Students For Liberty Profile picture
Jun 2 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Karl Marx said he had discovered the scientific laws of economics.

Value came from labor.

Profit was theft.

Only central planning could build a just society.

But four Austrian economists—Menger, Böhm-Bawerk, Mises, and Hayek—tore his theory apart. 🧵 Image
Marx said value comes from labor.

Carl Menger said: value comes from us.

In Principles of Economics (1871), he showed that value is subjective. It depends on the preferences of individuals—changing across people, places, and time.

A violin is priceless to a musician, worthless to someone else. Food is worth more to the starving than to the full.

Labor doesn’t determine value.

Human needs do.Image
Marx said capitalists exploit workers.

Eugen Böhm-Bawerk introduced a different explanation: time preference.

Workers value present income. Capitalists provide that income now in exchange for uncertain profits later.

They take the risk, front the capital, and hope it pays off.

Profit is not exploitation. It’s compensation for time, risk, and planning.Image
But what if we abolished capitalism?

How would the state know what to produce?

Ludwig von Mises asked this in 1920—and proved socialism couldn’t answer it.

Without prices, there’s no way to compare costs or plan tradeoffs.

No real prices = no real economy.

He didn’t say socialism lacked morality.

He said it lacked logic.Image
F.A. Hayek went further.

He argued that no central planner could match the knowledge spread across society.

Prices aren’t just numbers. They’re signals—reflecting local needs, priorities, and scarcities.

Prices reflect that knowledge. They allow individuals to coordinate without any central planner needing to understand the full picture.

No expert, no algorithm, no five-year plan can replace that.Image
By the mid-20th century, Marxist economics had collapsed.

Menger refuted the labor theory of value.

Böhm-Bawerk dismantled surplus value.

Mises exposed the limits of planning.

Hayek explained why decentralization matters.

The Austrians didn’t just critique Marx. They offered a more coherent framework—rooted in individual choice, not class struggle.Image
So why does it matter now?

Because Marx’s bad ideas never die.

Price controls.

Central planning.

The constant vilification of profit.

Every time we forget what crushed Marxism, it crawls back—under new slogans, with old consequences. Image
Most students never learn this story.

They don’t know how Marx fell.

They don’t know why the Austrians won.

And they don’t realize how many of today’s bad ideas echo the same fallacies—just with friendlier branding. Image
Want to go deeper?

We made a short, free email course called How to Not Be an NPC on Tariffs.

Inside, you’ll learn:

– Why tariffs are about power, not just trade

– Who wins, who loses—and why

– What economists don’t say on cable news

– How these debates still shape our world

Start here → go.studentsforliberty.org/learn-tariffs/Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

Dec 12
In 1968, historian Robert Conquest published research showing Stalin killed millions.

Western intellectuals called him a propagandist. A Cold War hack. A CIA plant.

Then the USSR collapsed. The archives opened.

And every number he predicted was proven correct; or too conservative. 🧵Image
The 1960s had a serious Soviet problem.

While Conquest documented mass murder in Ukraine and the Gulag, Harvard professors praised Stalin's industrialization. British intellectuals visited Moscow and declared the future had arrived.

Anyone questioning this got dismissed as a reactionary.Image
One British historian refused to look away.

Robert Conquest spent the 1960s piecing together evidence from refugee testimonies, leaked documents, and demographic data that didn't add up.

His 1968 book "The Great Terror" documented Stalin's purges with precision. Image
Read 14 tweets
Dec 11
China tried capitalism as an experiment in four cities.

It worked so well they're still pretending to be communist.

But this "accident" keeps happening everywhere. And almost nobody talks about why. 🧵 Image
You've been told capitalism needs heavy regulation to work. That developing countries need government intervention to industrialize.

But across the world, governments created small zones with one key feature: dramatically fewer regulations, lower taxes, and actual property rights.Image
These "Special Economic Zones" did what wasn't supposed to be possible.

They attracted massive investment. Created millions of jobs. Turbocharged economic growth.

Not through aid. Not through subsidies. Through capitalism.

And the pattern repeats on every continent. Image
Read 10 tweets
Nov 28
Three ideas everyone told you would help you are actually destroying your generation.

A social psychologist at NYU spent years studying why Gen Z has record anxiety and depression.

What he found will make you question everything about how you were raised. 🧵 Image
Jonathan Haidt analyzed campus culture, mental health data, and generational shifts.

His conclusion? Three "great untruths" are being taught to young Americans as wisdom.

But they're the opposite of wisdom. They're psychological poison. Image
Untruth #1: "What doesn't kill you makes you weaker"

You were taught to avoid discomfort at all costs. Trigger warnings. Safe spaces. Microaggression reporting.

The promise: protection from harm.

The reality: you never built resilience. And now ordinary challenges feel unbearable.Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 24
Javier Milei calls himself a "Borgesian Liberal."

The man who inspired Argentina's new president? Jorge Luis Borges, the greatest writer in Spanish since Cervantes.

And the Nobel committee blacklisted him for 20+ years because he believed individuals matter more than collectives. 🧵Image
While Pablo Neruda (communist) won the Nobel in 1971 and Gabriel García Márquez (Fidel Castro's personal friend) won in 1982, Borges was denied for two decades.

His crime? Defending individual liberty with philosophical depth that rivals Friedrich Hayek. Image
Like Hayek, Borges understood human fallibility.

He was skeptical about free will, yet insisted: "If they tell me that at this moment I cannot act freely, I will despair."

We must act as free individuals precisely because we cannot know all that determines us. Image
Read 23 tweets
Nov 20
Argentina's 1853 Constitution declared property "inviolable." It guaranteed rivers open to all ships, banned protectionism, copied America's federal system, and even improved on it.

For 80 years, this worked perfectly.

Then one Supreme Court decision destroyed everything. 🧵 Image
Here's the part nobody teaches: Argentina didn't stumble into prosperity.

After decades of civil war, the founders in 1853 made a deliberate choice. They looked at the United States and asked: Why reinvent the wheel?

They copied the Constitution almost word for word, but improved it by learning from America's mistakes.Image
When General Rosas had closed Argentina's rivers to punish provinces that defied him, it strangled the economy. So the 1853 Constitution made it explicit: Rivers stay open. No exceptions.

They were building a machine for wealth creation, and the results came fast. Image
Read 18 tweets
Nov 18
Jean-Paul Sartre invented a verbal trick that killed millions.

He took the word "violence" and redefined it.

The existing social order? That was violence. Institutions? Violence. Property? Violence.

Once everything is violence, killing to overthrow it becomes self-defense. Here's how one philosopher's language game produced genocide. 🧵Image
Sartre was the most celebrated intellectual of the 20th century.

Existentialism. Freedom. Authenticity.

Every philosophy department teaches his work as liberation thought.

But they skip over what happened when his ideas left the seminar room and entered the killing fields. Image
Sartre's innovation was linguistic genius turned deadly.

He borrowed from German philosophy the concept of "institutionalized violence."

If society itself is violence, then revolutionary counter-violence isn't aggression. It's justice. It's self-defense. It's purification.

The system is the real murderer. You're just responding.Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(