Stephen Griffin Profile picture
May 21 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock Rajeev. SARS2 waves are still driven almost entirely by virus evolution with very little influence from extraneous factors. Hence, it remains unpredictable, not cyclical.
The dynamics between viral variation and immunity dictate the scale of epidemic waves as well as severity.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock Yes, the individual risk of severe acute COVID has been dramatically reduced by vaccines, but this scales by prevalence at population level. E.g. ~12-13K certificated deaths in the UK during 2024, ~60% as underlying.
The other issue is morbidity. #LongCovid & latent sequelae.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock Govt guidance focuses very much on the individual risk, and it's understandable that individual clinicians may not appreciate the population impact.
However, as we r seeing yet again in SE Asia, when balance favours the virus, there is no doubting the additional health burden.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock Little additional provision now exists to deal with this, it ought to be managed by vax and population level, multi layered mitigations, which also safeguard vs other diseases and pollution.
We managed these poorly in 2019, so reverting to type without learning is ridiculous.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock I stress that this needs to come from the top down, as we are told relentlessly by @WHO, vax means many of us can, as you say, operate essentially normally in many ways. But, every infection is a roll of the dice, and #LongCovid continues to grow despite "mild" initial infection.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock @WHO It is also essential to remember that this is a privilege afforded to us by unprecedented success of the COVID vaccines, which some now either take for granted or, bizarrely, attack via disinformation...aka US Health and Human Services since January.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock @WHO But, there remains a large number of people unable to mount a vaccine response, who remain essentially stuck in 2020 as we all "get on with it"
They are marooned by the lack of societal mitigations, the politicised attitudes to masks, vax, etc, and farcical IPC ignoring aerosols.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock @WHO Access to therapeutics has diminished dramatically, same for testing, and the lackadaisical attitudes of the "Just a cold" crew make it impossible for these folks to make risk assessments in every day life.
They, and their families/carers have been forgotten, this is a travesty.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock @WHO Until we realise that CoV pandemics appear different to previous influenza's, that chronic disease is under recognised and impacts many more people than Govts will accept, and that viruses are held in check by immunity rather than "becoming milder" (see measles!), this continues.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock @WHO We mustn't forget @cv_cev, that SARS2 evolves incredibly quickly, and causes complex pathology.
It may well be that your personal experience is absolutely what you described during the interview, but we all need to take a step back and do something about the big picture.
@RajeevJayadevan @CoronaHeadsUp @gwladwr @red_loeb @PJeffcock @WHO @cv_cev Apologies for the rant, but if we don't sort this out then the COVID pandemic will continue to afflict this planet, and we will be in a sorry state to deal with whatever comes next...#H5N1

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Griffin

Stephen Griffin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SGriffin_Lab

Jan 2
At the risk of sounding like a broken record...

1. Lockdown is an extreme response. There should only have been one.
2. The fact that there was >1 is due to policy failure and meddling from eejit GBD types, PRE-VACCINE🤬💔
3. Kids are NOT invulnerable.

thetimes.com/article/5a939c…
4. Failures to act quickly, unlocking too soon, and lack of mitigations set in place just continued the roller coaster ride.
5. Restrictions highlighted and exacerbated preexisting inequalities. As @covidinquiryuk shows, #Austerity, #Brexshit
6. "Key workers" faced higher risks.
7. Re kids, misguided narratives that kids somehow magically were not infected/affected/able to transmit SARS2 are, put simply, bollocks.
The harm done by this was, and continues to be, criminal, IMHO. Yet, it is still perpetuated by some who, frankly, ought to know better.
Read 22 tweets
Nov 28, 2024
OK, I have a busy day, but I've been asked about why I've criticised the GBD, antivax rhetoric etc...

First, re vaccines, see my 📌. TLDR, they're not perfect, no medicine is, but lies about modifying our DNA, mass cardiovascular problems, graphene, pharma/WEF/Gates plots are 💩
On to GBD itself...and I must be brief, you could write an essay.
Amongst its many flaws, the GBD would never work because:
1. When you segregate society, bad things happen.
2. Vulnerable people have just as much right to a life as anyone else & already put up with too much.
3. Identifying "vulnerable people" isn't easy...just look at the exclusions from vax programmes nowadays.
4. We're all one Doctor's appointment away from "vulnerable"
5. The invulnerable...aren't.
6. Individual risk scales by prevalence. Don't quote %s at me, you utter plonkers🤦‍♀️
Read 10 tweets
Nov 13, 2024
I'm still curious to understand what the "bespoke model" involves.

What THIS involves is an even narrower offer for free vaccines in the UK.

This is a striking difference to the US (for now 😬), which offers KP2 mRNA for all >6m.

TLDR, false economy🧵

gov.uk/government/pub…
I'm not going to go into details, mainly cos it makes me so angry to sit reading it for any length of time.

Also, the bespoke model leaves me dumbfounded. What follows are generalisations, mainly because this is basically an iteration of the 23 model, where this attrition began.
First, yet again, the focus, or rather the most favourable cost-effectiveness, is avoiding deaths and acute hospitalisation.

Of course, this is critical, especially as we still do nothing to mitigate uncontrolled prevalence, and I include effective vaccination in this regard.
Read 16 tweets
Oct 20, 2024
We have a very safe, efficacious paediatric SARS2 mRNA vax, used 6m+.
Reduced dose and age minimises small risk of myocarditis seen in adolescents.
This sobering study by @katebrown220, @chrischirp et al shows 6m+ kids are always at risk from acute COVID.

Maternal antibodies should help protect newborns during the first 6m of life, but this is optimal when mums are vaxd during pregnancy. Sadly, this only happens if your term coincides with a booster campaign 🙄, which is just plain daft. Highlighted many times by @VikiLovesFACS
The first exposure to a pathogen is always the highest risk, no matter what age it occurs.
Whilst kids tend to develop severe symptoms less frequently than adults, this is the wrong comparison and does NOT mean they are invulnerable.
Both short term and long term problems arise.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 21, 2024
Sorry, looooong thread, but hopefully done soon!
Where was I?
So, let's say the small elite team of virus particles has survived the journey and landed where they want to be...
First, they will encounter innate barriers, eg mucus, which they must cross to physically reach a cell.
There will also be complement, mucosal antibodies (if host is immune), and these can both inactivate and clump viruses together such that phagocytic cells literally eat them up!
So, many of the hurdles from the way out also hit on the way in, and this time, numbers are limiting.
So, viruses need to infect their target cell as quickly as possible before they succumb to defenses.
This mainly depends on the affinity of the viral attachment protein for the cellular receptor used to gain entry. But you have to both unlock the door AND walk through it...
Read 18 tweets
Aug 21, 2024
Lots of good debate about virus transmission, yet it's dwarfed by mis/disinformation and lack of nuance, allowing eejits to dismiss the precautionary principle, or, worse, re-run 1980s bigotted attitudes🤬
Viruses don't fit easily into boxes. So, nuances of transmission, a 🧵
I will focus on the example of airborne transmission, but the underlying principles apply to all modes of infection.

Caveat: I research the start/end of the transmission process, but the middle bit is not my forte, so forgive omissions/errors!🙏
See @ukhadds for added nuance!
Right, so I would define transmission as the transfer of sufficient infectious virus from a site of infection or environmental source to an individual, followed by the successful establishment of a productive infection (ie the completion of the life cycle) within the new host.
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(