Students For Liberty Profile picture
Jun 2 9 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Karl Marx said he had discovered the scientific laws of economics.

Value came from labor.

Profit was theft.

Only central planning could build a just society.

But four Austrian economists—Menger, Böhm-Bawerk, Mises, and Hayek—tore his theory apart. 🧵 Image
Marx said value comes from labor.

Carl Menger said: value comes from us.

In Principles of Economics (1871), he showed that value is subjective. It depends on the preferences of individuals—changing across people, places, and time.

A violin is priceless to a musician, worthless to someone else. Food is worth more to the starving than to the full.

Labor doesn’t determine value.

Human needs do.Image
Marx said capitalists exploit workers.

Eugen Böhm-Bawerk introduced a different explanation: time preference.

Workers value present income. Capitalists provide that income now in exchange for uncertain profits later.

They take the risk, front the capital, and hope it pays off.

Profit is not exploitation. It’s compensation for time, risk, and planning.Image
But what if we abolished capitalism?

How would the state know what to produce?

Ludwig von Mises asked this in 1920—and proved socialism couldn’t answer it.

Without prices, there’s no way to compare costs or plan tradeoffs.

No real prices = no real economy.

He didn’t say socialism lacked morality.

He said it lacked logic.Image
F.A. Hayek went further.

He argued that no central planner could match the knowledge spread across society.

Prices aren’t just numbers. They’re signals—reflecting local needs, priorities, and scarcities.

Prices reflect that knowledge. They allow individuals to coordinate without any central planner needing to understand the full picture.

No expert, no algorithm, no five-year plan can replace that.Image
By the mid-20th century, Marxist economics had collapsed.

Menger refuted the labor theory of value.

Böhm-Bawerk dismantled surplus value.

Mises exposed the limits of planning.

Hayek explained why decentralization matters.

The Austrians didn’t just critique Marx. They offered a more coherent framework—rooted in individual choice, not class struggle.Image
So why does it matter now?

Because Marx’s bad ideas never die.

Price controls.

Central planning.

The constant vilification of profit.

Every time we forget what crushed Marxism, it crawls back—under new slogans, with old consequences. Image
Most students never learn this story.

They don’t know how Marx fell.

They don’t know why the Austrians won.

And they don’t realize how many of today’s bad ideas echo the same fallacies—just with friendlier branding. Image
Want to go deeper?

We made a short, free email course called How to Not Be an NPC on Tariffs.

Inside, you’ll learn:

– Why tariffs are about power, not just trade

– Who wins, who loses—and why

– What economists don’t say on cable news

– How these debates still shape our world

Start here → go.studentsforliberty.org/learn-tariffs/Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Students For Liberty

Students For Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sfliberty

May 28
Thomas Sowell has more insight than most tenured professors.

That’s not hyperbole—it’s the real reason the academic establishment pretends he doesn’t exist.

They don’t refute him.

They exclude him.

Here are 5 Sowell ideas they hope you never read 🧵 Image
Sowell isn’t interested in political theater.

He doesn’t appeal to emotion, identity, or tribe.

He asks a simple but dangerous question:

What happens when we try this in the real world?

That’s why his work remains threatening—because it still holds up. Image
Visions shape everything.

📘 A Conflict of Visions, The Vision of the Anointed, The Quest for Cosmic Justice

Every ideological divide is rooted in a deeper conflict: how we view human nature.

The unconstrained vision believes we can solve problems with enough will and reason.

The constrained vision sees human limitations as permanent—so we build systems to deal with them, not deny them.

Bad policy begins with the belief that trade-offs can be avoided.

Sowell reminds us: “There are no solutions. There are only trade-offs.”Image
Read 10 tweets
May 26
The Soviets didn’t just conquer Poland with tanks.

They conquered it with envy.

Here’s how socialism uses resentment—not just repression—to dominate entire societies 🧵 Image
After WWII, the USSR took control of Poland.

Everyone knows they used force.

Fewer know what came next.

The Soviets needed more than violence to control a proud, educated people.

So they weaponized something older than ideology:

Envy. Image
Historian Stephen Kotkin explains:

The NKVD (Soviet secret police) began purging anyone “too independent.”

If you were ambitious, self-reliant, or respected in your community—you were arrested, deported, or worse.

But it wasn’t enough.

People still resisted. Quietly. Culturally.Image
Read 8 tweets
May 23
In the name of “the people,” socialist regimes have spent decades silencing anyone who didn’t fit their mold.

And few groups have suffered more under their rule than LGBT individuals.

Here’s why communism fears them—and why liberty protects them 🧵 Image
In 2023, China cracked down on LGBT groups.

Dozens of WeChat accounts—used to organize, educate, and advocate—were deleted overnight. No notice. No process.

Just silence.

Because under communism, you don’t get to define yourself.

The Party defines everything. Image
And this isn’t just China.

📍 Soviet Union: homosexuality = “bourgeois deviation.” Up to 5 years of forced labor in a gulag.

📍 Cuba: thousands sent to labor camps for “antisocial behavior.” Being gay was enough.

📍 Venezuela: recently, 33 men were arrested in a gay sauna. Their photos? Leaked to the press.Image
Read 10 tweets
May 9
You’ve been taught to hate profit.

But profit isn’t greed.

It’s the most honest feedback system ever created.

Here’s why markets can’t work without it 🧵 Image
Even defenders of capitalism often treat profit as a perk—

A bonus for entrepreneurs who took risks.

But that’s not it.

Profit is a signal.

A powerful form of communication.

Without it, no one knows what to do. Image
Profit means one thing:

You’re creating value.

It tells producers:

“People want more of this. Keep going.”

Without that signal, markets wouldn’t know:

What to make

How much to make

When to stop

Profit keeps the system coordinated. Image
Read 9 tweets
May 7
The Pope who lit the fire that helped burn down the Soviet empire.

A story about courage under totalitarianism—and how one man’s refusal to kneel changed history. 🧵Image
Karol Wojtyla, later known as John Paul II, grew up under two tyrannies:

First the Nazis. Then the communists.

He wasn’t a politician.

He wasn’t a soldier.

He fought with culture. With ideas. With faith that wouldn’t break.Image
By the age of 20, Wojtyla had lost every member of his family.

Most of his friends were either murdered or imprisoned.

So what did he do?

He started writing plays. Studying philosophy. Secretly training to be a priest—risking death every day.Image
Read 11 tweets
Apr 30
Most people think liberty needs to be justified.

Robert Nozick flipped the script: Power does.

Here’s how a Harvard-trained socialist tried to debunk libertarianism—and became one of its strongest defenders 🧵Image
Image
In the 1960s, Nozick was everything the academic world admired:

— Columbia-educated
— Harvard professor
— Proud socialist

He believed in redistribution, social justice, and the state.

Until one question got stuck in his mind:

What if libertarians weren’t just selfish—but right?Image
He didn’t grow up libertarian.

Didn’t read Rand. Didn’t quote Mises.

But unlike many of his peers, Nozick didn’t want to win arguments by slogans.

He wanted to understand his opponents—to beat them.

So he started reading libertarian thinkers.

It didn’t go how he expected.Image
Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(