PraxBen, but I am tired of ts Profile picture
May 4, 2025 14 tweets 4 min read Read on X
RTSG commies have been slandering and attacking Saint Nicholas II on this point for a few weeks now. Time to show that the Tsar not only “didn’t do anything about” this issue, but he did far more than the Bolsheviks ever did to protect young girls and prostitutes🧵 Image
Contrary to what RTSG claim, late Imperial Russia criminalized the sexual exploitation of minors, often more harshly than modern states. Here's what the laws and records actually say:
In the late 1800s, Russia had a regulated prostitution system. Only women over 16 could register (raised to 18 by 1903). Procuring or trafficking underage girls was explicitly criminal.
The 1909 Criminal Code included Article 524, which outlawed the procurement of girls under 21 for prostitution years before many Western countries passed similar laws. Image
Sex with a girl under 14 was treated as a severe crime: molestation (растление) carried harsher penalties than rape of an adult. Even “seduction” of a 14–20-year-old virgin by a guardian/employer was criminalized.

books.openedition.org/obp/1256
Yes, child prostitution existed. But it was seen as a moral crisis, not something the Tsar and Russian society ignored. Religious and women’s groups like ROZZh exposed abuse, pushed reform, and documented cases to build public support for change.
By 1910, public concern over child prostitution was at a fever pitch. Medical and court records treated it as “the most acute and menacing social problem.”
Nicholas II’s government passed anti-trafficking laws, created women’s protective societies, and supported reforms to raise the age of consent and outlaw procurement. The problem wasn’t legal tolerance, it was urban poverty and war.
Compared to the Bolsheviks, who also saw widespread child prostitution during the civil war and NEP, Nicholas II’s government actually passed stronger anti-exploitation laws and didn’t pretend the issue was “solved.”
A Finnish observer in 1923 reported seeing “dozens of little girls engaged in prostitution in broad daylight” on Moscow and Petrograd. Soviet children’s commissions noted that unsupervised homeless girls placed in work homes had often already “engaged in prostitution”

alphahistory.com/russianrevolut…Image
The Bolsheviks did end up banning prostitution, but it did not go away. Things got much worse for the women who were illegally selling themselves and then getting caught.
Lenin personally ordered deportations and even shootings of prostitutes in 1918 to “prevent hooliganism” among troops by 1919 the government opened a forced-labor camp for women (over 6,500 inmates, 60% suspected prostitutes) in Petrograd. Image
The Bolsheviks actually ABOLISHED age of consent. This led to more and more exploitation of young girls. Image
It was a tough uphill battle, but Saint Nicholas II did what he could. The Bolsheviks on the other hand, murdered and exploited women and young girls en masse. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PraxBen, but I am tired of ts

PraxBen, but I am tired of ts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @benbackupbackup

Apr 16
It’s about time I debunked this. This meme is extremely wrong on almost every point. I am going to address the actual points and then address whether or not China is socialist 🧵
"All land and natural resources in China are owned by the Communist Party of China (with the exception of some farmland; which is owned collectively). Land in China can only be leased, not owned."
This is technically accurate. Under China's Constitution (Article 10) and Property Law, urban land is state-owned, while rural/suburban land is typically owned by collectives.
However, ownership on paper does not mean everything. In Nazi Germany, factories were “private” on paper, while the government controlled all aspects of production. This was something called “de facto socialism”. China has the opposite in many areas. Land is “owned” by the state on paper, but private owners are able to make many free decisions for their own profit. We will get back to this.
"68% of China’s GDP in 2023 was generated by State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). SOEs own 60% of China’s total assets as of 2021."
One source tied to this data notes SOE operating income at ¥85.73 trillion (~68% of GDP), but this confuses revenue (gross sales, which can include intermediates and overlaps) with value-added GDP contribution. Private firms contribute 60% of China’s GDP, and are responsible for 70% of innovation, 80% of urban employment and provide 90% of new jobs. Private wealth is also responsible for 70% of investment and 90% of exports.

en.moj.gov.cn/2025-05/08/c_1…
Read 13 tweets
Nov 21, 2025
I want to address the most common right-wing critique of capitalism. A lot of people say capitalism destroys morality, hollows out our human connections, and pits prosperity against culture. They argue that you can either have a rich society or a virtuous one, but not both.

🧵
This is the deterioration hypothesis: Markets may make us richer, but they also make up morally colder. They ruin relationships and social cohesion overall.
Lauren Southern said: “Capitalism is indifferent to morality… if you are a nation that has lost God, capitalism becomes the devil’s playground.”
Sarah Stock said globalization strips us from meaningful work: “You used to buy your chair from the guy down the street… there’s a lot more meaning in that connection.”
Read 22 tweets
Apr 30, 2025
Weirdo communists love to cite this article as evidence that the Holodomor never happened. Let’s debunk it point-by-point. 🧵
“the Holodomor hoax of 1932-33… was invented by the West in close cooperation with Nazi Germany and pro-Nazi Ukrainian nationalists”
This is sheer propaganda. In reality millions died in the 1932–33 famine, a tragedy now well‑documented by archives. Leading scholars agree Stalin’s requisition orders and blockades caused the famine (Applebaum 2017; Kulchytsky 2018). It was not a Western “invention”. Every credible study finds the famine was real, not a manufactured myth.
“Articles… described the horrific famine… Thomas Walker had never visited the Ukraine… he had never existed”
This falsehood ignores the abundant evidence of real famine survivors and documents. Multiple independent witnesses (not a fictional reporter) described mass starvation. The existence or not of “Walker” does nothing to refute those records. Historians have since confirmed the reality of the famine by digging into Soviet archives and village testimonies (Applebaum 2017; Kulchytsky 2018).
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(