Cato published my review of the ~240 Venezuelans the US government renditioned 2 months ago to Salvador’s notorious prison. We identified FIFTY who came legally, never violated any immigration law, but are imprisoned at the US government’s request and at US taxpayer expense.
When I started researching their methods of an entry, I thought finding 4 such cases would be an unbelievable crime and scandal. In the end, it’s apparent that at least four DOZEN were legal immigrants who came with advanced permission. cato.org/blog/50-venezu…
We identified 2 dozen parolees who entered at ports of entry, another 21 came legally with a CBP One appointment and were immediately detained, 4 refugees who the government determined faced persecution abroad, and one person who entered with a tourist visa.
50 is the minimum # of legal immigrants in the Trump gulag b/c only 174 of the 240 had any info online, likely b/c many families are afraid to speak out or don’t know their loved one is incarcerated. Of those whose method of entry was mentioned, 50 came legally, 40 illegally.
An approximate 50-50 ratio actually makes sense b/c half of the Venezuelans who came in the last 2 years came legally. It also matches a survey of 50 families done by Reuters a few months ago. So it’s possible that in fact, over a HUNDRED came legally.
We can't fully profile these legal immigrants b/c they were disappeared w/o warning and are being held incommunicado. They’ve been unable to speak to ANYONE outside the torture prison for 2 months, and the US govt is saying it’d be INSANE to release any info about them:
Still, DHS continues to slander & lie about them, calling them all “illegal aliens.” When confronted with the lies, DHS lies more. For instance, it says Ricardo “entered illegally at a port of entry via the CBP One.” It litearlly just describes a legal entry as "illegal"
It says Jerce Reyes Barrios, an ex-professional soccer player, “was in the US illegally.” It's undisputed that he came LEGALLY, DHS denied him status b/c of his tattoos. Here's DHS: “We’re doing this b/c they are illegal.” Why are they illegal? “We made them illegal.”
We found DHS labeling LEGAL immigrants gang members for tattoos: roses, clocks, playing cards covering up a scar from a childhood accident, a Puerto Rican song lyric, the Real Madrid logo, a callout to Call Of Duty videogame, many crowns w/ loved ones’ names like these on Andry:
Numerous reviews (CBS, NY Times, + Bloomberg) have found very few of the renditioned men had criminal records in the US or abroad. Our review found just 2 legal immigrants with a US criminal conviction, both for minor drug offenses.
Here’s our 1st profile. Widmer Josneyder Agelviz Sanguino entered the United States legally as a refugee. He was extensively vetted abroad including in-person before coming to the US, but was still detained and renditioned. This is criminal behavior by the USG.
A majority of the men were fathers. Altogether, they were supporting 44 children. Many had spouses. The US govt did not inform their families of the reason for their disappearance, nor were they informed. Legal immigrants were literally disappeared without a trace AND LIED TO
These legal immigrants are being treated worse than murderers are in the US. They had no right to legal representation, no trials before imprisonment, were disappeared, and are now imprisoned indefinitely in conditions that SCOTUS has said would violate the 8th amendment.
You can read the whole thing here. In my wildest dreams, I would never have thought to accuse the Trump administration of planning something like this. This is clearly a crime, and DHS Sec. Noem and others should be impeached for it: cato.org/blog/50-venezu…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨Your US government has kidnapped this child. Not family separation. Kidnapping. It took a 2-year-old child from her parents, deported the mom to Venezuela, and have imprisoned the dad in a Salvadoran torture prison without charge or trial. Every day, new evil level reached
THEY ARE INVENTING CONVICTIONS. The White House says the father was convicted of prostitution offenses but it's impossible: he was never even inside the US. Criminal checks reveal no such crimes in both the US and Venezuela. The mom isn't even alleged to have convictions
What explains Trump's immigration agenda? It's not about legal immigration. He is the most anti-legal immigrant president ever. He is stripping legal immigrants of their status, arresting them, detaining them and deporting them.... It's also not about...
citizenship or nationality. He wants to strip citizenship and nationality from Americans, and he wants to foreclose citizens' rights to associate with immigrants. He wants to be able to intentionally arrest and deport citizens....
So what's it about? It's about limiting the rights of people in the US to as small a group of people as possible. Why? Because fewer rights mean more power for him to control the economy and society and manipulate people into following his commands.
Recall that Kristi Noem deliberately deported eight WOMEN to a MALE prison in El Salvador. It was only the conscience of Salvadoran officials (reporting to THE DICTATOR) who corrected this monstrous evil. Noem should be immediately impeached and removed from office.
Recall further that Kristi Noem "accidentally" deported a Nicaraguan woman to El Salvador, despite the Salvadorans only agreeing to accept Venezuelans. Again, it was only corrected by "THE DICTATOR." No one cared. No one still cares. They'd do it again in a minute.
39% of the detainees disappeared to the Guantanamo offshore prison were deemed "low threat" by the Trump administration. Some of the individuals being detained at Guantanamo did not cross illegally, legally requesting asylum at a port of entry.
For over 2 weeks, people were being detained with no way to reach a lawyer. It was only yesterday in response to this lawsuit any effort was made to protect their rights. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Again, this is according to the Trump administration's own declarations! They are detaining low-risk offenders at an offshore prison, including people who have never violated any law.
Among the most commonly accepted and yet utterly baseless political theories out there is the idea that you can "satisfy" nativist urges by giving into some of their demands. How much history do you need to refute this?
Did the Chinese Exclusion Act satisfy nativism?
The Japanese Gentlemen's Agreement?
The Asiatic Bar Zone?
The literacy act?
The 2-year Emergency Quota Act?
The Permanent National Origins Quota Act?
1930 public charge visa ban?
Deporting Mexicans?
Blocking Jews?
Blocking Jews did provoke a pro-immigration effect, but it didn't "satisfy" nativism. It embarrassed it, humiliated it, refuted it, exposed eugenics for the moral monster it was. This eventually led to the reform of the National Origins Act and the Refugee Act....
Here are some funny exchanges from @bryan_caplan & @DanielDiMartino at @sfliberty.
-Caplan: "Why don't you restrict childbirth based on projected net fiscal burden like you want to do with immigration?"
-DiMartino: "It's immoral. I'd never support deporting even homeless Americans if it saves govt money."
-Caplan: "Oh, now it's immoral. Why?"
-DiMartino: "It's different. You're assuming everyone has a right to come like everyone born here has a right to be here."
-Caplan: "Why assume that everyone born here has a right to be here?"
-DiMartino: "Well, some people, I guess, do want us to change that..."
-Caplan: "Uh, yeah..." [chuckle]
-DiMartino: "But I'm not making a moral argument."
Wait, weren't you?
DiMartino: One of our first restrictions was ideological. We banned anarchists!
Caplan: So you'd ban much of this audience?
DiMartino: There were different kinds of anarchists.
Caplan: So you trust the govt to decide the good anarchists from the bad anarchists? [laughter]
Note: DiMartino would ban the only libertarian head of state: Milei, a self-described anarcho-capitalist (who he supports)
DiMartino: We should at least try to ban communists, just like we ban guns on airplanes.
Moderator: Not the right audience for banning guns.
DiMartino: Oh yeah... [laughter]