Eric Schmidt is sounding the alarm: AI data centers will overload the U.S. power grid. But this isn’t a national crisis. It’s a turf war. The grid isn’t public. It’s privately owned. Schmidt just isn’t rich enough to control it. (1/18)
No level of U.S. government controls the energy infrastructure. It’s been deregulated, fragmented, and sold. Energy is an asset class. The grid is a portfolio. (2/18)
The 1990s were the inflection point. Deregulation was sold as freedom. What it enabled was chaos, market manipulation, and monopolies disguised as competition. (3/18)
Enron wasn’t an accident. It was the business model. California’s blackouts in 2000 weren’t mismanagement. They were profit. (4/18)
Fast forward to 2025. AI needs stable, scalable power. The U.S. grid is aging, patchy, and owned by private monopolies. (5/18)
Microsoft is trying to revive Three Mile Island. Amazon buys solar farms to bypass utilities. Meta wants its own nuclear juice. These are tech empires building shadow grids. (6/18)
Schmidt helped build the digital empire. But he forgot to buy the land. Now he’s locked out while younger barons seize reactors. (7/18)
There is no U.S. national grid. There are three semi-isolated islands and over 3,000 utilities. Many are controlled by private equity or pension funds. (8/18)
PG&E in California has killed people, burned forests, declared bankruptcy, and still pays dividends. That’s the American way. (9/18)
This isn’t dysfunction. It’s doctrine. The market replaced the state. Planning became speculation. Infrastructure became a security. (10/18)
BlackRock doesn’t care if the lights stay on. It cares about yield. The grid isn’t built for resilience. It’s built for returns. (11/18)
Now AI shows up and demands gigawatts. But America’s grid isn’t built for scale. It’s built for auctions. (12/18)
Schmidt isn’t warning us. He’s panicking. He doesn’t own the substations or the uranium. The new tech barons do. (13/18)
The future belongs to whoever controls the switch. Not the app. Not the algorithm. The switch. (14/18)
And the switch is owned by firms with no interest in national destiny. Just quarterly performance. (15/18)
The Department of Energy can’t compel PG&E. FERC mostly approves mergers. America has no strategy. Just regulators wearing ankle monitors. (16/18)
Meanwhile, China builds national grids, co-locates AI clusters with hydropower, and plans by the decade. That’s for Episode 2. (17/18)
America didn’t lose control of its grid. It sold it. Schmidt isn’t warning us. He’s asking to be let back into the control room. (18/18)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We often hear Indians say “China learned everything from us.” But history isn’t a one-way street. Let’s talk about what India actually learned from China, from tech and war to Buddhism and bureaucracy. Buckle up. (2/12)
Paper & Printing:
India wrote on palm leaves until Buddhist monks brought Chinese paper tech by the 7th century. Mass duplication of texts? A Chinese invention. India learned how to print, not just chant. (3/12)
Statement of Record:
What follows is a documented comparison between Neoliberal Capitalism and China’s Market Economy with Socialist Characteristics, not based on ideology, but on lived material outcomes. A thread for the record.
Poverty is not a bug of neoliberal capitalism. It’s a feature. Meanwhile, China’s market economy with socialist characteristics has produced the world’s most asset-rich middle class. A thread. (1/19)
In the U.S., the “land of opportunity,” 58% of citizens live paycheck to paycheck. Even among those earning over $100K, nearly 30% still struggle to make ends meet. This is not prosperity, it’s quiet desperation. (2/19)
The survival of Bretton Woods was never about stability or trust. It was about force. Enforced by gunboats, coups, and the ritual executions of any leader daring to challenge the dollar’s primacy. But the real destroyers of the system were not foreign. They were American. (1/14)
Qaddafi proposed a gold-backed dinar to unite Africa. Within months, NATO turned Libya into rubble and broadcast his sodomy like a trophy. Saddam switched to euros for oil, he was found swinging by his neck after a US occupation. This was the true dollar security model. (2/14)
India and China got along for 2,000 years. So who taught them to hate each other?
The answer explains everything about the new Cold War.
India is in a tough spot. The global chessboard is shifting, and New Delhi has to play like a grandmaster, not a provincial bureaucrat. (1/13)
The U.S. still dominates India’s information space, digital infrastructure, and financial systems. But that grip is getting shaky. The world is moving fast. (2/13)
Trump's “deal” with China is being sold as a win. In truth, it’s a surrender draped in swagger. A self-inflicted wound repackaged as statesmanship. Let’s unpack the theater behind this so-called triumph.
Trump's trade "deal" with China is being hailed as a major win. In reality? It’s a strategic retreat dressed up as a triumph. Here’s how they’re selling a self-inflicted wound as a masterstroke. (1/11)
First, the basics: Trump jacked up tariffs to 145% on Chinese imports. China retaliated. American companies screamed. Now Trump slashes tariffs to 30% and calls it a deal. That’s not a win, that’s undoing your own mess. (2/11)
Another day, another smug comment about China’s maglev being “not worth it” because of development costs or population trends. Western decline is now measured by how
little it dares to imagine. Time for a rebuttal.
China’s vacuum maglev isn’t just about speed. It’s about supremacy. Calling it too expensive or pointless due to population decline is the kind of lazy take that gets you left behind in the next industrial era. (1/9)
Every transformative tech looks “not worth it” at first. The interstate highway system, the internet, and spaceflight were all massive money sinks before they reshaped the world. China isn’t wasting money. It’s building the future. (2/9)