The Right wins elections, and the Left pretends to magically rediscover the Constitution, the rule of law and free speech.
Don't fall for it. đź§µ
Last week, 60 Minutes' Scott Pelley gave a dramatic commencement speech warning that "our sacred rule of law is under attack. Journalism is under attack. Universities are under attack. Freedom of speech is under attack."
We've heard these lines a million times before.
Today's corporate press has an extraordinary hero complex—they imagine themselves as fearless, courageous defenders of democracy and freedom, as brave as the boys on the beaches at D-Day, risking it all to fight tyranny.
They want us to believe they're "speaking truth to power."
All they did for the past four years was cover and shill for the most powerful institutions and actors on the planet.
The media is the propaganda arm of a public-private regime—spanning Big Tech, academia, the administrative state, etc—that works in lockstep to advance leftism.
When it served the Left's interests to have Biden in power, the press worked overtime to convince everyone he was mentally fit. When that failed—when his decline was so visible that it became a liability for the Left—they turned in unison to push him out.
60 Minutes itself—which Scott Pelley is the face of—is currently being sued for deceptively editing a Kamala Harris interview in the heat of the 2024 campaign cycle.
Does that sound like fearless, independent journalism, speaking truth to power without fear or favor?
Where were the Scott Pelleys of the world when Biden’s White House was literally coordinating with Big Tech to silence dissent?
When the DOJ targeted concerned parents at school board meetings?
When the FBI spied on traditional Catholics and deemed them "violent extremists"?
At best, they were silent. Most of them were active participants.
As AG of Missouri, I sued to expose Biden's vast censorship enterprise. We took it all the way to the Supreme Court. The press attacked us—and ran cover for Biden—every step of the way.
And it's not just the press—it's every elite left-wing institution.
Now that President Trump is pushing for long-overdue reforms at Harvard, for example, the university and its powerful allies are suddenly VERY concerned about threats to "academic freedom" and free speech.
Harvard has been ranked dead last for college free speech for the last two years in a row.
Dead. Last.
Out of ~250 colleges and universities.
For two years in a row.
The jokes write themselves.
The dramatic lectures about "protecting our democracy" were so common during the first Trump Admin that they're now the butt of a joke.
Ironically, "protecting our democracy" was the same line the Left used to justify its unprecedented crackdown on basic freedoms under Biden.
That's because they don't mean a word of what they say. Not really. All of these arguments are a cynical means to an end—an "any weapon at hand" approach to politics.
Beneath the moral preening, that's what all this boils down to—helping their friends and hurting their enemies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Hur audio makes unavoidable what free thinking Americans had known—for most (all) of his four years, Joe Biden was mentally incapable of serving as President.
It's why I was the first Senator to call for the 25th Amend.
The deeper question—who was running our country? 🧵
Axios finally published the long-sought-after audio from Special Counsel Robert Hur's 2023 interview of President Biden regarding Biden's classified documents found near his Corvette.
🚨 SCOTUS just heard arguments on President Trump's birthright citizenship order.
This case is big. It isn't just about birthright citizenship—it's about the limits of how rogue judges can use nationwide injunctions.
My prediction: Trump could be on the cusp of a big win. đź§µ
Solicitor General John Sauer (who was my Solicitor General back in my AG days) argued for President Trump. Right out of the gate, multiple liberal justices were swinging for his head, but they could never land the critical blow on Teflon John.
While birthright citizenship is the subject matter of the "merits," SCOTUS is more likely to address a critical procedural question and dodge the merits.
That question: Can courts issue nationwide injunctions or must courts address questions of group relief in class actions?
Illegals who broke our laws to enter the US aren’t due the same process as citizens.
SCOTUS and the Constitution agree: illegals' rights are limited, especially in deportation.
President Trump will deport millions of illegals without a hearing. Here's how. đź§µ
In 1996, back Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which created "expedited removal" for certain classes of illegal aliens who had been in the country less than two years.
What process are they entitled to under expedited removal? Only a finding by a DHS officer that an alien is 1. here illegally and 2. in a category covered by expedited removal.
In most circumstances: No hearing, no habeas, no appeals.
And there it is: Proof that the FBI covered up the political motive behind the 2017 congressional baseball shooting.
The shooter was a left-wing extremist who explicitly set out to kill GOP congressmen. The FBI knew this. But they told the public it was just “suicide by cop.” 🧵
This stuff isn't "incompetence." It's specific, intentional ideological corruption. The FBI—like so many other institutions in American life—has become a vehicle for manipulating and shaping public narratives to serve left-wing interests.
And the media is eager to help:
The new House GOP report shows, in detail, how the FBI actively sought to suppress the overwhelming evidence that the shooter was acting on explicitly political motives—including concealing his handwritten list of Republican targets.
Amazon spent decades profiting off of America Last trade policies.
First, they tried to attack President Trump's trade policies with this silly stunt. Then, they got hit for it. Now they're trying to back-pedal.
But it's too late. đź§µ
Amazon refuses to tell its users where most of their products are made—or if (and when) they’re made in foreign sweatshops. I bet you can guess why.
But NOW, you see, they're all about "transparency"!
You can't serve in the military if you have asthma.
But because of two federal judges, we have to bend over backwards to accommodate a "condition" that requires lifelong hormones and multiple surgeries?
We need to fight this. đź§µ
At the outset of his administration, President Trump signed a common-sense executive order barring transgender military service. In February, the Pentagon issued a memo affirming that people with a history of gender dysphoria are "incompatible" with U.S. military service.
Two federal judges didn't just block the policy—they ordered the Pentagon to immediately resume providing "gender-affirming medical care" to transgender military service members.
That includes hormone therapy and sex-change surgeries.