how can yield be amplified in a way thats not a ponzu?
turns out it can be done by borrowing an old concept from tradfi called fractional reserve banking
modern banking relies heavily on fractional reserve systems, where banks hold only a portion of customer deposits as reserves and lend out the rest to generate returns
the core function of a bank is to manage risk appropriately when allocating these deposits and always hold enough liquid assets to honour withdrawals
what if you could re-build banking on-chain and make it safer + produce a new type of (higher) yield as a result?
i'll explain how but quick primer on InfiniFi first
just like a bank InfiniFi deploys some assets into liquid DeFi farms and others into longer duration farms
• Liquid farms → Farms that provide instant access to the principal value
e.g $aUSDC in Aave, $fUSDC in Fluid etc.
• Illiquid farms → Farms that provide delayed access to the principal value
Example: Pendle PT's, Ethena $sUSDe, Aave's new $saUSDC (junior)
and lastly, just like with a bank, users can express their liquidity preferences when depositing into InfiniFi
in retail banking the way people express this preference is by depositing into their checking account (liquid but low to no yield) or their savings account (illiquid but higher yield)
in InfiniFi users express this by deciding to *stake* or *lock* their tokens and based on their choice they receive different receipt tokens
$iUSD = IOU representing a claim of 1 dollar in the system
$siUSD = interest-bearing and provides exposure to the liquid returns generated by the protocol
$liUSD-xw = locked for x weeks where x can be chosen by users but importantly, provides exposure to the yield from longer duration assets in the system
ok great the protocol has a way of knowing users liquidity preferences and manage asset allocation accordingly but what is the benefit for users - how does it amplify yields?
let's say InfiniFi has received 1000 USDC in liquid deposits and 500 USDC in illiquid deposits by users
the naive approach would be to allocate funds accordingly i.e 1000 into liquid at 5% and 500 into illiquid at 10% rate
this achieves nothing new
the liquid depositors could deposit into Fluid directly
and the illiquid depositors could deposit into Pendle PT directly
if however, using fractional reserve banking principles InfiniFi would deploy a portion of liquid deposits into higher-yielding illiquid deposits - say only 20%
yields for both group of depositors would be significantly amplified (see image)
so this achieves overall higher yield which can be split among both group of depositors while not adding new protocol risk and maintaining liquidity
is there any downside?
the only downside occurs is if all 100% of liquid depositors want to withdraw at the same time given a portion was allocated into the illiquid bucket
the money wouldn't be gone but liquid depositors would have to wait until the system frees up capital
the good thing is that this risk is inversely proportional to TVL growth, meaning that as more capital enters, the system becomes more resilient.
Like in TradFi the biggest banks never face liquidity issues.
i think InfiniFi comes at a perfect time where stablecoins and RWA's are coming on-chain at increasing speed
as a capital allocator and yield amplification machine it can play a crucial role in the future of DeFi.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
why we moved away from being an aggregator and turned @BungeeExchange into an open marketplace
and why this is the winning approach 👇
being an aggregator of DEX's, bridges and chains in 2025 is an impossible task
every integration takes time, costs human capital and annoyingly also increases the contract surface attack of your protocol
because you and other aggregators will fail at having *everything* aggregated you end up being wrapped by a meta-aggregator
around a year ago we shifted our thinking and thought what if we turn bungee into an open marketplace?
like amazon which started as an aggregator of book suppliers and started its astronomical rise once it opened up its marketplace to all kinds of sellers and every good on the planet
Story time: How we disrupted our multi-billion dollar bridge aggregation protocol to build something much bigger and better.
The year is 2023. I had just joined Socket and believed we were sitting on a massive defensible business, ready to TGE any moment.
Bungee was the the no. 1 bridge aggregator, doing billions in volumes, integrated in virtually every major crypto wallet from @coinbase to Rainbow and Metamask.
Smooth sailing.
Turns out I was wrong.
While we were clearly servicing a real need, we were missing an essential piece.
The foundation we were building on wasn’t scalable, nor did it ultimately provide users the UX we were striving for.
Let me explain 👇
The most common user need in crypto is a token swap. Swaps are simple.
Swap $USDC for $ETH.
In a multichain context that’s: swap $USDC on Chain A for $ETH on Chain B.
Most crypto assets suck. From the thousands that are listed on @coingecko there’s max 50 that I would invest in.
Close to none generate reliable cashflows & the few that do are highly correlated to the crypto market's overall success.
We need to connect crypto to the real world
What the last few years of on-chain gambling have shown is that blockchains are incredibly powerful machines to track and exchange assets at global scale.
It’s hard to quantify these things but probably an order of magnitude more efficient than the patchwork of siloed databases
.. & excel sheets that make the international financial system turn today.
You can see these massive efficiency gains at play with stablecoins, the first tokenized real world asset gaining adoption on-chain.
2) report to eth-phishing-detect (this will make wallets display warnings when they visit the phishing site): github.com/MetaMask/eth-p…
that only prevents other users from getting scammed though
the affected user has almost no chance to get their funds back but a good advice is to involve law enforcement and contact the domain registrar to ask for the domain owners ID