Dan Hitchens Profile picture
May 12, 2025 8 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1. Let’s take a look at some of these “scaremongering and ideological opponents”.

First up, the Association for Palliative Medicine.

The APM opposes the bill due to “concerns about protection of vulnerable, frail, elderly, disabled and terminally ill people”.
2. Former prime minister Gordon Brown.

The bill contains “insufficient protection” for the “frail and vulnerable”, he says.

It would also “alter society’s attitude towards elderly, seriously ill and disabled people”, and damage the identity of “the caring professions”. Image
3. The British Geriatrics Society—the association for professionals specialising in the healthcare of older people.

“The risk for safeguard failure is at least moderate in a modern, well-run AD service which we find to be unacceptable when considering the needs of older people.” Image
4. Disability Rights UK.

“In practice, it would be easier and quicker to access assisted dying in the UK than it would be to access social care support, palliative healthcare, and suitable housing.”

“The committee stage saw the weakening of already insufficient safeguards.” Image
5. Sir David Haslam, former president of the British Medical Association and chair of NICE.

“It is likely to have…a legion of unintended consequences… The elasticity with which assisted dying laws have been applied in other countries should serve as a warning.” Image
6. Liberty, Britain’s leading civil liberties organisation.

“We can only support legalising assisted dying if it works safely for everyone. This Bill doesn’t.” Image
7. Prof Sir Louis Appleby, who leads the National Suicide Prevention Strategy for England.

“Once the principle behind suicide prevention has been set aside...we have lost something we may not get back… That is why I don’t support the Bill.” Image
8. Ashish Kumar, Chair of the Royal College of Psychiatrists’ Eating Disorders Faculty (as well as the Vice-Chair Agnes Ayton).

“We urge MPs to…vote against the bill—it fails the public safety test.” Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dan Hitchens

Dan Hitchens Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ddhitchens

Jan 14
Why is Lord Falconer trying to limit the scrutiny process for his bill?

Here are ten moments so far when Lords scrutiny has exposed the reality of the legislation:
1. Falconer admits people will die under the bill because they are poor.

“Where the reason…is because in your mind you are influenced by your circumstances—for example, because you are poor—should you be barred from having an assisted death...? In my view [you should] not.”
2. Falconer admits people will die because of lack of access to care.

“Of course nobody wants the absence of palliative care to be the reason you apply...

“But we have to give everybody this choice on the basis of the way the world is for them.”
Read 11 tweets
Dec 12, 2025
What are the Lords scrutinising, anyway?

Here are just 15 of the most important subjects they’re debating. For the most part these are issues ignored or swerved by the Commons: Image
1. AS driven by poverty (eg Tanni Grey-Thompson’s amendment, no. 58 on the list).

The Lords are querying whether someone with a six-month prognosis should be receiving lethal drugs when their reason is being poor.

So far bill supporters say this is fine:
2. AS driven by lack of access to palliative care (eg Brown 51).

Peers are concerned that people will request lethal drugs because they can’t access good care.

So far Keir Starmer’s government has pushed hard against strengthening palliative care access:
Read 17 tweets
Nov 23, 2025
A House of Lords appreciation thread.

Here are 20 peers doing a fine job scrutinising the Leadbeater/Falconer bill: Image
1. Baroness Finlay. Former BMA president, major figure in the palliative care world. Knows the whole subject inside out.

Very polite, but consistently makes Lord Falconer look flat-footed by comparison:
2. Lord Carlile. Top barrister and brilliant public speaker.

Here he probes the bill on the subject of psychological manipulation, drawing on his legal experience to suggest it is far more prevalent than people think.
Read 21 tweets
Nov 21, 2025
1. Lord Falconer, 2017: the Lords has the right to reject a bill which wasn’t a manifesto promise.
2. Lord Falconer, 2018: the Salisbury Convention—which limits the Lords’ ability to reject a bill—doesn’t apply if a bill wasn’t part of the governing party’s manifesto.
3. Lord Falconer, 2015: under some circumstances the Lords can reject whatever bills it likes. Image
Read 9 tweets
Sep 20, 2025
Ten things we learnt from the first Lords debate on the assisted suicide bill: Image
1. The Lords is taking this seriously.

Thanks to the efforts of Baroness Berger and others, there will now be evidence sessions to fill in some of the gaps left by the haphazard Commons stage.

A sign that this may be a more grown-up process overall.
2. The House of Lords contains remarkable expertise.

When Baroness Hollins was making this speech, she was next to Baroness Finlay, a leading authority on palliative care, and Lord Stevens, former NHS CEO. All three gave powerful critiques of the bill.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 19, 2025
Dignity in Dying have launched a campaign this week against the phrase “assisted suicide”—and by an amazing coincidence, the first three pro-bill speakers, including the two flanking Lord Falconer, objected to the term.

A few reasons why “assisted suicide” is good terminology: Image
1. Legislative precision. The bill amends the Suicide Act, changing the law on suicide:
2. Psychological reality.

The Royal College of Psychiatrists say their first concern about the bill is that terminal illness is a risk factor for suicide, and that the bill obviously has implications for that fact. Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(