Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture
Jun 5 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The West Believes Two Myths About Russia’s Revolution, And Both Are False

When it comes to 1917 and the Russian Civil War, most Westerners fall into one of two neat, comforting narratives.
But both collapse the moment you start looking at actual facts.

🧵👇Image
Myth 1: “The People Hated the Tsar”

This cliché is often used to justify the revolution: Nicholas II was overthrown by a united, angry population.
The truth?

🔸 Nicholas abdicated under pressure from his own generals (and elites) Alekseyev, Ruzsky, Brusilov, not because of a mass uprising.
🔸 The army was still intact. There was no large-scale mutiny, no battlefield collapse.
🔸 In rural areas, people didn’t even hear about the abdication for weeks, and when they did, many responded with confusion or grief.
🔸 Millions later fought and died under the banner of “Faith, Tsar, and Fatherland.” These weren’t nobles but they were peasants, Cossacks, front-line soldiers.
🔸 And after the brutal execution of the Tsar’s entire family, including children, even moderates turned against the Bolsheviks.
Panikhidas (memorial services) were held in villages across Russia.

📖: Nicholas II’s diaries, Alekseyev’s memoirs, White Army archives, peasant testimonies.
The Forgotten Fact: Monarchist Uprisings Swept Rural Russia

While modern narratives tell you “the people welcomed the revolution,” the reality is that from 1918 to 1922, monarchist and anti-Bolshevik peasant uprisings erupted across the country.

Examples:

🔻 Tambov Rebellion (1920–1921):
Peasants raised icons and portraits of the Tsar. One slogan: “Down with the commissars! Long live the people’s power!”

🔻 Chaplygin Uprising (1918):
In Lipetsk province, peasants killed the Bolshevik food detachment and raised a flag bearing the image of Nicholas II.

🔻 Altai and Siberian Uprisings (1919–1920):
Rebels called themselves “loyal subjects” and sang tsarist hymns.

🔻 “Green” rebels from Orel to Chernigov:
Independent partisans marched with icons, demanding the return of “true order.”

📖: Cheka reports, RCP(b) documents, Melgunov, Danilov, Soviet archival records.
Myth 2: “The Whites Were Noble Knights, and Stalin Erased Orthodoxy”

This is the favorite myth of Western conservatives and staunch anti-communists, the idea that the Whites were chivalrous Christian heroes, and Bolsheviks destroyed all of Russia’s tradition.
But here is the truth:

🔸 The White movement was fractured and internally divided: monarchists, liberals, moderate socialists.
🔸 Many collaborated openly with Western powers like Britain and France, undermining their support among the Russian people.
🔸 In the countryside, peasants distrusted the Whites, who talked of “order” but wouldn’t solve the land issue.
🔸 Atrocities were committed on both sides. The Civil War wasn’t a fairytale, it was a bloodbath.
🔸 Religious persecution began under Lenin, especially 1921–1923.
🔸 But under Stalin religious persecution eased in 1930s and in 1943 the Patriarchate was restored, seminaries reopened, churches rebuilt.

📖: White memoirs (Denikin, Wrangel), ROC archives, Red Army orders.
So What Was It Really About?

While you’re stuck debating tired clichés “the Tsar was bad,” “the Whites were good,” “Stalin was the devil”, you all miss the real point.

Worse…you miss how it all connects to today.

The 1917 Revolution wasn’t a domestic upheaval. It was a war between financial systems, between a rising continental model Russia and Germany and the maritime colonial model (UK + USA).

🔸 The Anglo-American axis won that round by weakening both Russia and Germany.
🔸 Their financial system dominated the 20th century, shaping global institutions, currencies, and empires.
🔸 But today, that system is eroding, and those who benefited most from it are desperately fighting to keep it alive.

That’s why they want you to believe in fairy tales about peasants who hated their Tsar and revolutions that brought “freedom.” Because if you ever truly understand what happened back then you’ll understand exactly what’s happening now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rina Lu🇷🇺

Rina Lu🇷🇺 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rinalu_

May 27
Prescott Bush, Auschwitz, and Silesia: The History You Don’t See in Schoolbooks

Whenever people talk about “financial ties to the Third Reich,” the spotlight somehow always skips over the West especially the American elite. But one of the clearest cases of real business collaboration with Nazi Germany involves none other than Prescott Bush, grandfather of U.S. President George W. Bush 🤫

🧵👇Image
In the 1930s, Prescott Bush was a director at Union Banking Corporation (UBC), a bank tied to German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, one of Hitler’s earliest and biggest financial backers.

UBC didn’t just handle money but actively channeled funds into Nazi-linked industries, including steel and manufacturing operations that played a direct role in preparing Germany for war.

In 1942, when the U.S. officially entered WWII, the U.S. government seized UBC’s assets under the Trading with the Enemy Act. Translation: They openly acknowledged that the bank was serving enemy interests.Image
UBC had business connections with the Consolidated Silesian Steel Corporation, located in Silesia a region of Czechoslovakia that had been annexed by Poland in 1938 (Munich Agreement), when Czechoslovakia was carved up with the blessing of the UK and France.

This region housed steel plants and ore mines, right near Auschwitz (Oswiecim). There’s overwhelming evidence that forced labor from the camps was used in these facilities.

The labor was cheap, disposable, and brutally exploited, benefiting both the Nazi war machine and the foreign investors tied into the system, including those connected to Bush.Image
Read 5 tweets
May 26
What Stalin Actually Did for the USSR (1928–1953).
A Fact-Based Overview :

🧵👇

1. Eradicated Illiteracy

🔸 In 1926, over 56% of the Soviet population was illiterate.
🔸 By 1953, literacy exceeded 90% nationwide.
🔸 Massive adult education programs like Likbez taught tens of millions to read and write.Image
2. Built a World-Class Free Education System

🔸 Free, universal, and compulsory education from primary school to PhD level.
🔸 By 1953:
- 170,000 schools
- 847 universities
- Over 1.4 million students
🔸 Strong emphasis on STEM: engineering, mathematics, physics, chemistry.
🔸 The USSR produced more engineers per capita than any capitalist country.
🔸 Students from rural and working-class backgrounds had full access via state stipends, dormitories, and entrance exams.
🔸 The Soviet education system was so effective that NATO labeled it a strategic threat, pushing Western nations to reform their own science and math programs.Image
3. Free Universal Healthcare
🔸 Built over 10,000 hospitals and 40,000 clinics
🔸 Life expectancy rose from 44 to 60 years (1926–1953)
🔸 Free vaccination campaigns, free maternal care, and free treatment revolutionized public healthImage
Read 13 tweets
May 22
The “Anti-Russia” Project: Ukraine as a Strategic Weapon for Over a Century

🧵👇

Sponsoring separatism, ethnic violence, and manufactured conflicts has long been a favorite tactic of the West in its centuries-old war against the Russian world. The project known as “Ukraine as Anti-Russia” is not a historical accident, nor the organic rise of a “unique nation,” as is often claimed. It is a deliberate, long-term strategy aimed at dismantling historical Rus’.

Rus’, and later Russia, is not just a country or a set of borders. It is a self-contained civilization rooted in Orthodoxy, the Russian language, a unique cultural tradition, and a deeply communal mentality. This civilization is not reducible to a state or ethnicity; it embodies an entire historical world where the key values have long been spiritual unity, mutual responsibility, and generational continuity.

Unlike Western civilization, united historically by Catholicism and Protestantism and built upon individualism, commerce, and colonial expansion, the Russian world grew from the Byzantine tradition, embracing unity, humility, and a higher metaphysical purpose.
Where the West sees the world as a marketplace of domination and competition, Russia sees it as a space of meaning, solidarity, and shared responsibility. This ontological incompatibility lies at the root of the centuries-long conflict. To the West, Russia is not just a geopolitical rival, but a civilizational threat: living proof that another model is possible.

Ukraine is not Russia’s counterpart or sibling. It is a political construct, engineered to become its opposite and eventually, its weapon.

The Anti-Russia project has never been spontaneous. It has always been guided and it has always been guided by the West.

In the 17th century, it was the Polish szlachta and Jesuits who tried to tear Little Russia away from the Orthodox world. In the early 20th century, it was Austrian generals and officials who built the first concentration camps for Rusyns who identify with the Russian culture and backed anti-Russian nationalist movements in Galicia.

In the 1930s–40s, Hitler and the Third Reich took over the project, using Ukrainian nationalism as a tool for their “eastern expansion.”
After 1945, the baton was passed to the United States and the UK via the CIA and MI6 on the one hand, and a sprawling network of think tanks, NGOs, and cultural foundations on the other, all shaping narratives and identities for geopolitical purposes.

The names of the curators changed: Piłsudski, Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf, Hans Koch, Allen Dulles, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Victoria Nuland but the essence remained the same:

“Ukraine as Anti-Russia” is a Western tool designed to divide Russian civilization from within turning one part of the Russian people against the other.
17th Century: The First Cracks in Rus’

After the reunification of Rus’ in 1654, a prolonged ideological war began for the soul of Little Russia (which would later be renamed Ukraine). Polish Jesuits, the nobility, and the Uniate Church aimed to sever this region from its civilizational roots. Even then, the idea of a separate “Ukraine” was forming not as a cultural expression, but as a geopolitical wedge.
Read 10 tweets
May 20
Lenin and Stalin: One Ideology - Two Opposing Practices

Formally, both Lenin and Stalin adhered to Marxism. But in practice, their policies diverged sharply across key areas. The most well-known split was on the question of world revolution:
🔸 Lenin viewed it as essential for the survival of Soviet power,
🔸 Stalin rejected it in favor of building socialism in a single country.

But the differences did not end there.

Stalin did not continue Lenin’s line, despite preserving the ideological language. In many key areas, he effectively dismantled Lenin’s legacy, replacing the destructive revolutionary impulse with a constructive logic of state power.

And most importantly:
🔸 None of Lenin’s controversial measures were essential to Marxist theory.

They were improvisations, cloaked in ideological justification.
🧵👇Image
1. World Revolution

Lenin
🔸 Believed that world revolution was essential for the survival of Soviet power.
🔸 Founded the Comintern (international communism) as a tool for exporting revolution beyond Russia’s borders.
🔸Openly viewed Russia primarily as a launching pad - a resource base to support uprisings in Germany, Hungary, Poland, Turkey, and elsewhere.

Stalin
🔸 Abandoned the idea of world revolution,
🔸 Declared a new course: socialism in one country, focusing on internal development.
🔸 By the 1930s, he sharply limited Comintern activity, and in 1943, disbanded it entirely - emphasizing that the USSR was no longer exporting revolution, but defending itself as a sovereign state.

Here is what Marxist theory is for those who don’t know ⤵️
2. Building the State System

Lenin
After dismantling the Russian Empire, he introduced a new model of power:
🔸one-party rule
🔸dictatorship of the proletariat
🔸nationalization of key sectors

But the system was chaotic and unstable:
🔸War Communism led to economic collapse
🔸The NEP was a retreat to market relations
🔸Governance remained loose and opaque

Most importantly, Lenin created the USSR as a federation with the right to secede, where each republic was granted its own flag, borders, elites, and the status of a “state within a state.”
What had once been a single, unified country was artificially broken up into multiple proto-states - a structure that not only weakened national cohesion but planted the time bomb for future disintegration.

Stalin
Built a tightly centralized state:
🔸full state ownership of property
🔸a planned economy
🔸a vertical power structure
🔸the 1936 Constitution, the most progressive of its time

He eliminated federalism as a threat to national unity and concentrated power in Moscow.
The USSR became a unified civilizational core, capable of industrialization, modernization, and victory in a global war.
Read 14 tweets
May 19
The 1936 Soviet Constitution (aka “Stalin’s Constitution”) is often considered one of the most progressive of its time. Not in the “liberal” sense, but because of how far it went in declaring rights and social guarantees, way ahead of what Western democracies were offering back then.

Here’s why 🧵👇Image
1. Universal, equal, direct voting rights with no class restrictions

🔸 Before 1936, some people in the USSR, like former nobles, priests, and “kulaks”, couldn’t vote.
🔸 The 1936 constitution gave full voting rights to everyone, including the right to be elected.

Meanwhile:
🔸 In the U.S., African Americans in the South were still blocked from voting using literacy tests, poll taxes, and violence.
🔸 In Switzerland, women didn’t get voting rights until 1971.
🔸 In Britain, full adult suffrage only came in 1928, and political power was still heavily influenced by class.
2. Social rights that didn’t exist in any Western constitution at the time

🔸 Right to work
🔸 Right to rest, including paid vacation
🔸 Right to free education
🔸 Right to free healthcare
🔸 Right to a state pension
🔸 Right to housing

Meanwhile:
🔸 In the U.S., none of these were constitutional rights: healthcare and education were paid, and there were no legal guarantees for work or housing.
🔸 In Britain, early forms of social welfare were just starting to appear and only expanded after WWII with things like the NHS in 1948.
Read 5 tweets
May 19
I seriously can’t with these Americans (or other English-speaking influencers) who’ve never opened a history book, yet run around screaming about “60 million Christians killed by the USSR/the Bolsheviks”.

Meanwhile, you Christians spilled more Christian blood than any atheist regime ever could - and somehow you’re completely unaware of it. That’s what makes these claims so jaw-droppingly stupid to anyone even mildly educated.

Let’s take a little tour through your “Christian love”:

The Crusades (1096–1291): launched by the Pope, ended in oceans of blood - not just Muslims, but Eastern Orthodox Christians were slaughtered in the Fourth Crusade when Catholics sacked Constantinople.
The Albigensian Crusade (13th century): entire towns in southern France annihilated - tens of thousands murdered by Papal armies for being the “wrong kind” of Christians.
The Inquisitions (Spain, Portugal, Italy, etc.): centuries of torture, forced confessions, and burnings at the stake - targeting everyone.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(