Western Civilization has largely been a force for good.
A prime example is the British Empire. In many places it occupied it:
-raised the standard of living
-developed infrastructure
-promoted education
It also single-handedly ended slavery for much of the world…🧵
Though Britain had been a global power since the early 17th century, it wasn’t until Napoleon's defeat at Waterloo in 1815 that it emerged as the dominant power.
By eliminating France from the world’s stage, Britain was left without a serious competitor.
The Vienna Treaty that followed favored the Brits, granting them territorial possessions like modern-day South Africa, Trinidad, and Sri Lanka.
These territories served as strategic naval bases Britain used to control its immense empire from all corners of the globe.
The century following Napoleon's defeat is sometimes called the “Pax Britannica,” because of the relative prosperity enjoyed by Europe during this time. The presence of a single world power created stability and kept conflicts to a minimum.
Britain’s unmatched navy is what maintained its dominance.
The British Royal Navy was more than twice the size of the next largest navy. Though their ships weren’t vastly superior to others’, their sailors were at sea continuously making them the best in the world.
British ships controlled most of the key trade routes in Asia, North America, and Africa, allowing its merchants and traders an overwhelming advantage compared to other nations—Britain got incredibly rich off sea power.
But Britain didn’t just use its Naval supremacy to fill its coffers. Its navy actually became a source of peace and stability.
British ships were on the frontline during one of the darkest episodes in Western history: the slave trade.
Decades before the American Civil War and 13th amendment ended slavery in the US, Britain passed two anti-slavery laws: the “Slave Trade Act 1807” banning the slave trade around the empire, and the “Slavery Abolition Act 1833” which officially made it illegal to own slaves.
Britain enforced its legislation via their strong navy.
Ship captains who were caught transporting slaves were subject to fine initially, but soon the Royal Navy declared all perpetrators of slave trading to be treated the same as pirates—the punishment for piracy was death.
Britain's ships were the “global policemen” in the 19th century, and along the West coast of Africa became highly successful in capturing slave ships and freeing slaves.
They basically declared war on the African slave trade in a move called the “blockade of Africa.”
In 1808, a fleet called the West Africa Squadron was formed to patrol the African coast and catch slave ships. In the following decades they seized an estimated 1,600 slave ships and freed a whopping 150,000 Africans slaves.
African kingdoms were also encouraged to sign anti-slavery treaties. Over 50 African rulers signed them, and for ones that didn't, “corrective action” was taken—sometimes fighting slavery meant using the full force of the British Navy.
While some illegal trade continued in far-off regions, by the middle of the 19th-century the Atlantic slave trade was almost completely eradicated.
Slavery outside the empire’s jurisdiction, however, would continue for hundreds of years in some places.
No nation on earth did more to eliminate slavery than Britain.
Though empires are often viewed as inherently tyrannical, Britain’s war on slavery shows that immense power can, in some cases, be channeled for good.
Though its rule wasn't always benevolent, Britain's success against slavery is proof that Western powers have often used their immense power for the benefit of mankind.
Enjoy this content?
By subscribing to our newsletter, you'll get access to our reading list:
Ever wonder how the West gained geographical and cultural influence over its global peers?
Historian Niall Ferguson claims in his book “Civilization” that the West gained its power by embracing six killer applications — what are they?🧵
1. Competition
During the 15th century European powers competed globally to acquire resources, especially spices, fueling an arms race in maritime expansion—Europe’s “spice race”.
Meanwhile, China embraced an isolationist policy after Zheng He’s last voyage in the 1430’s.
The extreme political and religious divisions in Europe also differed from the cultural uniformity of the Chinese Empire. These divisions created competition between and within European states, increasing the desire to create colonies overseas.
On May 20th, 1910, nine kings gathered at Windsor for the funeral of King Edward VII.
The photograph they took is a stark reminder of how drastically European leadership has changed—the men pictured remain symbols of a bygone era of monarchy.
Who were they?🧵
King Haakon VII of Norway (top row, far left)
Ruled from November 1905 until his death in 1957. After the 1905 dissolution of the union between Sweden and Norway, he became the first independent Norwegian monarch since Olaf II in 1387.
Tsar Ferdinand of the Bulgarians (top row, second from left)
Ruled as Tsar during the tumultuous First World War. After a series of military setbacks in 1918, he abdicated the throne in a bid to save the monarchy. His eldest son succeeded him, becoming Tsar Boris III.
Thomas Carlyle was one of the most prolific writers of the 19th century. His main thesis?
Heroes are born, not made.
But today he's dismissed — why?
Because his idea threatens everything modern history tries to teach us.
Let’s talk about the Great Man Theory🧵
Thomas Carlyle was a 19th-century Scottish essayist, historian, and philosopher who gave a series of lectures on heroism in 1840, which were later published into a book called “Heroes and Hero-Worship.”
One of the book’s main theses was the Great Man Theory of history.
Carlyle argued that heroes shape history through both their personal attributes and “divine inspiration”—the world essentially turns on the ideas and decisions of elite men.
Rooted in self-confidence, it was known as "Manifest Destiny".
It inspired a people to conquer a continent — and push the boundaries of possibility...🧵
The term “manifest destiny” first appeared in an article by newspaper editor John O'Sullivan in 1845.
O'Sullivan, described as "always full of grand and world-embracing schemes," used the phrase in the midst of the ongoing Oregon boundary dispute with Britain.
He wrote it was America’s destiny to control North America:
“And that claim is by the right of our manifest destiny to overspread and to possess the whole of the continent which Providence has given us for the development of the great experiment of liberty…”