Study Finds Left-Wing Governments Inhibit Innovation, While Right-Wing Rule Spurs It — Based on Data from 110 Countries (1995–2015):
“Overall, the empirical results show that a leftist ruling party inhibits the progress of technical innovation, whereas a right-wing ruling party promotes the appearance of new technology.”
Documenting the White replacement in as many Western countries as possible using the latest data. There is not going to be any commentary, or analysis. Just raw data that you can use at your advantage. All sources are provided at the end (1/10🧵)
USA 2020 Census data (general population + newborns)
🧃Just how JEWISH is the Epstein's client list? (1/3🧵)
(I made a detailed breakdown of famous Jeffrey Epstein's guests broken by ethnicity and occupation)
✡️Jews made up 5 out of 7 of the famous businessmen on the list
✡️Jews made up 2 out of 4 of the famous intellectuals on the list
✡️Jews made up 0 out of 10 of the famous actors and film directors on the list
The other 5 Jews were mostly in politics, sex-trafficking and among celebrities.
Powerful people with money and influence, but also a good amount of actors, celebrities' and sex traffickers comprised Epstein's list. I was unable to identify the occupation and ethnicity for the vast majority of guests due to them being unknown, but generally the White-Jewish proportions remain the same but a little lower. That is the methodology:
Contrary to the popular belief of Jews mainstreaming Anti-Hereditarian research people with Jewish ancestry were found to be behind 37% of the most acclaimed Hereditarian books on Race and IQ.
There is a notion on the Dissident Right that Jewish influence in the "Race and IQ" debate has been disproportionately leftist. 30% Jewish UN's statement of race is often broad up in support.
@KirkegaardEmil's recent data which I have used challenges that assertion.
The top 5 Hereditarian books on intelligence contained at least one author of Jewish descent (5/6) in 100% of the cases, while less prominent Hereditarian books were primarily written by Gentile authors. This is consistent with a higher verbal tilt model.
Since I’m now officially unlocked from Twitter I will be releasing a thread about the recent drama with DoA. However, it will not be more drama, but a sensible analysis of the situation in which I was found to be factually wrong on one thing and morally wrong on the other. 🧵
Funny enough, this recent drama was not caused by me. Apparently DoA had a little argument with an internet user by the name of “Mars”, who mentioned that in his private group in which I am a member of, some other guy leaked a porn photo of DoA (which we now know not be her).
Learning that, she made a libelous or perhaps an overreacting claim that I am a BBC fetishist who makes porn with her photos from HNH in White extinction groups. This is absolutely not only false but also a lie. I did not do that, and she has 0 evidence to support her claim.
Groypers/Nick Fuentes as the new leader of the Dissident Right (a professional thread🧵)
1. The term "Dissident Right" refers to a collection of beliefs on the right which are not acknowledged by the mainstream right because of their radical nature. It is therefore a broad umbrella which encompasses: Fascism, Groyperism, the Alt Right and the NRx.
2. In the modern times, Dissident Right politics finds itself being mainstreamed either through a perpetual normalization of itself or because mainstream rightist forces borrow a concept or an idea from the Dissident Right, such as: "Anarcho-Tyranny, Replacement or The Cathedral"