🧵 @piersmorgan in his latest circus between comedian @ComicDaveSmith & @HausdorffMedia was a staggering display of contempt & disrespect for the woman he invited to his show. Piers even sneered that “numbers aren’t her strong point,” a cheap, sexist jab suggesting she’s stupid.
Piers insists his shift on Israel isn’t due to pressure Numbers “aren’t his strong point,” just like honesty. Tucker Carlson says Piers once told him he “hated Israel with every fiber of his body.” That would explains everything.
Since numbers “aren’t Piers’ thing,” here’s some help: he interrupted @HausdorffMedia 103 times—her longest stretch was 38 seconds. @ComicDaveSmith? Uninterrupted for more than 3 minutes. Piers cut in 3 times How do you like those numbers, Piers?
Piers Morgan has relentlessly pushed the same false narrative that Israel is starving Gazans or attacking civilians on their way to get food. Let’s start with the most basic & shameless lie. Israel is not targeting civilians & that’s not an opinion—it’s documented fact.
Hamas itself has admitted to executing people. There’s drone & CCTV footage as evidence, even the BBC & The Washington Post retracted their reporting. Yet, Piers Morgan still claims “there is no evidence.” That’s not ignorance—it’s deliberate deception.
As for “starvation,” Natasha clearly explaining that six to eight months’ worth of food had entered Gaza during the last ceasefire. He brushed it off because it doesn’t fit his story. But this is the story: Gaza has more calories per capita than Norway
But the real story, billions in cash aid—primarily UK taxpayer money—are flowing into Gaza, not to feed civilians, but to finance Hamas, a fact exposed by NGO Monitor weeks ago. Food is available, but it’s stolen and resold at absurd prices.
If Piers were a real journalist, he’d be reporting on the UN’s & UK’s complicity in financing terrorism, not misleading his audience. As a British citizen, he should be demanding why the UK is one of the largest financiers of Hamas’s extortion economy
There’s no famine in Gaza. No deaths from starvation. Restaurants are open, markets are busy. Meanwhile, UNICEF warns 3.2 million kids under five face acute malnutrition in Sudan and a 1,000% rise in violence against kids. So, Piers—where’s the genocide?
Piers Morgan theatrically demands Israel count the children it “kills,” implying intent or indifference—yet no military, including his own country’s, tracks child casualties separately in war. Why hold Israel to a standard no army meets? What exactly is he performing—& for whom?
The British military doesn’t record or estimate civilian deaths from its operations—a fact confirmed by a 2021 FOI response. As of 2024, the UK still has no unit dedicated to investigating civilian harm. The RAF even refused to disclose how many people it killed in Yemen
The U.S. Department of Defense has made some efforts to report civilian casualties—spurred by Obama’s 2016 executive order & the 2018 NDAA—but these reports, revoked under Trump, are widely seen as incomplete & consistently underestimate the real toll of U.S. operations.
Has anyone heard Piers Morgan demand answers about that? Has he ever asked a single British or U.S. official why they don’t know how many civilians they’ve killed? Of course not. Because this isn’t about standards—it’s about his obsessive crusade against Israel.
In Gaza, we can actually analyze death tolls. That’s how Natasha—& anyone who cares about facts—knows the civilian casualty ratio. It’s not rocket science. But either numbers really aren’t Piers’ strong point, or his hatred for Israel outweighs his interest in the truth.
Hamas claims 54,400 Gaza deaths; IDF says 30,000 are militants. That leaves ~24,400 civilians, Hamas includes natural deaths (~8,500). Adjusted ratio: 1.9 militants to 1 civilian—far better than the global wartime average of 9 civilians. So why is Piers Morgan outraged?
Piers doesn’t just ask about civilian deaths—he weaponizes it, turning it into a moral attack like “How many children have YOU killed?” But Natasha Hausdorff & the Israeli Ambassador are diplomats, not soldiers, and have killed zero children.
Hamas’s casualty lists include duplicates and old deaths (~15%). Among 50K reported, 72% aged 13–55 and 65% of teens were male—many likely fighters. IDF’s 30,000 fighters count teens too, making “how many children died” a complex question.
Palestinian sources show 67% are male, 33% female; 31% under 18, but less than 3% were infants—indicating many casualties were likely male combatants, not just “women and children.” The real story—Hamas sending children to fight. Piers won’t touch that—it ruins his narrative.
Piers Morgan claims Gaza’s population is uniquely “half children,” but many conflict zones like Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen also have 45–50% of their population under 18. A quick search would’ve shown that.
Nigeria, with 57% under 18, has the world’s youngest population—yet it’s also the deadliest place for Christians, with 63,000+ killed by jihadists. Piers Morgan has given this genocide zero airtime.
The claim of an “illegal occupation” and uproar over 22 new Israeli settlements ignores key facts. Experts like the ICJ Vice President and top international lawyers say there’s no illegal occupation. Natasha tried to explain this but was cut off 103 times.
No need for debate—the UN Charter itself, via Article 80, explicitly affirms Jewish rights between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean, no matter a future Palestinian state. Piers Morgan should learn this before spreading false claims
What Piers and much of the world are advocating for is nothing less than Hitler’s wet dream—a Judenrein (Jewish-free) land, this time, in the heart of the Jewish homeland. Shame on anyone who continues to support that agenda.
Piers claims Israel bans international media, but like any warzone, press access is controlled—not banned. I’m not a journalist and still get basic facts. Piers, Google it. If he wants to report from Gaza, he can apply & follow the same military protocols.
Piers, yes most “journalists” in Gaza are actually Hamas members or affiliates—a fact backed by undisputed evidence and even legal action. Both Al-Jazeera and the Associated Press are facing lawsuits for employing Hamas terrorists disguised as journalists
Just when you thought Piers Morgan couldn’t sink any lower, he closes his show by giving airtime to a literal Hamas member. This fact was brought to his attention by journalist @EFischberger, yet instead of addressing the concern, Piers blocked him.
@EFischberger So much for being a “big boy.” Blocking a journalist for simply raising a red flag about your guest isn’t just cowardly—it’s a blatant admission of zero journalistic integrity.
Piers either knowingly or negligently booked a Hamas-linked guest tied to a terrorist group. If knowingly, that’s not just unethical—it risks illegal material support under UK & US counterterrorism laws. Journalism has limits; aiding terror propaganda crosses & destroys that line
During his friendly chat with his new Hamas-affiliated guest, Piers Morgan confidently claimed ‘he knows history’ and that Israel was created ‘because of the Holocaust’—a statement that’s not just historically false, it’s blatant Hamas-style propaganda.
Piers tried to pretend there’s no connection between the nonstop lies told about Israel and the global surge in violence against Jews—but reality tells a different story. The UN lies, Israelis are murdered in D.C.
Hamas propaganda repeated worldwide, Jews are burned alive
@ScottHayes11b, a pro-Israel American, was violently attacked in Massachusetts by a Hamas-supporter quoting the same false 180,000 death toll pushed by The Lancet. If that’s not a clear link between misinformation & real violence, what is?
Debunking Piers Morgan’s lies is embarrassingly simple—basic research and Hamas’s own statements dismantle his narrative. Yet facts don’t matter in his version of journalism. Inviting a Hamas member on his show is the lowest point so far
More on Substack: globaldisconnect.substack.com/p/piers-morgan…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Jihad isn’t just an inner struggle. It's a religious mandate rooted in Islamic theology, historically used to justify centuries of violent conquest. Western academia has rebranded it—intentionally—stripping jihad of its supremacist and militaristic origins.
@DanBurmawy
The Quran commands warfare: 9:29 orders Muslims to fight non-believers until they submit & pay the jizya. 2:216 calls fighting obligatory. Hadiths echo this. Muhammad said, “Jihad is to be carried on till the Day of Resurrection” (Sahih Bukhari). This isn't metaphorical.
Islamic law codified jihad as both defensive and offensive warfare. Prominent scholars like Ibn Taymiyya & Al-Ghazali affirmed that conquest of non-Muslims was a duty. The four Sunni schools upheld this, with offensive jihad widely practiced across centuries.
🧵In this post, I’ll go through @piersmorgan latest substack post point by point, exposing the revisionism at work & unpacking how Piers Morgan is once again turning criticism into a self-serving performance. He’s not being silenced—he’s being fact-checked. He doesn’t like it.
After his disgraceful treatment of @HausdorffMedia and repeated misrepresentation of facts surrounding Gaza and Hamas, Morgan is now trying to reframe himself as the reasonable, misunderstood victim. Let’s be clear: it’s damage control.
Piers Morgan starts by pretending to grasp the horror of facing a genocidal enemy—he doesn’t. Then he claims Israel risks becoming guilty of the very terror it fights. That’s not moral clarity—it’s obscene, dishonest, and a grotesque distortion of reality.
🧵Remembering the Lod Airport Massacre: From Marxists in Tokyo to radicals in D.C., the faces have changed, but the mission hasn’t—murder for “Palestine.” The past didn’t die—it rebranded. Now it marches through campuses, trends on TikTok & loads weapons in D.C.
53 years ago today, 3 Japanese Marxists landed in Israel. Their violin cases hid assault rifles—not instruments. Minutes later, they opened fire at Lod Airport, killing 26, mostly Christians from Puerto Rico and wounding 80. It was a bloodbath
They weren’t Palestinian. They weren’t Arab. They weren’t Muslim. They didn’t scream “Allahu Akbar.” They were Japanese Marxists—clean-cut, calm, and armed to the teeth. Members of the Japanese Red Army, they had trained with the PFLP in Lebanon.
🧵UNICEF’s latest statement accusing Israel of a “ruthless war on children” is not just disgraceful – it is malicious, dangerous, and dripping with the oldest blood libel.
Let’s be crystal clear: UNICEF is not speaking for children. It is speaking for terrorists.
@HillelNeuer
UNICEF's so-called “statement” is full of lies & distortions. Truth clearly doesn’t matter – only narrative. And what is that narrative? The same one that has haunted Jews for centuries: the slanderous, vile lie that Jews kill children.
@HillelNeuer @EylonALevy @stateofapod
The UN’s al-Najjar report is riddled with lies. AI images, recycled photos, kids "killed" months ago, and zero verified evidence. IDF denies involvement, yet the UN parrots Hamas propaganda without question.
🧵War reporting is vital—but it’s not a free-for-all. Journalists don’t just show, flip on a camera, & start broadcasting. In every modern war access is controlled. But when it comes to Gaza, the media & journalists like @PiersUncensored suddenly pretend none of this applies.
Since October 2023, major media outlets and journalists have demanded that Israel allow unrestricted press access to one of the most dangerous war zones on earth. But that’s not how war reporting has ever worked.
Israel is no different. Reporters must be credentialed by the IDF and embedded through official channels to enter Gaza. Since October 7th, many have followed those procedures & gained access. But most have demanded special access far beyond what any modern military would allow.