Students For Liberty Profile picture
Jun 2, 2025 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Karl Marx said he had discovered the scientific laws of economics.

Value came from labor.

Profit was theft.

Only central planning could build a just society.

But four Austrian economists—Menger, Böhm-Bawerk, Mises, and Hayek—tore his theory apart. 🧵 Image
Marx said value comes from labor.

Carl Menger said: value comes from us.

In Principles of Economics (1871), he showed that value is subjective. It depends on the preferences of individuals—changing across people, places, and time.

A violin is priceless to a musician, worthless to someone else. Food is worth more to the starving than to the full.

Labor doesn’t determine value.

Human needs do.Image
Marx said capitalists exploit workers.

Eugen Böhm-Bawerk introduced a different explanation: time preference.

Workers value present income. Capitalists provide that income now in exchange for uncertain profits later.

They take the risk, front the capital, and hope it pays off.

Profit is not exploitation. It’s compensation for time, risk, and planning.Image
But what if we abolished capitalism?

How would the state know what to produce?

Ludwig von Mises asked this in 1920—and proved socialism couldn’t answer it.

Without prices, there’s no way to compare costs or plan tradeoffs.

No real prices = no real economy.

He didn’t say socialism lacked morality.

He said it lacked logic.Image
F.A. Hayek went further.

He argued that no central planner could match the knowledge spread across society.

Prices aren’t just numbers. They’re signals—reflecting local needs, priorities, and scarcities.

Prices reflect that knowledge. They allow individuals to coordinate without any central planner needing to understand the full picture.

No expert, no algorithm, no five-year plan can replace that.Image
By the mid-20th century, Marxist economics had collapsed.

Menger refuted the labor theory of value.

Böhm-Bawerk dismantled surplus value.

Mises exposed the limits of planning.

Hayek explained why decentralization matters.

The Austrians didn’t just critique Marx. They offered a more coherent framework—rooted in individual choice, not class struggle.Image
So why does it matter now?

Because Marx’s bad ideas never die.

Price controls.

Central planning.

The constant vilification of profit.

Every time we forget what crushed Marxism, it crawls back—under new slogans, with old consequences. Image
Most students never learn this story.

They don’t know how Marx fell.

They don’t know why the Austrians won.

And they don’t realize how many of today’s bad ideas echo the same fallacies—just with friendlier branding. Image
Want to go deeper?

We made a short, free email course called How to Not Be an NPC on Tariffs.

Inside, you’ll learn:

– Why tariffs are about power, not just trade

– Who wins, who loses—and why

– What economists don’t say on cable news

– How these debates still shape our world

Start here → go.studentsforliberty.org/learn-tariffs/Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Mar 21
The world's greatest botanist died of starvation in a Soviet prison.

His crime: refusing to say plants worked the way Stalin needed them to. 🧵 Image
By 1940, Nikolai Vavilov had done something no scientist in history had accomplished. He traveled 64 countries, collected 250,000 plant specimens, and built the largest seed bank on earth.

His goal had nothing to do with academic prestige. He wanted to end famine.

Vavilov understood that agricultural resilience depends on genetic diversity: the difference between a food supply surviving a drought or collapsing is measured in seeds.Image
The Vavilov Institute in Leningrad held seeds from every corner of the world. Wild wheat from Afghanistan. Rice landraces from Southeast Asia. Potato varieties from the Andes.

In the most literal sense, it was an insurance policy for human civilization.

Every seed preserved was a future problem solved. Vavilov thought of science the way an engineer thinks of load-bearing structures: you build for the crisis you haven't seen yet.Image
Read 9 tweets
Mar 20
A rapper just defended the Bill of Rights better than most politicians ever have.

The police raided his house. Destroyed his door. Found nothing. And then sued him for making songs about it.

The jury took less than a day. 🧵 Image
In August 2022, Adams County Sheriff's deputies arrived at Afroman's Ohio home under a warrant alleging drug trafficking and kidnapping.

They broke down his front door, ransacked the property, and took $400 in cash that officials later claimed had been "miscounted" during the search.

Authorities found no drugs, no kidnapping victims, and filed no charges.Image
The Fourth Amendment was written for exactly this moment.

The Founders had lived under general warrants: blanket government authority to search homes, seize property, and answer to no one.

They made that unconstitutional. A warrant must specify the place to be searched and the things to be seized, and when the state acts on bad information and causes damage, accountability belongs to the state. Not the citizen.Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 18
A man who spent less than a year in America understood it better than most people born here.

He wrote down how it could slowly fall apart.

We may be watching it unfold right now. 🧵 Image
In 1831, a 25-year-old Frenchman came to America not to flatter it or indict it, but because a functioning self-governing republic was almost unprecedented in human history.

He wanted to understand how it actually worked. Image
Alexis de Tocqueville didn't find America's strength in its constitution, its geography, or its natural resources.

He found it in something harder to see: citizens solving problems without being told to, governing themselves at the local level, forming associations for every conceivable purpose. Not because the law required it. Because they had the character and the habit.

He called it "the art of association." And in understanding it, he saw exactly how it could be lost.Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 18
Your mom runs the most efficient planned economy in the world.

She knows who hates onions, who needs new shoes, when the pipes need fixing. Central planning works perfectly at five people.

So why has the same logic killed millions when scaled up? 🧵 Image
Think about what she actually knows. Your schedule. What broke last Tuesday. How much money is left before payday. This knowledge is intimate, local, and constantly updated.

She doesn't need a committee to decide dinner. She just knows. Image
Now scale that to 100 million people. Who eats what. Which factory should run tonight. Which hospital needs more nurses tomorrow.

No central authority can hold that information. No computer can process it in time. The knowledge doesn't exist in one place. It never did. Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 16
A Soviet Prisoner Invented a 10-Second Test for Freedom

Natan Sharansky spent 9 years in a Gulag. When he got out, he had one question for every society he visited.

It takes 10 seconds to answer. And most Americans have never heard it. Image
The Town Square Test

Can you walk into the center of your city, say what you actually believe, and go home safely?

That's it. That's the whole test.

Sharansky called societies that pass it "free societies." He called those that fail it "fear societies."

Simple. Precise. Devastating in its implications.Image
But the Test Reveals Something Else Too

Sharansky designed it for authoritarian regimes. The answer there is obvious.

The uncomfortable question is what happens when you run it on a society that is technically free.

Because some people in free countries are starting to hesitate before they answer.Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 6
A New York Times reporter knew 10 million people were dying. He told the British Embassy. Then he went back to his typewriter and called the journalist covering the famine a liar.

That journalist was murdered two years later. The Times reporter kept his Pulitzer.

This is the story of four men who told the truth before it was allowed. 🧵Image
In 1933, Gareth Jones was 27 years old and working as a freelance journalist. He walked through Soviet Ukraine during the famine and reported exactly what he saw.

Walter Duranty, the New York Times' Moscow correspondent and Pulitzer Prize winner, responded in print. He called Jones a liar. Russians were "hungry, but not starving."

In private, Duranty told the British Embassy that as many as 10 million people had died.Image
Jones was banned from the Soviet Union. Two years later he was murdered in Mongolia under circumstances that point toward NKVD involvement.

He was 30 years old.

Duranty's Pulitzer still stands. The Times reviewed it in 2003 and decided not to revoke it. Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(