Philosophy & Theology 🇺🇸🇻🇦 Profile picture
May 29 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The oldest known Christian hymn -- dating to before the Council of Nicaea -- is being sung again after 1,800 years.

But what’s truly amazing?

It’s explicitly Trinitarian, long before Nicaea or Constantine.

Here’s what you need to know: 🧵👇1/ Image
The hymn, found in Oxyrhynchus, Egypt, is preserved on a Greek papyrus dated to around 250 A.D. -- decades before the Council of Nicaea (325 A.D.).

It’s one of the earliest pieces of Christian music ever discovered. What does it say? 2/
“Let all be silent, the shining stars not sound forth, all rushing rivers be stilled as we sing our hymn to the Father, Son, the Holy Spirit, as all powers cry out in answer, Amen, Amen, might, praise and glory forever to our God, the only giver of all good gifts.” 3/
Notice the structure:

- The hymn is sung "to the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit." Three persons.

- The hymn praises and glorifies "our God, the only giver." One God.

So: Three persons, but "only" one "giver of all good gifts," "our God." Sound familiar? 4/
That’s why this matters:

Some like @ThoughtfulSaint claim the Trinity was a late invention, born of Greek philosophy in the "4th century."

But this hymn shows that early Christians were worshiping the Triune God long before any Greek council. 5/ Image
And the 200s is just the date of the hymn. Unless we imagine that it is the first time Christians got together to worship the Trinity, the hymn reflects far more ancient beliefs. Christians wrote hymns about the Trinity because they had already long believed in the Trinity. 6/
As one Bible scholar, John Dickson, explained: "What is notable ... is the certainty with which the song presents the Trinity, although it predates by generations the Council of Nicaea, in 325 AD." 7/ Image
He continues: "This is the doctrine of the Trinity....And you sometimes hear that that idea was only invented much later, say, in 325, at the Council of Nicaea, when Emperor Constantine forced this doctrine on the church." 8/ Image
So the Trinity isn't a late interpretation of Scripture, which affirms One God (Mk. 12:29–32; 1 Cor. 8:4; 1 Tim. 2:5; James 2:19), and three divine persons who are God (Jn. 1:1-14; Titus 2:13; Mt. 28:19). Early Christians were Trinitarians, and put their faith into practice. 9/
Want to learn more about the hymn and even hear it sung? Look up thefirsthymnmovie dot com.

Sources:
- Diana Chandler, The First Hymn: Resurrected third-century praise song set for pre-Easter release (Apr. 8, 2025)
- Foust, The Oldest Christian Hymn Ever Found is Being Sung Again after 1,800 Years (Apr. 15, 2025) 10/10

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Philosophy & Theology 🇺🇸🇻🇦

Philosophy & Theology 🇺🇸🇻🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LexetPhil

Feb 15
Popular-level Calvin apologist James White says ‘there was no Pope, not even a single bishop, in Rome’ when Ignatius lived, around AD 108. Is he right? Let’s find out.

🧵 👇
White makes a bad argument from silence: Ignatius doesn’t mention a bishop of Rome in his letter to Rome, so there must not be one! The problem: Ignatius was under Roman guard on his way to being fed to lions in the Colosseum! He would’ve been a fool if he identified his Roman counterpart. 2/Image
But what he *does* say strongly implies that Rome had a bishop. In his letter to the Trallians—written around the same time—he says that ‘no group can be called a church’ without ‘the bishop.’ So here’s what we’d want to know: Did Ignatius call Rome a Church? If so, he probably thought it had a bishop. 3/Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 27, 2021
A Parable on Corpus Linguistics: On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test the Linguist. “Linguist,” he asked, “what must I do to correctly interpret this Law?” “What is written in the Law?” he replied. “How do you read it?”
The Judge answered, “the Law says, ‘no person shall bear arms at or near any bank.’ This proscribes carrying arms at or near rivers or lakes.”
“You have answered incorrectly,” the Linguist replied, “this means that no person shall perform any military service at or near financial institutions.” But the Judge wanted the Linguist to justify himself, so he asked, “And how did you come to that conclusion?”
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(