William Huo Profile picture
May 12 19 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The Grid and the Mandate, Episode 1: The Empire That Sold the Switch. 🧵

m.economictimes.com/magazines/pana…
Eric Schmidt is sounding the alarm: AI data centers will overload the U.S. power grid. But this isn’t a national crisis. It’s a turf war. The grid isn’t public. It’s privately owned. Schmidt just isn’t rich enough to control it. (1/18)
No level of U.S. government controls the energy infrastructure. It’s been deregulated, fragmented, and sold. Energy is an asset class. The grid is a portfolio. (2/18)
The 1990s were the inflection point. Deregulation was sold as freedom. What it enabled was chaos, market manipulation, and monopolies disguised as competition. (3/18)
Enron wasn’t an accident. It was the business model. California’s blackouts in 2000 weren’t mismanagement. They were profit. (4/18)
Fast forward to 2025. AI needs stable, scalable power. The U.S. grid is aging, patchy, and owned by private monopolies. (5/18)
Microsoft is trying to revive Three Mile Island. Amazon buys solar farms to bypass utilities. Meta wants its own nuclear juice. These are tech empires building shadow grids. (6/18)
Schmidt helped build the digital empire. But he forgot to buy the land. Now he’s locked out while younger barons seize reactors. (7/18)
There is no U.S. national grid. There are three semi-isolated islands and over 3,000 utilities. Many are controlled by private equity or pension funds. (8/18)
PG&E in California has killed people, burned forests, declared bankruptcy, and still pays dividends. That’s the American way. (9/18)
This isn’t dysfunction. It’s doctrine. The market replaced the state. Planning became speculation. Infrastructure became a security. (10/18)
BlackRock doesn’t care if the lights stay on. It cares about yield. The grid isn’t built for resilience. It’s built for returns. (11/18)
Now AI shows up and demands gigawatts. But America’s grid isn’t built for scale. It’s built for auctions. (12/18)
Schmidt isn’t warning us. He’s panicking. He doesn’t own the substations or the uranium. The new tech barons do. (13/18)
The future belongs to whoever controls the switch. Not the app. Not the algorithm. The switch. (14/18)
And the switch is owned by firms with no interest in national destiny. Just quarterly performance. (15/18)
The Department of Energy can’t compel PG&E. FERC mostly approves mergers. America has no strategy. Just regulators wearing ankle monitors. (16/18)
Meanwhile, China builds national grids, co-locates AI clusters with hydropower, and plans by the decade. That’s for Episode 2. (17/18)
America didn’t lose control of its grid. It sold it. Schmidt isn’t warning us. He’s asking to be let back into the control room. (18/18)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with William Huo

William Huo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wmhuo168

May 14
"What Did India Learn From China?" A Thread to Deflate the Ego (1/12)

We often hear Indians say “China learned everything from us.” But history isn’t a one-way street. Let’s talk about what India actually learned from China, from tech and war to Buddhism and bureaucracy. Buckle up. (2/12)
Paper & Printing:
India wrote on palm leaves until Buddhist monks brought Chinese paper tech by the 7th century. Mass duplication of texts? A Chinese invention. India learned how to print, not just chant. (3/12)
Read 12 tweets
May 14
Statement of Record:
What follows is a documented comparison between Neoliberal Capitalism and China’s Market Economy with Socialist Characteristics, not based on ideology, but on lived material outcomes. A thread for the record.

Poverty is not a bug of neoliberal capitalism. It’s a feature. Meanwhile, China’s market economy with socialist characteristics has produced the world’s most asset-rich middle class. A thread. (1/19)
In the U.S., the “land of opportunity,” 58% of citizens live paycheck to paycheck. Even among those earning over $100K, nearly 30% still struggle to make ends meet. This is not prosperity, it’s quiet desperation. (2/19)
Read 20 tweets
May 13
"The Succubus of Bretton Woods: How Neoliberal Oligarchs Devoured the Empire"

watcher.guru/news/de-dollar…
The survival of Bretton Woods was never about stability or trust. It was about force. Enforced by gunboats, coups, and the ritual executions of any leader daring to challenge the dollar’s primacy. But the real destroyers of the system were not foreign. They were American. (1/14)
Qaddafi proposed a gold-backed dinar to unite Africa. Within months, NATO turned Libya into rubble and broadcast his sodomy like a trophy. Saddam switched to euros for oil, he was found swinging by his neck after a US occupation. This was the true dollar security model. (2/14)
Read 15 tweets
May 13
India and China got along for 2,000 years. So who taught them to hate each other?
The answer explains everything about the new Cold War. Image
India is in a tough spot. The global chessboard is shifting, and New Delhi has to play like a grandmaster, not a provincial bureaucrat. (1/13)
The U.S. still dominates India’s information space, digital infrastructure, and financial systems. But that grip is getting shaky. The world is moving fast. (2/13)
Read 14 tweets
May 13
Trump's “deal” with China is being sold as a win. In truth, it’s a surrender draped in swagger. A self-inflicted wound repackaged as statesmanship. Let’s unpack the theater behind this so-called triumph.

cnn.com/2025/05/12/bus…
Trump's trade "deal" with China is being hailed as a major win. In reality? It’s a strategic retreat dressed up as a triumph. Here’s how they’re selling a self-inflicted wound as a masterstroke. (1/11)
First, the basics: Trump jacked up tariffs to 145% on Chinese imports. China retaliated. American companies screamed. Now Trump slashes tariffs to 30% and calls it a deal. That’s not a win, that’s undoing your own mess. (2/11)
Read 12 tweets
May 13
Another day, another smug comment about China’s maglev being “not worth it” because of development costs or population trends. Western decline is now measured by how
little it dares to imagine. Time for a rebuttal.

chinaeconomicreview.com/worlds-fastest…
China’s vacuum maglev isn’t just about speed. It’s about supremacy. Calling it too expensive or pointless due to population decline is the kind of lazy take that gets you left behind in the next industrial era. (1/9)
Every transformative tech looks “not worth it” at first. The interstate highway system, the internet, and spaceflight were all massive money sinks before they reshaped the world. China isn’t wasting money. It’s building the future. (2/9)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(