▪️Israeli forces then systematically bombs community kitchens
▪️ Organized gangs try to loot remaining supplies at warehouses and storage sites
▪️ Local efforts to stop the chaos—by police and volunteers—are then bombed by Israel
Israeli forces appear to be systematically engineering the collapse of Gaza’s internal order, and the ability to feed Palestinians.
11/ Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas shared a statement through the state-run WAFA outlet placing the blame on Hamas for the lootings:
“The Presidency expressed its rejection and strong condemnation of the robbery and theft operations carried out by gangs, targeting warehouses of humanitarian aid provided to our people in the Gaza Strip, foremost amongst them the Hamas gangs, stressing that our Palestinian people will not forgive these gangs for their heinous crimes committed in these difficult times they are going through, specifically in the Strip.”
12/ Gaza’s Interior Ministry has condemned the “actions of collaborators” working with Israel amid the 63-day siege and an 18-month genocide.
The Ministry said Israeli forces struck one of its police units shortly after they thwarted a theft attempt—calling the attack an effort to undermine Palestinian unity. It vowed to intensify operations to pursue and punish those working with the occupation.
A resistance source told Al-Araby that Israel is now actively deploying armed collaborators to loot remaining food supplies across Gaza. The source said these theft attempts have sharply increased in recent days and form part of Israel’s “starvation war.”
THREAD: On Monday, the House will vote on H.R. 867—a bill expanding the 2018 Anti-Boycott Act to cover boycotts promoted by the UN or other international governmental bodies.
But under current law, U.S. companies and individuals are already barred from complying with, or even failing to report boycott requests if they fall under boycotts promoted by foreign governments.
Here’s how U.S. law is being enforced to shield apartheid Israel from pressure: 🔽🧵
1. Kuwait Airways (2020)
Fined $700,000 for refusing to sell tickets to Israeli passport holders on its JFK–London route.
That refusal—part of Kuwait’s national policy—was enforced on U.S. soil. Under the 2018 law, foreign state-owned companies operating in the U.S. are prohibited from participating in foreign boycotts of Israel.
2. Forta Corporation (2023)
Fined ~$45,000 after agreeing to a UAE customer’s request to provide written certification that “no labor, capital, parts or raw material of Israeli origin [were] used” in the manufacture of the goods being shipped.
Forta is a U.S. manufacturer of synthetic fiber reinforcement used in roads and concrete. This certification amounted to furnishing prohibited boycott-related information.
It also failed to report the boycott request to the Commerce Department.
The UAE at that time participated in the boycott of Israel, and the request reflected a common boycott clause.
🚨NEWS: The House is set to vote Monday on H.R. 867, the “IGO Anti-Boycott Act,” which would punish Americans with fines of up to $1 million or prison terms up to 20 years for participating in boycotts of Israel or Israeli settlements that are promoted by international governmental organizations (IGOs), such as the UN or EU.
The bill, sponsored by pro-Israel lawmaker Rep. Mike Lawler, expands U.S. anti-boycott law to target voluntary, values-based political action by U.S. citizens. Its aim is to shield Israel from nonviolent international pressure campaigns such as BDS.
Rights groups say the legislation criminalizes constitutionally protected political expression and is part of a broader push to suppress opposition to Israeli genocide, apartheid, and illegal settlement expansion, under the guise of fighting antisemitism.
Here are plausible examples of how H.R. 867 could lead to Americans being penalized or criminalized for entirely voluntary, values-based actions:
1. A small business owner declines to stock settlement-made wine
A grocery store owner in California chooses not to sell wines produced in Israeli settlements in the West Bank, citing international law violations. If this decision aligns with an IGO recommendation—like one from the UN Human Rights Council—that could trigger penalties under H.R. 867.
2. A church follows a faith-based boycott policy
A progressive Christian denomination issues a statement encouraging its congregants to avoid doing business with companies operating in occupied Palestinian territory. A church member who follows that guidance could be seen as participating in an IGO-aligned boycott.
3. A student group urges divestment from settlement-linked companies
A campus group encourages their university to drop contracts with companies that provide services to Israeli settlements, citing recommendations from the UN. Under H.R. 867, participating students could be investigated for promoting a prohibited boycott.
4. An individual cancels a catering order over settlement goods
Someone discovers that a catering company sources its ingredients from Israeli settlements and cancels the order, referencing a UN database of companies operating in occupied territory. That personal decision could be framed as a violation.
5. A journalist publishes a “do not buy” guide
A writer publishes a guide listing companies involved in the occupation and encourages consumers to avoid them, referencing data from the Palestinian government. The act of publishing and advocating such a list could be penalized for promoting a boycott.
6. An investor divests from a company on ethical grounds
An American investor chooses to sell stock in a corporation doing business in Israeli settlements after reading an EU report urging businesses to withdraw. This divestment, if linked to IGO guidance, could be treated as illegal under the bill.
⚡️NEW: Israel Rejects Hamas Offer to Free All Israeli Captives and End Gaza Assault in Exchange for 5-Year Truce
Israeli officials have told local media there is “no chance” the government will accept Hamas’s latest proposal—a five-year ceasefire that would end the war on Gaza, allow for reconstruction, and secure the release of all Israeli captives. Instead, Israel is planning for ways to prolong the assault.
Here are five key things to know from the latest reports today:
1. Israel Rejects 5-Year Truce and Captive Release Deal
➤ Israeli officials told Yedioth Ahronoth and Times of Israel they will not agree to a hudna (truce) that would allow Hamas to “rearm, recover, and continue its war.”
➤ Hamas’s proposal, as confirmed by Drop Site News and Israeli media, offered to release all Israeli captives in Gaza in exchange for ending the war, a full Israeli withdrawal, reconstruction, and humanitarian aid.
➤ Israel refuses any deal that would halt its military campaign without “dismantling Hamas,” demanding disarmament—a red line for Hamas.
2. Netanyahu’s Government Prepares to Expand Gaza Assault
➤ Instead of advancing a deal to bring captives home, Israel’s security cabinet is reportedly convening again this week to discuss expanding military operations in Gaza (Maariv).
➤ This follows a weekend of extensive Israeli terror bombings in Gaza and prolonged siege conditions, with no clear plan for ending the war or securing captives’ release.
REPORT: Biden Officials Admit They Never Pressured Israel for Ceasefire, as Israeli Leaders Boast of Playing Washington
“God did the State of Israel a favor that Biden was the president during this period… We fought [in Gaza] for over a year and the administration never came to us and said, ‘ceasefire now.’ It never did. And that’s not to be taken for granted.”
—Former Israeli ambassador Michael Herzog:
A sweeping Israeli Channel 13 investigation has exposed the Biden administration’s complicity in Israel’s 19-month war on Gaza. Nine top Biden officials acknowledged avoiding real pressure on Israel—even as the death toll surpassed 30,000. Israeli leaders openly bragged they dragged out the war, playing for time until Donald Trump’s return.
Former National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan, Ambassador Tom Nides, and others defended their unwavering support for Israel—even as they admitted enabling a campaign one U.S. aide described as “killing and destroying for the sake of killing and destroying.”
Here’s what the investigation revealed: 🧵⬇️
1. “Killing and Destroying for the Sake of Killing and Destroying”
➤ Ilan Goldenberg, a senior national security aide, described the war’s aimlessness: “If they’re never going to do this, it doesn’t matter what the outcome is, Hamas is still going to control Gaza. You’re just killing and destroying for the sake of killing and destroying. But you’re not building an alternative.”
➤ U.S. officials pushed a post-war plan modeled on the anti-ISIS campaign, proposing that Arab states temporarily secure Gaza—but Netanyahu blocked it, refusing any role for the Palestinian Authority.
➤ Far-right Israeli ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich openly pushed for reoccupying Gaza and rebuilding settlements. Netanyahu refused to advance alternatives, keeping the door open to their demands.
2. “We Fought for Over a Year and the Administration Never Said ‘Ceasefire Now’”
➤ Israeli officials were blunt about the benefits of Biden’s passivity. Former ambassador Michael Herzog declared:
“God did the State of Israel a favor that Biden was the president during this period, because it could have been much worse. We fought [in Gaza] for over a year and the administration never came to us and said, ‘ceasefire now.’ It never did. And that’s not to be taken for granted.”
➤ Biden aides privately admitted Netanyahu was dragging out the war. “He’s undercutting it every step of the way,” said Goldenberg. “All the security people are coming out and saying it.”
➤ He also revealed there were internal discussions in Washington about Biden giving a speech to pressure Israel politically, possibly triggering new elections there—but Biden backed off.
For more than two decades, Hamas has offered Israel long-term truces (hudna) in exchange for ending the occupation. Every offer has been rejected.
Today, Hamas has begun presenting mediators with a comprehensive plan for a five-year truce to end the war in Gaza—offering major concessions.
The resistance movement has not officially released details of its latest ceasefire proposal, but according to Al-Araby Al-Jadeed, which cites Egyptian sources and a senior Hamas official familiar with the negotiations, the plan includes:
➤ Full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, with a short, guaranteed timeline backed by mediators.
➤ Release of all Israeli captives, dead and alive, in exchange for ending the war.
➤ A five-year truce with all reconstruction restrictions lifted, based on Egypt’s Arab League-backed plan to rebuild Gaza over 3-5 years.
➤ Hamas steps down from Gaza’s civil administration, including the police. An interim committee, formed and trained by Egypt (with background checks on personnel), would govern.
➤ Resistance weapons remain, but Hamas offers guarantees: arms won’t be used if Israel adheres to the deal, and no new military infrastructure (including tunnels) will be built near Gaza’s border during the truce.
➤ Aid distribution will be monitored by third parties, including the American security firm that oversaw the January 17 ceasefire, as well as tribal leaders unaffiliated with Hamas to ensure aid reaches civilians and counters Israeli claims of diversion.
Despite major concessions, Hamas’s leadership maintains:
➤ No to disarmament of the resistance.
➤ No to partial deals without full guarantees.
The idea of a hudna is not new, as reported in @jeremyscahill’s latest story on the negotiations. Hamas has suggested such arrangements for decades—and Israel has rejected every offer. Let’s walk through that history. 🔽
2. 1997 | Sheikh Ahmed Yassin’s Offer
Shortly after his release from Israeli prison, Hamas founder Sheikh Ahmed Yassin offered a 10-year truce if Israel withdrew from the territories occupied in 1967, released Palestinian prisoners, and allowed a Palestinian state.
In Egypt’s Al-Ahram, Yassin said:
“Let’s solve this problem now on the basis of the 1967 borders… Let’s leave the bigger issue for future generations.”
3. 1997 | 30-Year Truce Offer
Former Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy later confirmed Yassin had made an even broader offer—a 30-year truce—through Jordanian mediators.
Israel rejected it. Seven years later, Yassin was assassinated.
REPORT | Moroccan Dockworkers and Protesters Disrupt Maersk Shipment of F-35 Parts to Israel
Protesters and dockworkers in Tangier and Casablanca took to the streets and ports on Sunday to resist the docking of Maersk ships suspected of transporting components for F-35 warplanes used in Israeli airstrikes on Gaza. What began as mass demonstrations has now escalated into a direct labor refusal at the Tangier Med Port — a clear stand by Moroccan port workers against Israel’s military supply chain for genocide.
🧵Thread continues below
Video: Protests in Casablanca today
➤ Mass Mobilization in Tangier and Casablanca
In Tangier, an estimated 1,500 demonstrators marched from the city center toward the port, denouncing what they described as Morocco’s complicity in genocide. Protesters chanted “No genocidal weapons in Moroccan waters” and called for a full severing of diplomatic ties with Israel.
In Casablanca, where protesters had already mobilized earlier in the week, demonstrators again attempted to reach the port in an effort to intercept the Maersk Nexoe. Both protests were organized by a coalition of pro-Palestine activists, labor unions, and civil society groups. Security forces blocked access to port infrastructure in both cities.
Video: Protests in Tangier
➤ Dockworker Refusals at Tangier Port
At Tangier Med, 18 out of 20 remote crane controllers on the first shift refused to operate machinery to service the ship believed to be carrying F-35 parts. On the second shift, 27 of 30 workers reportedly joined the refusal. The action followed public calls from the Port Workers’ Union to boycott the Nexoe Maersk and refrain from any involvement in handling military cargo linked to Israel.
While not officially acknowledged by the port or Maersk, internal updates viewed by Drop Site indicate the disruption remains in effect.