In the trade 'deal' with China, the US got nothing.
We're mostly back to where we were before the global trade war started—before Donald Trump started the global trade war.
The Chinese conceded nothing.
Indeed, from the outside, China won this round.
—>
2/ An economist from Hong Kong explains:
'From China’s perspective, the outcome of this meeting is a success, as China took a tough stance on the US threat of high tariffs & eventually managed to get the tariffs down significantly without making concessions.'
The chaos…
—>
3/ …The chaos for American business these last 5 weeks has been incredibly costly—financially, psychologically, in terms of planning, morale, a sense of predictability about the future.
And it has been costly in China as well.
Millions of dollars in wasted…
—>
4/ What has been the point of this effort—this exercise in bluster & muscle flexing—to justify that expenditure of money, talent, simple worry & anxiety?
Just a reminder that Trump—personally—flourishes in the chaos.
It has been his way of doing business for decades.
—>
5/ In the world he has done business in—real estate deals, buying & selling land, golf courses, buildings—this blustering, these tantrums, are part of the culture.
At least for some people.
—>
6/ The chaos Trump revels in creating has no significant impact in the world of real estate deals, because there are no supply chains or long-range planning getting jerked around.
It's just how long I have to make the payments versus handing them off to you.
—>
7/ It seems like another blindspot for Donald Trump.
This is *not* the way business does business — except, sometimes, in his world. It's inefficient, damaging, corrodes relationships of trust on which you have to rely.
None of that matters in one-off real estate deals.
—>
8/ But Trump seems to presume that his business, and the way he does business, is the way all business works.
He completely remade the business of every manufacturer and importer in the US, and four weeks later, he remade it again.
Total chaos. Without any benefit.
—>
9/ Without any benefit—to this point.
Is it possible that in negotiations to come, there will be some kind of concessions from China, involving increased purchases of US goods to reduce the trade deficit that so obsesses Trump?
Maybe. Sure.
—>
10/ But if those 'concessions' or balancing of the trade scales was the point in the 1st place, why did we need to do this 1st?
Why did we need to completely upend the business of the largest automaker in the US, and the smallest toy maker?
—>
11/ Couldn't we have gotten those concessions without the tumult by simply negotiating with China on those issues upfront?
Or even — since this is Trump's style — negotiating on those issues, with the threat of tariffs?
—>
12/ It's just worth noticing — amid today's relief & the stock market surge — that this tumult has had no effect on Donald Trump himself personally; has turned the lives of millions of Americans & Chinese upside down for weeks; and has done that to serve to apparent purpose.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You know how sometimes, you follow the weather & you know the blizzard is coming tomorrow morning, but today it's 39º & crystalline sunshine, & you can't quite believe the blizzard's coming?
But you can look at the radar and, yup, it's coming.
That's where we are now.
—>
2/ We know that in the next month, almost nothing is coming by ship to US from China & Chinese factories.
Ships full of merchandise, not coming.
The Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach has said cargo for the next couple weeks is down 36%.
Fascinating element of Harvard's refusal to buckle to the Trump Administration today.
Who are Harvard's lawyers in this matter?
#1 is Robert K. Hur.
Sound familiar? Trump named him US Attorney for Maryland.
—>
2/ Then Robert Hur was the special counsel who investigated Pres. Biden's mishandling of classified documents. Hur as the one who said Biden was 'an elderly man with a poor memory.' And declined to charge Biden.
That's Harvard lawyer #1.
—>
3/ Harvard lawyer #2 is William A. Burck.
Currently a member of the Board of Directors of Fox Corp., the owner of FoxNews.
Burck served as special counsel to the Republican House task force that investigated the attempted assassination of Pres. Trump.
Could Trump's tariffs spark a US factory & manufacturing renaissance?
Let's say they do.
Here's the problem, even if we double the number of factories the US has now. Even if we—somehow—start making microwave ovens and pleated-front chinos and pillow cases in the US again.
—>
2/ There won't be many jobs.
Factory automation for routine, repetitive manufacturing is very far along.
It's so widespread that there's a phrase in the manufacturing world:
'Lights-out factories.'
…Factories with so few people, they keep the lights off.
—>
3/ Machines don't need lights. So many big companies—including consumer products companies like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Foxconn—run factories with just a scattering of staff who monitor the machines.
Like in a quiet office, the lights only come on when a person walks in.
Here's the thing that might happen with Trump's tariffs.
It's not 1893. It's not 1933.
We—the United States—have spent 50 years creating a web of global trade, an interwoven global economy.
Now, Trump is using garden shears to cut the US out of that network.
—>
2/ We've been the indispensable trade partner—the US is 26% of global GDP, and a great place to sell your stuff. We have well-off consumers with plenty of disposable income.
But if Trump is unbending, the world could simply comply—and trade among themselves.
—>
3/ We are 26% of the global market. But that means 74% of the global market is out there without us.
Including all of the EU, whose unified economy is almost the size of the US, with similar consumers. And the Chinese economy.