Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
@kikas6652
Jun 4, 2025 • 32 tweets • 13 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
🧵 @piersmorgan in his latest circus between comedian @ComicDaveSmith & @HausdorffMedia was a staggering display of contempt & disrespect for the woman he invited to his show. Piers even sneered that “numbers aren’t her strong point,” a cheap, sexist jab suggesting she’s stupid. Image
Piers insists his shift on Israel isn’t due to pressure Numbers “aren’t his strong point,” just like honesty. Tucker Carlson says Piers once told him he “hated Israel with every fiber of his body.” That would explains everything.
Image
Since numbers “aren’t Piers’ thing,” here’s some help: he interrupted @HausdorffMedia 103 times—her longest stretch was 38 seconds. @ComicDaveSmith? Uninterrupted for more than 3 minutes. Piers cut in 3 times How do you like those numbers, Piers? Image
Piers Morgan has relentlessly pushed the same false narrative that Israel is starving Gazans or attacking civilians on their way to get food. Let’s start with the most basic & shameless lie. Israel is not targeting civilians & that’s not an opinion—it’s documented fact. Image
Hamas itself has admitted to executing people. There’s drone & CCTV footage as evidence, even the BBC & The Washington Post retracted their reporting. Yet, Piers Morgan still claims “there is no evidence.” That’s not ignorance—it’s deliberate deception.
As for “starvation,” Natasha clearly explaining that six to eight months’ worth of food had entered Gaza during the last ceasefire. He brushed it off because it doesn’t fit his story. But this is the story: Gaza has more calories per capita than Norway
But the real story, billions in cash aid—primarily UK taxpayer money—are flowing into Gaza, not to feed civilians, but to finance Hamas, a fact exposed by NGO Monitor weeks ago. Food is available, but it’s stolen and resold at absurd prices. Image
If Piers were a real journalist, he’d be reporting on the UN’s & UK’s complicity in financing terrorism, not misleading his audience. As a British citizen, he should be demanding why the UK is one of the largest financiers of Hamas’s extortion economy
There’s no famine in Gaza. No deaths from starvation. Restaurants are open, markets are busy. Meanwhile, UNICEF warns 3.2 million kids under five face acute malnutrition in Sudan and a 1,000% rise in violence against kids. So, Piers—where’s the genocide? Image
Piers Morgan theatrically demands Israel count the children it “kills,” implying intent or indifference—yet no military, including his own country’s, tracks child casualties separately in war. Why hold Israel to a standard no army meets? What exactly is he performing—& for whom? Image
The British military doesn’t record or estimate civilian deaths from its operations—a fact confirmed by a 2021 FOI response. As of 2024, the UK still has no unit dedicated to investigating civilian harm. The RAF even refused to disclose how many people it killed in Yemen Image
Image
The U.S. Department of Defense has made some efforts to report civilian casualties—spurred by Obama’s 2016 executive order & the 2018 NDAA—but these reports, revoked under Trump, are widely seen as incomplete & consistently underestimate the real toll of U.S. operations. Image
Has anyone heard Piers Morgan demand answers about that? Has he ever asked a single British or U.S. official why they don’t know how many civilians they’ve killed? Of course not. Because this isn’t about standards—it’s about his obsessive crusade against Israel.
In Gaza, we can actually analyze death tolls. That’s how Natasha—& anyone who cares about facts—knows the civilian casualty ratio. It’s not rocket science. But either numbers really aren’t Piers’ strong point, or his hatred for Israel outweighs his interest in the truth. Image
Hamas claims 54,400 Gaza deaths; IDF says 30,000 are militants. That leaves ~24,400 civilians, Hamas includes natural deaths (~8,500). Adjusted ratio: 1.9 militants to 1 civilian—far better than the global wartime average of 9 civilians. So why is Piers Morgan outraged? Image
Piers doesn’t just ask about civilian deaths—he weaponizes it, turning it into a moral attack like “How many children have YOU killed?” But Natasha Hausdorff & the Israeli Ambassador are diplomats, not soldiers, and have killed zero children. Image
Hamas’s casualty lists include duplicates and old deaths (~15%). Among 50K reported, 72% aged 13–55 and 65% of teens were male—many likely fighters. IDF’s 30,000 fighters count teens too, making “how many children died” a complex question. Image
Palestinian sources show 67% are male, 33% female; 31% under 18, but less than 3% were infants—indicating many casualties were likely male combatants, not just “women and children.” The real story—Hamas sending children to fight. Piers won’t touch that—it ruins his narrative. Image
Piers Morgan claims Gaza’s population is uniquely “half children,” but many conflict zones like Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen also have 45–50% of their population under 18. A quick search would’ve shown that. Image
Nigeria, with 57% under 18, has the world’s youngest population—yet it’s also the deadliest place for Christians, with 63,000+ killed by jihadists. Piers Morgan has given this genocide zero airtime.
The claim of an “illegal occupation” and uproar over 22 new Israeli settlements ignores key facts. Experts like the ICJ Vice President and top international lawyers say there’s no illegal occupation. Natasha tried to explain this but was cut off 103 times.
No need for debate—the UN Charter itself, via Article 80, explicitly affirms Jewish rights between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean, no matter a future Palestinian state. Piers Morgan should learn this before spreading false claims
What Piers and much of the world are advocating for is nothing less than Hitler’s wet dream—a Judenrein (Jewish-free) land, this time, in the heart of the Jewish homeland. Shame on anyone who continues to support that agenda. Image
Piers claims Israel bans international media, but like any warzone, press access is controlled—not banned. I’m not a journalist and still get basic facts. Piers, Google it. If he wants to report from Gaza, he can apply & follow the same military protocols.
Piers, yes most “journalists” in Gaza are actually Hamas members or affiliates—a fact backed by undisputed evidence and even legal action. Both Al-Jazeera and the Associated Press are facing lawsuits for employing Hamas terrorists disguised as journalists Image
Just when you thought Piers Morgan couldn’t sink any lower, he closes his show by giving airtime to a literal Hamas member. This fact was brought to his attention by journalist @EFischberger, yet instead of addressing the concern, Piers blocked him.
@EFischberger So much for being a “big boy.” Blocking a journalist for simply raising a red flag about your guest isn’t just cowardly—it’s a blatant admission of zero journalistic integrity. Image
Piers either knowingly or negligently booked a Hamas-linked guest tied to a terrorist group. If knowingly, that’s not just unethical—it risks illegal material support under UK & US counterterrorism laws. Journalism has limits; aiding terror propaganda crosses & destroys that line Image
During his friendly chat with his new Hamas-affiliated guest, Piers Morgan confidently claimed ‘he knows history’ and that Israel was created ‘because of the Holocaust’—a statement that’s not just historically false, it’s blatant Hamas-style propaganda. Image
Piers tried to pretend there’s no connection between the nonstop lies told about Israel and the global surge in violence against Jews—but reality tells a different story. The UN lies, Israelis are murdered in D.C.
Hamas propaganda repeated worldwide, Jews are burned alive Image
Image
@ScottHayes11b, a pro-Israel American, was violently attacked in Massachusetts by a Hamas-supporter quoting the same false 180,000 death toll pushed by The Lancet. If that’s not a clear link between misinformation & real violence, what is?
Debunking Piers Morgan’s lies is embarrassingly simple—basic research and Hamas’s own statements dismantle his narrative. Yet facts don’t matter in his version of journalism. Inviting a Hamas member on his show is the lowest point so far
More on Substack: globaldisconnect.substack.com/p/piers-morgan…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Leslie Kajomovitz

Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kikas6652

Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Jan 31
🧵Every few years, Europe "rediscovers" the same idea: two-speed Europe, multi-speed Europe, variable geometry. The terminology changes, but the premise remains the same — some EU states should integrate deeper and faster, while others are pushed to "second class" States. Image
Two-speed Europe” is the idea that the EU should formally accept unequal integration. A core group would advance deeper integration, while others are left out—bound by Brussels’ rules but excluded from decision-making. Sold as flexibility, turns an informal imbalance into a permanent hierarchyImage
What’s new isn’t the idea, but the confidence behind it. Germany has revived it openly, France backs it, others quietly agree. Sold as realism, it dodges the truth: the problem isn’t tiers, it’s the EU itself. Multi-speed Europe isn’t reform—it’s an admission of failure. Image
Read 7 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Jan 21
🧵Almost no one is asking the most important question about Trump’s “Board of Peace”: Is it even constitutional? Here’s why Trump’s “Board of Peace” raises serious constitutional issues that no one is talking about. Image
“Minilateralism,” Non-Binding Commitments, and Why Labels Do Not End the Treaty Inquiry

Some describe the Board as a form of executive “minilateralism,” akin to informal contact groups created without Senate ratification.

The problem, U.S. constitutional law turns on substance, not labels. The Charter does not describe a temporary forum; it creates an enduring institution with legal personality—meaning the capacity to act as an independent legal entity under international law.

Legal personality is decisive because it transforms a diplomatic gathering into a standing organization capable of: Owning property, Entering contracts, Suing and being sued, Acting independently of its member states

Under U.S. law, such status cannot be self-declared. It requires either congressional authorization or designation under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA). The Board satisfies neither. As a result, its claimed legal personality has no domestic legal grounding, even as the United States becomes politically and institutionally bound by creating, staffing, and chairing it.

“Non-binding” does not mean constitutionally irrelevant. As Medellín v. Texas makes clear, obligations may be non-self-executing in U.S. courts yet still bind the United States politically and diplomatically.

Expiration clauses do not cure this problem when renewal authority rests solely with the Chairman, enabling conditional perpetuity outside democratic oversight.Image
Immunities, Domestic Law, and the Limits of Executive Authority

The Charter goes further by asserting that the Board itself shall “ensure” privileges and immunities through agreements negotiated by its own officials. While defenders argue this merely contemplates host-state agreements subject to domestic law, the post explains that this misunderstands how immunity works in the United States.

Under U.S. law, immunity is derivative, not inherent. It can arise only through: Congressional authorization (via statute or treaty), or Presidential designation under the IOIA, which itself presupposes lawful U.S. participation

An organization created unilaterally by the President cannot bootstrap itself into immunity. Executive agreements cannot displace Congress’s control over jurisdiction, courts, liability, or regulatory enforcement. Even if no immunity is ultimately granted, the constitutional problem arises from constructing a framework that treats immunity as an expected institutional attribute, negotiated by executive authority and potentially administered by a self-perpetuating Chairman.

Invocations of UN practice or Security Council resolutions do not resolve this. UN immunities in the U.S. exist because Congress enacted implementing statutes. International endorsement cannot override domestic separation of powers.Image
Read 14 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 26, 2025
🧵Thanksgiving wasn’t born in a peaceful colonial feast—it was created by Lincoln in 1863 as a wartime ritual to hold a fractured nation together. Today’s polarized America faces its own internal divide and foreign adversaries eager to exploit it. The holiday’s lesson is clear: unity is national security and the only way to save a divided nation.Image
The myth most people imagine Thanksgiving as a colonial harvest ritual. But the holiday we celebrate today—this national pause for unity—was invented during the Civil War. Yes, Plymouth had a 1621 meal, but it wasn’t called Thanksgiving, wasn’t a tradition and it wasn't repeated.Image
The first real national Thanksgiving was proclaimed on November 26, 1863, in the middle of the Civil War. Lincoln issued it four months after Gettysburg, as the Union was still burying its dead. Thanksgiving wasn’t born from abundance. It was born from national desperation. Image
Read 11 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 20, 2025
🧵Israel is passing a new law to “cut water & electricity” to UNRWA. This amendment enforces the 2024 law banning UNRWA from operating in East Jerusalem, clarifying that utilities to its offices—which the agency refuses to close—count as prohibited contact. Image
If you read the headlines about the Knesset voting to cut water and electricity to UNRWA, you would think Israel suddenly woke up one morning and passed new “draconian” legislation targeting the UN agency. In reality, that narrative is not just misleading—it is factually wrong. Image
This isn’t about cutting water or electricity to homes or refugee camps—those aren’t supplied by Israeli companies. The amendment targets UNRWA’s East Jerusalem offices, which the agency refused to vacate. It simply enforces the law. Image
Read 6 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 18, 2025
🧵Trump selling the F-3, the world’s most advanced stealth fighter to a regime that doesn’t even recognizes Israel’s existence is not only reckless, it’s potentially illegal. U.S. law requires any defense sale to the Middle East preserves Israel’s Qualitative Military Edge. (QME) Image
Since 2008, U.S. law has required presidents to ensure Israel keeps a clear military edge. Under the Arms Export Control Act, any Middle East arms sale must be certified as not harming Israel’s QME—a mandate reaffirmed in later defense laws. It isn’t custom. It’s statutory. Image
Even downgraded export F-35s alters the balance. QME law requires that no sale diminish Israel’s edge—and stealth can’t be partially exported. Once Saudi Arabia has the F-35, the gap collapses. Israel’s superiority is gone—precisely what the law forbids.
Read 7 tweets
Leslie Kajomovitz Profile picture
Nov 18, 2025
🧵Many believe only Security Council resolutions “under Chapter VII” are binding. That’s a myth. The UN Charter makes clear that legal force comes from the Council’s authority and the resolutions' operative language—not from magic words. Image
Article 25 of the Charter, obligates UN members to carry out Security Council decisions. Chapter VII adds enforcement tools like sanctions or force, but doesn’t limit the resolution's binding authority. Image
Operative verbs determine whether a UN Security Council resolution is binding: “Decides” & “Demands” bind states; “Calls upon,” “Urges,” “Recommends,” & “Welcomes” do not. Binding force comes from wording, not Chapter VII. Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(