The "A Minecraft Movie" movie is the most reactionary movie I've ever seen and the future zoomer world order is bright and wonderful
I would have called it "The humiliation of the coward Jack Black and the end of irony"
🧵
The “A Minecraft Movie” movie is a good movie. It is very different from what was advertised. The exact thing you think it’s going to be when you watch the trailer, is what it is, but it is also something more than that.
The movie speaks a strange language, that is both film language, internet language, and something genuine, in a way that is very hard to disentangle and take apart. It’s ironic about being a movie, being a certain kind of movie.
It’s ironic about being a video game movie, and it’s especially ironic about being “a Minecraft movie”. But despite that it is not insincere. underneath the obtuse mix of film-language and irony, there is a surprisingly coherent and honest voice of sincerity.
The film opens with Jack Black doing an ironic movie voice-over, explaining how he became the “Steve” character. It is drenched in irony, exactly as you expect it would:
he references the internet meme of “children yearn for the mines”, he does his Jack Black thing of screamtalking and STRESSing random sylLABles while making a goofy face. His life story is, he was a loser and unhappy, and then he went to minecraft world and had fun.
It goes on a little too long to set up the basic film(tm) plotline for later in the movie, with a evil witch and a mcguffin and some movie stuff to do later.
But after this introduction, when he sends the mcguffin to earth to be found by the main character, the movie’s language changes. It is no longer gen x nihilism, or millennial irony after Jack Black is put in prison in hell, and we change protagonist to Young Zoomer Henry.
The reason the movie resonates with the Zoomers is because it reflects their own life experience back at them, and they pick up on that in a subconscious way even if they can’t articulate it.
The real plot of the movie is that a boy is SUCKED against his will into a RECTANGULAR PORTAL into a world that is HYPER STIMULATING and OVERSATURATED, where the people he meet tells him it is a beautiful world of “creativity”,
but it’s actually a really simplistic world of base Id expression and Id satisfaction,
Fuck wrong picture I mean
No sorry my bad I mean
And the person telling him all this, singing (literally) the praises of “creativity”, spinning a yarn about how in the real world, creativity is punished and you are bullied for being “creative”,
but in the magical Minecraft alternative dimension world, you can just <cum forever> I mean express yourself by building houses. Don’t think too hard about how every time you “put down a block” is make a pleasant “plop” sound and it’s clearly stimulating,
as every character is expressing extreme joy and the *act* of putting down each block. Not the “creative” part of planning out a project or solving a project, but the mere mechanical task of clicking the button. Anyways the guy telling you all that looks like this:
A fat, slovenly, unwashed, annoying manchild, who is exactly the opposite of what he claims to worship. Jack Blacks character is pure Id expression, because that’s the only thing Jack Black does. He’s childish and base and vulgar, and takes childish pleasure in base things.
The good news is, the movie is in on the joke. The spectacular news is, I don’t think Jack Black is. Either he isnt, or he is a much better actor than I give him credit for,
because the whole thing relies on him being himself, and the movie is, on both a literal reading level, and on a meta-interactive-internet level, making fun of Jack Black, both the role Steve and the Actor Jack.
In many other movies like this, this would have been a director with contempt for his audience, but that is not at all what A Minecraft movie does. This is just contempt for Jack Black, and the audience is welcomed to take part in it.
On a literal plot level, the antagonist of the movie is some witch pig lady. But on an emotional level, Steve is a villain, the shadow of the protagonist of the movie.
The main character Henry is a genuinely creative and smart kid. This is illustrated by him being able to draw well, and being a literal math genius, who can engineer a functioning rocket from scratch.
Jack Black is a “Creative”, which is illustrated by him making silly faces and yelling random nonsense
(This scene literally happens in the movie. Jack black has made a Creative People Chicken Oven, where he roasts chickens with lava)
When Henry and the other cast of characters are stuck in minecraft world, they are not actually aided by Steve. They are told that they are, he tells them they are, but at no point in the movie does he ever really help them out of a situation he didnt cause -
in fact the whole reason they are stuck in there is Steve’s fault in the first place, for sending the McGuffin to earth. The only act of real creative thinking, in the plot, is near the end when Henry uses a gun he made to utilize a teleportation spell, to shoot it to where they need to go.
The formal villain of the movie is Malgosha, an evil Witch, who’s backstory is that she was ridiculed by her pig society for wanting to be an expressionist dancer, and so she swore to destroy all “creativity”
(that’s the word they use in the movie, over and over), forever, while committing to her culture’s goal of maximizing gold mining. She wants to invade minecraft world to mine their gold and destroy all creativity.
But in this, she is more of a shadow of Steve than of Henry. Henry is never seriously confronted with giving up on his abilities. But Steve’s “creativity” is exactly the same as Malgosha: autistic grinding of some arbitrary resource.
And despite her being “the evil witch who forswore Creativity”, she is a magical witch, who has grand plans and schemes, and she even created a weird giant Frankenstein’s monster pig that can shoot laser beams.
Seems pretty creative to me! But it is not, of course, “Creative”. Steve, the poster child of “CREATIVITY”, only wears blue shirts - the movie makes multiple jokes hammering this down.
The heroes go on a journey and hunt for the mcguffin, they learn a thing or two about friendship along the way, and they have a big CGI fight between two armies at the end (because that’s what you do in movies now), and then the interesting stuff can happen:
As the portal is repaired and they can go back to IRL, there is not a second of doubt in Henry about whether to go home. When Steve asks him and says, in his jack black irony nihilism voice,
“Don’t you want to stay in my magical world with be and Be Creative without Getting Bullied”, Henry is more or less just going “wtf no u pussy. I’m not a fucking coward. what are you talking about”.
And Steve is shamed into coming with them, and make something of himself, in the real world. This then all happens as a funny “movie montage”, in the movie language thing.
But this is what I mean about it being a strange mix of languages. It uses irony, but only because “thats what films do”, and it speaks film-language, sincerely.
The story ultimately never portrays “the minecraft world” as a good place, but a place of indulgence, of Id expression and satisfaction. Steve is a perverted gross imp, who has lived for 20 years as a NEET indulging himself in base dopamine grinding.
He is a gooner. And the film itself utterly rejects him: there is no ambiguity here, the minecraft world is bad, and the real world is what matters. “being creative” in minecraft is shallow and hollow, and is a bad outlet for your talents.
The hypersaturated world of hyperreality, of the media-mediated reality that was forced on the zoomers, as their parents plopped a phone or ipad on them as children, is a shallow and hollow mimicry of the real world,
and exposing children to “minecraft” at age 9 is not going to make them more “creative”, it is just going to make them into autistic gooners. It is not really a minecraft movie.
It is a movie about the zoomer life experience, and a genuine and open confrontation with prior generations. The minecraft branding is arbitrary. The emotional core of the movie, and there truly is a genuine human emotional core, is a genuine inter-generational dialogue.
And I say, the reason the zoomers like it, is not some ironic doubly irony joke where they pretend to like a bad movie - that is just what it looks like to millenials, because “that’s what millennials do”.
The reason they like it is because they ressonate with a story about being raped by a magical portal that sends you to a fake world you have to escape from.
And that is extremely genuine and real, and the movie totally succeeds in expressing something, that possibly haven’t been captured in art before, with the novelty of our technological-historical situation.
The ultimate message of “A Minecraft Movie” is: “The people who made these phones and screens and made sure you had one in your hands at age 6, all have names and addresses.“
And the way it portrays this message is by showing over and over again that Jack Black, as a stand in for gen X nihilism and millennial irony, is totally oblivious, that he doesn’t “get it”, that he is a clown who is not in on the joke.
You could say a million more things about the movie, I am only scratching the surface and talking about my immediate takeaway, the overall thematic coherence of the whole thing, but there is a million things you could dig further into.
It’s funny, engaging, and genuine. And Jack Black is not in on the joke. That’s what makes it work and that’s the point,
and as the credits rolled in the theater, two zoomers who were leaving turned around and waved and smiled and yelled something to me, and I had no idea what they were saying, and I think that’s beautiful.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Literacy causes neuroticism. Literate society is neurotic. Pre-literate societies awe immediate and pragmatic. In the individual as well as on a group level, learning to read fundamentally changes how people think. This is a mechanical process.
We are not talking about "reading makes you smarter because you can read Plato". The act of reading, the process of it, causes a mental disconnect from the immediate world of Pre-literate society.
In our private experience of reading, we experience it as an "opening up" of the world. Aha! Now I truly see, now I see this perspective I didn't before and add it to my own, and the convert of perspectives provide an experience of "depth".
When changing your life, it's better to say "what am I doing different today, right now", and not "well I commit to doing this tomorrow and this on Tuesday and this on Wednesday" and so on. Plans are also good as long as you remember that plans are not pre-emptive choices, they are planning to make a choice. You are not planning on doing x y and z next week, you are planning on choosing to. And when the day comes choosing will feel just as difficult or easy as this moment, planning to choose will not make it any easier. On the day you still have to say: "here's what I am doing different today, right now"
It is better to pray and hope about the future
I want to change some things in my schedule, but it's 8am and I'm going to work and there is nothing to optimise here. Nothing to choose
I watched "The Wedding Singer " featuring Adam Sandler the other day.
At the end of the movie, Adam Sandler is going to try to stop the wedding of the girl he likes because her fiance is a bad man who cheats on her.
The way he does this is not, as I was expecting, by using his wedding singer powers to prove he is the better man somehow, or even by "just telling her the boyfriend is cheating on her".
Instead, he boards the same plane by accident that the love interest and evil fiancee are on, in his attempt to meet them in Vegas.
The historical question is, is communism a historical specific infection, that is spread top down by a clique that survived the last purge, a virus that survives and evolves into strains that mutate into strains immune to penicillin, deadlier and stronger, OR, is it an emergent dysfunction that appears organically under specific conditions, and spreads bottom up. Was woke invented by Obama or by Tumblr.
This is the fundamental divide between serious thinkers. The first dedicate themselves to an obsessive search for the initial contact and inflection point, and writing a specific history about it. The latter knows what the fuck is up
It really does all come down to evolution vs intelligent design
Why is the assumption that "if" porn is bad, and women are right about it, that you have to do what women say? that doesnt follow at all. is it a good idea to do something bad, just to spite women? what if women are right about it, even if they are right for the wrong reasons? should we all defend pornography use because gender relations is a zero sum struggle, and every time women win men lose and wise versa?
You lost the war you are fighting before this happened, because you see it as a power struggle between camps and not as a struggle towards the truth. being a voyeur is not "any semblance of normal male sexuality" and pornograpy is population control, and worrying about whether the girl camp is going to use this fact against you is betraying consern with low base things. why in the world does that matter. why do the woman have authority over you to belittle you over it? if it is so normal, then why does the cudgel work?
whether porn is "normal" or "normalized" or "illegal" or widespread, or not, or either, or all of them - no option or combination of options will free you from the suspicion and distrust. you can chain every woman to a radiator and it will not help the fundamental problem
It's not war, it's politics. When you compromise with the opposition out of largesse what you get is is not reconsiliation, it's corruption and a uni party and an embedded beurocracy deep state
Being nice and merciful to the people who were caught with their pants down is not the same as being merciful to a people who lived through hell and the end of the world and the literal physical collapse of their society
A culture war is not actually a war. They should have called it culture politics to avoid this confusion