Mike Lee Profile picture
May 5 16 tweets 5 min read Read on X
1/ The REINS Act is a potential game-changer for restoring constitutional balance

It would prevent major regulations (those imposing compliance costs of at least $100M) from taking effect without being passed by Congress—not just rubber stamped by unelected bureaucrats! Image
Image
2/ Under the Constitution, only the people’s elected lawmakers are authorized to make federal law

Congress & the Supreme Court have neglected that requirement for decades

The REINS Act would fix this problem, which costs Americans trillions of dollars a year
3/ Essentially everything you buy becomes more expensive as businesses struggle to comply with the tens of thousands of pages of new federal regulations issued annually
4/ The Federal Register from last year alone contains about 100,000 pages and imposes an estimated $1.5 trillion in *new* regulatory compliance costs—on top of the trillions of dollars in compliance costs already imposed by regulations issued prior to 2024!
5/ For too long, federal agencies have churned out “rules” (laws by another name, but written by bureaucrats instead of elected lawmakers)

According to one source, the federal rules now in effect contain 98.68 million words of red tape—crushing small businesses, stifling innovation, and harming consumers in countless ways

The REINS Act would restrain runaway bureaucracy, making agencies answer to Congress and (more importantly) the American people
6/ The 2025 budget reconciliation package may be our best shot to pass the REINS Act

Reconciliation bypasses the 60-vote “cloture” requirement in the Senate

If we can make REINS work through reconciliation, we could finally pass this bill, which the House has passed four times
7/ Critics say REINS is “radical”

I say, thank heaven for that!

It’s radical to let unelected officials write laws with zero accountability

It’s common sense to require Congress to pass major rules

Let’s flip the script on Washington’s power grab Image
8/ The REINS Act isn’t just about cutting red tape—it’s about speeding up progress

Unchecked regulations delay critical projects, from infrastructure to energy

By putting Congress in charge, we can move faster and smarter—without needless delays imposed by unelected bureaucrats
9/ We’ve spent *months* strategizing on how to fit REINS into reconciliation’s budget rules

It’s tailored to focus on rules that it impacts mandatory outlays or revenues—ensuring it passes muster with the Senate parliamentarian

This is strategic, deliberate, and ready to go
10/ Some in Congress might hesitate, but they shouldn’t

The REINS Act isn’t partisan—it’s pro-accountability

It ensures *every* major regulation, no matter the administration, faces scrutiny

This would protect Americans from overreach—during this admin and in the future!
11/ The stakes are high: without REINS, agencies will keep imposing “invisible taxes” through regulations—with costs hitting families & businesses hard

With REINS, those regs would face a vote

And then lawmakers would be required to face voters, as the Constitution requires
12/ The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee has criticized it, insisting that the REINS Act “would be a war on regulations,” and that “[t]o take that authority away from the executive branch would be a serious mistake”

His first argument—that REINS amounts to a “war on regulations” made by bureaucrats who can’t be fired by the American people through elections—is quite an endorsement!

As to his second point, the “serious mistake” was made decades ago when Congress began authorizing unelected bureaucrats to make federal law, contrary to the command of the Constitution

That mistake continues to this day and has harmed the American people in ways most of us can’t even imagine

The good news is that we can turn this mess around with the REINS ActImage
13/ The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee also criticized it, arguing that REINS would help Congress “hide the most destructive deregulatory votes among dozens of others, completely burying it in darkness”

What?

He’s got it exactly backwards

Nothing says “we’re burying it in darkness” quite like letting unelected bureaucrats subject Americans to tens of thousands of pages of new federal law every year *without* requiring a vote in Congress!Image
14/ We’re not just talking here—we’re building a broad coalition to make REINS law, as Representative @Kat_Cammack can attest

That’s where you come in

To make this happen, we need YOU to tell your senators: support REINS in reconciliation!
15/ The REINS Act is about one thing: giving power back to the people

Pass it in 2025, and we’ll restore the Constitution’s promise—with federal laws being made by those you elect, not by bureaucrats you’ll never meet

Call your senator today you want the REINS Act in the reconciliation package

Let’s do this! 🇺🇸
@Kat_Cammack 16/ Here’s the link to the article:


Please share if you agree that we need to pass the REINS Act!politico.com/news/2025/05/0…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mike Lee

Mike Lee Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BasedMikeLee

Apr 8
President Trump:

Making clean coal great again! Image
“My predecessor put America last. I’m putting America first.”
“The Paris Climate Accord was a bad deal—it was a scam to take money away from the United States and hurt us.”
Read 7 tweets
Mar 31
🧵 1. Americans are drowning in red tape—100,000 pages of new federal rules in 2024 alone, all from unelected bureaucrats

The REINS Act would stop this by requiring Congress to vote on & pass “major rules” *before* they may take effect

We must take back our freedom in 2025! Image
2. What is the REINS Act?

It’s simple: any regulation with a $100M+ economic impact must get a thumbs-up from Congress and the President before it can take effect

No more lawmaking by faceless agencies and unelected bureaucrats—power returns to the people’s elected lawmakers
3. Why now? The administrative state grows unchecked—$1.9T in costs from Biden-era rules alone

Innovation stalls, businesses suffer, and families pay the price

The REINS Act reins it in, and 2025 is our shot with a new Congress and President Trump in office—and of course @DOGE
Read 10 tweets
Feb 24
17. Republicans in Congress therefore need to take a stand—holding hostage something Democrats care about by attaching the REINS Act to that thing Image
18. To that end, Republicans should attach the REINS Act to any bill to increase the debt ceiling, forcing true compromise in an area where it’s badly needed—here, restoring separation of powers through the REINS Act Image
19. The REINS Act would force a restoration of the separation of powers mandated by the Constitution, by returning the lawmaking power to the legislative branch Image
Read 9 tweets
Feb 24
🧵 1. There was a time when the federal government didn’t play such an outsized role in our daily lives

We had a limited-purpose government in place at the national level

That began to change when, on April 12, 1937, the Supreme Court lawlessly “amended” the Constitution Image
2. On April 12, 1937, the Supreme Court dramatically expanded federal authority under the (previously narrow) Commerce Clause—severely undermining federalism—in response to FDR’s extortionate threat to pack the Supreme Court Image
3. In NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co., the Supreme Court—for the first time in history, and contrary to the text and original understanding of the Constitution—held that Congress’s power to regulate interstate commerce encompasses purely local, intrastate, economic activity so long as it has a sufficient *effect* on commerce between the statesImage
Read 25 tweets
Feb 21
🧵 1. The Fourth Turning in 2025: Trump’s Vision as America’s Next Great Shift

In 1997, historians William Strauss and Neil Howe published *The Fourth Turning*, a provocative work arguing that history unfolds in cycles—roughly 80-to-100-year “saecula”—each divided into four generational “turnings”: High, Awakening, Unraveling, and Crisis. These phases repeat in a predictable rhythm, shaped by generational archetypes and societal moods.

The Fourth Turning, the final stage, is a winter of upheaval during which older institutions collapse and a new order rises. In 2025, with Donald Trump newly re-elected and backed by a Republican-controlled Congress, the United States may be entering this transformative phase. 

If we trace prior turnings to the American Revolution (1776), the Civil War (1861), and the constitutional culmination point of the New Deal Era (1937), Trump’s agenda—particularly his push to restore federalism and separation of powers—could catalyze the next seismic shift in American history.Image
2. The Theory of the Fourth Turning

Strauss and Howe liken a saeculum to the seasons: a High is a spring of unity and growth (post-World War II America), an Awakening is a summer of individualism and rebellion (the 1960s counterculture), an Unraveling is an autumn of cynicism and decay (the 1980s–2000s), and a Crisis is a winter of destruction and renewal. America’s past Crises—the Revolution, Civil War, and Depression-to-WWII era—were existential challenges that reshaped the nation over decades. The Revolution birthed a republic, the Civil War redefined it, and the New Deal era forged the modern federal regulatory system.

The last turn-inducing Crisis arguably began with the 1929 stock market crash, deepened through the Great Depression, reached its culmination point in 1937 when the Supreme Court loosened key constitutional restraints to unlock FDR’s New Deal ambitions,and evolved with the onset of World War II, resolving in 1945 with victory and the American Century’s dawn—a new High. 

Counting forward, some have argued that the next (current) Crisis began to emerge between 2005 and 2015, a timeline aligning with the 2008 financial collapse, rising polarization, and global instability. Now, in 2025, we’re entrenched in this winter phase, grappling with economic fragility, cultural divides, and a strained world order. Could Trump’s presidency be its fulcrum?Image
3. Trump’s 2025 Agenda as a Fourth Turning Catalyst

Trump’s return to the White House in 2025 carries a mandate for bold change. His campaign vowed to dismantle the “Deep State” (entrenched bureaucratic power), reassert American sovereignty, and reverse decades of globalization. Policies targeting border security, federal deregulation, and reduced reliance on international alliances signal a break from the post-World War II consensus—the order built during the last turning’s resolution. If Strauss and Howe are correct, a Crisis demands a reckoning with failing institutions, and Trump’s vision fits that mold.

A key pillar of his agenda could (and ideally should) directly influence this Fourth Turning: restoring the Constitution’s core “structural” protections, federalism and separation of powers, starting with the passage of the REINS Act. This legislation, long championed by conservatives, would require congressional approval for major federal regulations, curbing unelected agencies’ overreach and rebalancing power between the three branches of the federal government and the states. Such a move would echo the constitutional focus of past turnings, dismantling the centralized bureaucracy that has grown since 1937 and setting the stage for a renewed American framework.

Historical parallels abound. In 1776, the Revolution severed colonial ties to Britain, birthing a nation through war and the Constitution. In 1861, the Civil War erupted over slavery, tearing the country apart before Lincoln’s leadership restored it. By 1929, the Great Depression spurred desperate Americans to accept FDR’s New Deal, vastly expanding federal authority starting in 1937. 

Each Crisis destroyed the old order—monarchy, slavery, and strict constitutional limits—and forced a new paradigm. Trump’s 2025 vision, bolstered by measures like the REINS Act, could be this era’s wrecking ball, targeting a sclerotic, elitist order that Americans increasingly resent.Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 30
🧵1. Senator Schiff just demanded that Senator Grassley, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, should immediately join Democrats in asking for the release of Kash Patel’s grand jury testimony transcripts
2. Chairman Grassley declined, correctly noting that this isn’t something we ordinarily do, and that we’d need to have a good reason to attempt
3. Schiff seemed to think this was such an obvious move that no one should question the wisdom behind it—and that Grassley should immediately agree to it without giving it another thought or conferring with the Committee
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(