Students For Liberty Profile picture
Jun 2 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Karl Marx said he had discovered the scientific laws of economics.

Value came from labor.

Profit was theft.

Only central planning could build a just society.

But four Austrian economists—Menger, Böhm-Bawerk, Mises, and Hayek—tore his theory apart. 🧵 Image
Marx said value comes from labor.

Carl Menger said: value comes from us.

In Principles of Economics (1871), he showed that value is subjective. It depends on the preferences of individuals—changing across people, places, and time.

A violin is priceless to a musician, worthless to someone else. Food is worth more to the starving than to the full.

Labor doesn’t determine value.

Human needs do.Image
Marx said capitalists exploit workers.

Eugen Böhm-Bawerk introduced a different explanation: time preference.

Workers value present income. Capitalists provide that income now in exchange for uncertain profits later.

They take the risk, front the capital, and hope it pays off.

Profit is not exploitation. It’s compensation for time, risk, and planning.Image
But what if we abolished capitalism?

How would the state know what to produce?

Ludwig von Mises asked this in 1920—and proved socialism couldn’t answer it.

Without prices, there’s no way to compare costs or plan tradeoffs.

No real prices = no real economy.

He didn’t say socialism lacked morality.

He said it lacked logic.Image
F.A. Hayek went further.

He argued that no central planner could match the knowledge spread across society.

Prices aren’t just numbers. They’re signals—reflecting local needs, priorities, and scarcities.

Prices reflect that knowledge. They allow individuals to coordinate without any central planner needing to understand the full picture.

No expert, no algorithm, no five-year plan can replace that.Image
By the mid-20th century, Marxist economics had collapsed.

Menger refuted the labor theory of value.

Böhm-Bawerk dismantled surplus value.

Mises exposed the limits of planning.

Hayek explained why decentralization matters.

The Austrians didn’t just critique Marx. They offered a more coherent framework—rooted in individual choice, not class struggle.Image
So why does it matter now?

Because Marx’s bad ideas never die.

Price controls.

Central planning.

The constant vilification of profit.

Every time we forget what crushed Marxism, it crawls back—under new slogans, with old consequences. Image
Most students never learn this story.

They don’t know how Marx fell.

They don’t know why the Austrians won.

And they don’t realize how many of today’s bad ideas echo the same fallacies—just with friendlier branding. Image
Want to go deeper?

We made a short, free email course called How to Not Be an NPC on Tariffs.

Inside, you’ll learn:

– Why tariffs are about power, not just trade

– Who wins, who loses—and why

– What economists don’t say on cable news

– How these debates still shape our world

Start here → go.studentsforliberty.org/learn-tariffs/Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Aug 27
This book written by Ludwig von Mises in 1944 may be the most important thing to understand the threat we are facing in 2025.

"Omnipotent Government" predicted our current crisis 🧵Image
In the 1800s, the world experienced unprecedented peace and prosperity under classical liberalism.

Free trade connected nations. People moved freely across borders.

Then something shifted in the realm of ideas, and within decades, two world wars consumed civilization.Image
Mises wrote "Omnipotent Government" to answer a haunting question: How did the world go from the liberal 19th century to the totalitarian nightmare of the 20th?

His conclusion was radical: the path to Hitler began not with violence, but with ideas about the role of government.Image
Read 15 tweets
Aug 24
Trump imposed sweeping tariffs to "protect" American industry.

Meanwhile, 40 years ago, a small island nation did the exact opposite and became an economic powerhouse.

This is the story of New Zealand's farming revolution, and why protection breeds weakness. 🧵Image
In 1984, New Zealand faced a crisis.

The government was broke, spending more than it could afford, and agriculture—their economic backbone—was heavily subsidized.

Farmers received roughly one-third of their income from taxpayers. Sound familiar?Image
Unlike today's politicians who promise gradual reform "with transition periods," New Zealand went cold turkey.

They eliminated virtually all farm subsidies overnight. The agricultural lobby was furious.

Thousands of farmers protested in Wellington, literally releasing sheep on government property.Image
Read 12 tweets
Aug 23
Stop taking Karl Marx seriously.

He was completely refuted over a century ago by Austrian economists who dismantled every pillar of his theory.

Yet somehow, his ideas still haunt lecture halls and political debates like intellectual zombies.

Here's how four economists buried Marxism forever. 🧵Image
The destruction began in 1871 with Carl Menger and a simple question: where does value really come from?

Marx said labor creates value. Eight hours of work equals eight hours of worth.

Menger said: wrong. Value lives in human minds, not in objects or hours worked.Image
Think about it this way. Your first slice of pizza when you're starving? Priceless. Your fifth slice when you're stuffed? You'd pay someone to take it away.

Same labor went into both slices. Completely different value to you.

This is marginal utility—and it shattered Marx's foundation.Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 22
In 1990, a Black Democratic legislator who ran Jesse Jackson's campaigns twice implemented Milton Friedman's free-market education ideas.

This is how liberty can win through unlikely alliances. 🧵 Image
Meet Polly Williams and Milton Friedman. On paper, they had nothing in common.

Friedman: Nobel Prize-winning economist, architect of free-market theory.

Williams: Former welfare recipient, inner-city Milwaukee representative, civil rights activist.

Yet together, they revolutionized American education.Image
Image
In 1955, Friedman published "The Role of Government in Education," arguing that parents should control education dollars through vouchers.

Competition would improve schools, he claimed. But for 35 years, it remained academic theory.

Williams would make it reality, though for completely different reasons.Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 20
Imagine being so beloved that working-class families hung your portrait in their homes. Not because you were a celebrity, but because you actually cut their taxes and fought for their freedom.

Meet William Ewart Gladstone: history's most popular classical liberal 🧵Image
This wasn't some academic theorist or ivory tower philosopher.

Gladstone was a four-time Prime Minister who dominated British politics for over half a century.

And here's what made him different: he made liberty cool, moral, and undeniably popular.Image
Picture this: Gladstone didn't just talk about free trade. He abolished over 1,000 tariffs. That's 95% of Britain's protectionist policies, gone.

He didn't just critique big government. He slashed the income tax from 10% to 1.25%. And he wasn't satisfied until he could eliminate it entirely.Image
Read 10 tweets
Aug 19
Brilliant economists are saying Hayek was right about the past, but AI changes the game.

"The calculation problem? Solved. Modern supercomputers can handle what Soviet planners couldn't."

Here's why even smart people are missing something fundamental. 🧵Image
This isn't new thinking. It's the return of an ancient conceit.

Soviet planners once believed they could organize society "scientifically." No more waste, no unemployment, just rational experts allocating resources perfectly.

They called it scientific socialism. We know how that ended.Image
What these AI evangelists miss is what Friedrich Hayek understood decades ago: the problem was never computational power.

The problem is information itself.

When the price of tin rises, you don't need to know why. You just need to know that tin is now more valuable elsewhere.Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(