If you're an especially talented graduate student in STEM, you can get a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to help pay for graduate school.
These are competitive, much sought-after awards called NSF GRFPs.
—>
2/ You apply as you head to grad school. NSF awards about 4,000 a year—but each fellowship is for 3 to 5 years of funding.
The award is tuition + a small stipend to reduce the need to TA.
Students get the grants, but in practice, they go straight to universities from NSF.
—>
3/ These are prestigious. Yes, you're in to Michigan or Texas or Stanford or MIT—and top of that, you got an NSF GRFP to pay for a couple years.
They go to the top of the top grad students.
US citizens only. No international students.
What's the crisis?
—>
4/ NSF just cancelled all the NSF grants for Harvard graduate students.
Dozens & dozens, maybe hundreds, of Harvard PhD students in the sciences just had their funding pulled.
Not just Harvard students, the top of the heap in computer science and biology and physics.
—>
5/ Trump is literally destroying the on-going education of a wave of the top grad students in the US—to what purpose?
These are not 'terrorists' or international students. They're Americans in the 3rd or 4th or 5th year of their science PhD work.
All they do is work.
—>
6/ They are trying to master all the science that's been figured out in the last 50 years, then invent & create & discover the science of the next 50 years.
Trump just slammed the door in their faces.
…They were told they'd be paid in June.
After that, unclear.
What?
—>
7/ Someone from MAGA world explain how this advances American greatness.
Someone explain how these grad students are responsible for whatever you're angry about at Harvard. (Most of which is wildly overstated in any case.)
—>
8/ By the way: You can 'transfer' to a different grad school.
Grad school doesn't work the way undergraduate years work.
If you're a sophomore at Tufts, you can transfer to Georgetown for junior year — if you can get in.
Not in a PhD program.
—>
9/ So we just knee-capped 100+ of the very best science grad students in the country, for absolutely not reason or purpose—and what are they supposed to do now?
One more thing: Try getting this work done while your university is being relentlessly mortared every day.
—>
10/ Trump said he was going to unleash greatness across the land.
Cure cancer.
Usher in a new golden age for the US economy.
You know what creates greatness? Brilliant people doing fresh, innovative work.
—>
11/ Imagine hooking a farm tiller to a tractor.
You board the tractor & run the tiller up & down one of Donald Trump's golf courses. Every hole, every fairway, every green.
At #18, you turn around & gaze upon the destroyed golf course and say, 'Now THAT'S a golf course.'
—>
12/ That's what Donald Trump is doing to Harvard.
By any measure, pure insanity.
You CANNNOT transfer to a different grad school. Talk about a brutal typo. Sorry about that!
(X does not let you edit threads for some reason.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If you’re curious when fascism arrives in the US, it has. A US President attacking individual companies & institutions by name—and threatening ‘punishment’ if they don’t comply with his whims.
6 days ago: Walmart
Yesterday: Harvard
Today: Apple — *must* make iPhones in US
—>
2/ That’s not the way American democracy & capitalism work. Trump doesn’t get to decide what Walmart charges for back-to-school supplies.
Trump doesn’t get to decide who enrolls at Harvard.
Trump doesn’t tell Apple where to make products.
This is the test.
Right. Now.
—>
3/ Trump didn’t pick small, less powerful, less well-known organizations.
Walmart.
Harvard.
Apple.
Everyone in the whole world knows those names. Knows those brands. Knows they are the pinnacle of American achievement.
Those are the places Trump is maliciously attacking.
In the trade 'deal' with China, the US got nothing.
We're mostly back to where we were before the global trade war started—before Donald Trump started the global trade war.
The Chinese conceded nothing.
Indeed, from the outside, China won this round.
—>
2/ An economist from Hong Kong explains:
'From China’s perspective, the outcome of this meeting is a success, as China took a tough stance on the US threat of high tariffs & eventually managed to get the tariffs down significantly without making concessions.'
The chaos…
—>
3/ …The chaos for American business these last 5 weeks has been incredibly costly—financially, psychologically, in terms of planning, morale, a sense of predictability about the future.
You know how sometimes, you follow the weather & you know the blizzard is coming tomorrow morning, but today it's 39º & crystalline sunshine, & you can't quite believe the blizzard's coming?
But you can look at the radar and, yup, it's coming.
That's where we are now.
—>
2/ We know that in the next month, almost nothing is coming by ship to US from China & Chinese factories.
Ships full of merchandise, not coming.
The Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach has said cargo for the next couple weeks is down 36%.
Fascinating element of Harvard's refusal to buckle to the Trump Administration today.
Who are Harvard's lawyers in this matter?
#1 is Robert K. Hur.
Sound familiar? Trump named him US Attorney for Maryland.
—>
2/ Then Robert Hur was the special counsel who investigated Pres. Biden's mishandling of classified documents. Hur as the one who said Biden was 'an elderly man with a poor memory.' And declined to charge Biden.
That's Harvard lawyer #1.
—>
3/ Harvard lawyer #2 is William A. Burck.
Currently a member of the Board of Directors of Fox Corp., the owner of FoxNews.
Burck served as special counsel to the Republican House task force that investigated the attempted assassination of Pres. Trump.
Could Trump's tariffs spark a US factory & manufacturing renaissance?
Let's say they do.
Here's the problem, even if we double the number of factories the US has now. Even if we—somehow—start making microwave ovens and pleated-front chinos and pillow cases in the US again.
—>
2/ There won't be many jobs.
Factory automation for routine, repetitive manufacturing is very far along.
It's so widespread that there's a phrase in the manufacturing world:
'Lights-out factories.'
…Factories with so few people, they keep the lights off.
—>
3/ Machines don't need lights. So many big companies—including consumer products companies like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Foxconn—run factories with just a scattering of staff who monitor the machines.
Like in a quiet office, the lights only come on when a person walks in.