Tanya Profile picture
May 4, 2025 11 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Women didn’t just abandon the home.
They were drafted out.

What was offered looked easier than duty, shinier than sacrifice.

This is how the world convinced mothers to leave their children behind,
and how women helped make it happen.🧵 Image
The home wasn’t just where women were.
It was where society was built.
Economies, cultures, and values all flowed from stable households.

Women weren’t “confined” there.
They were the center of it all. Image
But when industrialization and war demanded more labor, something had to give.

And the most underutilized labor pool?
Mothers.
Wives.
Homemakers. Image
It wasn’t about “equality.”
It was about production.
Machines needed workers.
Governments needed taxes.
Corporations needed consumers.

The home was in the way. Image
But no woman naturally wants to hand her baby to a stranger and sit under fluorescent lights all day.

So the propaganda machine was born. Image
Motherhood was rebranded as oppression.
Homemaking as drudgery.
Feminine duty as weakness.
And “freedom” was recast as careerism, sexual liberation, and total independence. Image
They sold it through media.
Hollywood gave us the bored housewife.
Ads gave us the career woman in heels.
Magazines gave us the sexual “liberation.”

The message was loud:
You’re wasting your life at home. Image
And they had to be loud, because the instinct to nurture, protect, and remain with one’s children is so deeply embedded in a woman’s soul,
it takes years of noise to silence it. Image
So they raised girls on a steady diet of ambition, individualism, and fear of missing out.
By the time they became mothers, the guilt of wanting to stay home felt like regression. Image
Now we have an entire generation of women
who’ve been made available to the workforce, but unavailable to their children, husbands, and communities.

And we call this progress. Image
The truth is:
Women weren’t “freed” from the home.
They were extracted from it.

Because powerful systems knew:
If you remove the woman from the hearth, the whole house collapses.

And that’s exactly what they wanted. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tanya

Tanya Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @turnedwife

Jul 18, 2025
The greatest lie of the modern world? That men and women are the same, that they are interchangeable.

Here’s a thread on why they never were, and never will be. Image
Women carry life. Men don’t.
Women are born with every egg they’ll ever have. Men produce sperm daily.
Women bleed, birth, and breastfeed. Men do not.
Not “social constructs” but simple biology. Image
Women are estrogen-dominant, emotional, relational, cyclical.

Men are testosterone-driven, aggressive, linear, stable.

That affects everything: energy, behavior, libido, attachment, and even brain function. Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 4, 2025
“You don’t owe anyone anything.”

One of the most spiritually corrosive lies of modern culture.

A thread on obligation, duty, and why real freedom isn’t found in detachment, but in devotion. 🧵 Image
Modern life is built on the idol of autonomy.

“Set boundaries.”
“Cut off anyone who doesn’t serve you.”
“You don’t owe anyone your time, your energy, your body.”

It sounds progressive, it sounds good, but it’s actually just the blueprint for total isolation. Image
We are born into debt.

You owe your mother for carrying you.
You owe your father for protecting you.
You owe your children your presence.
You owe your spouse your faithfulness.
You owe your neighbor your decency.
You owe your God your life. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 20, 2025
The modern world tells women:
“Have children, just make sure nothing changes.”
Not your work output.
Not your body.
Not your identity.
Not your ambition.

This is not progressive.
This is painfully delusional nonsense.

🧵 Image
There is no greater cognitive dissonance in modern society than its attitude toward motherhood.
We treat childbirth (the most transformative event in human experience) as something that should be squeezed between meetings and bounced back from by Monday. Image
Philosophically, it’s incoherent.
To bring forth a new human being, a soul with an eternal destiny, and expect your ontology, your being to remain intact is anti-reality.

Motherhood isn’t a task. It is an ontological shift. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 19, 2025
Feminism gave women power with no honor code

In nearly every civilization, the possession of power was historically accompanied by a code of conduct. Kings had laws. Warriors had honor.
Power without restraint isn’t liberation it’s simply just corruption.

🧵 Image
Feminism restructured the moral and social architecture of the West by transferring vast cultural, legal, and sexual power to women. But unlike previous power structures, it imposed no corresponding code - no duties, no hierarchy, no internal governance. Image
This is unprecedented. Every previous transfer of power, from monarchs to parliament, from nobility to citizen, was accompanied by debates on responsibility, on the burden of wielding power justly.

Feminism sidestepped this tradition completely. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jun 18, 2025
Darwin’s theory didn’t just challenge Genesis.
It challenged the very meaning of womanhood.
By reducing the human person to a cosmic accident, evolution turned motherhood into biology, femininity into utility, and the soul into myth.

This was the first blow to the sacred. Image
In the Christian vision, woman is not a byproduct of randomness.
She is the last act of God before He rested.
Made not from dust, but from man, a relational creature by nature, not merely by function (Genesis 2:22–23).

Darwin strips this entirely. Image
If evolution is true, then woman is not created with purpose.
She is simply what survived.
Not “helper,” not “beloved,” not “mother of all the living.”
But a vessel of reproduction, selected by a blind and brutal process that favors aggression, not love. Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 17, 2025
Promiscuity promised women power. But it functioned like a pyramid scheme: a few winners at the top, millions of losers at the bottom.

🧵 Image
Like any pyramid scheme, the early adopters appear to thrive.
But this model is not sustainable.
It commodifies sex, flattens intimacy, and turns bonding into transactional leverage. Image
The system depends on mass buy-in.
Women give sexual access in hopes of securing long-term intimacy.
Men are told to “level up” endlessly to deserve basic loyalty.

Both are dehumanized. Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(