Some good old-fashioned blood libel-ing from the New York Times.
This is a masterclass of dishonest, agenda-driven journalism, even for the Times.
Let's break down the disinformation, and some of the authors' questionable resumés 🧵
Firstly, the headline — which is all 90% of readers ever see before scrolling past — states as fact that Israel opened fire on hungry Palestinians.
But buried in the article is the qualifier that the deaths were “according to Gazan health officials” — meaning Hamas.
And here, they call the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation “Israeli-backed” — even though it’s backed by the U.S. as well, and is chaired by an American.
Why? To frame it as a sinister Israeli plot to murder Palestinians.
The authors claim the UN hasn’t found evidence of Hamas diverting aid.
This ignores the overwhelming footage of Hamas gunmen seizing aid trucks, stockpiles found in Hamas warehouses, and confirmations from multiple international observers.
Now here's where it gets really grotesque.
They quote a "freelance journalist" named Mohanad Keshta at several points in the piece.
Here is Mohanad Keshta's Facebook page.
Here’s Mohanad Keshta, on October 7, posting a photo of newly abducted Israeli hostage Dafna Elyakim with the caption: “We missed out — may God bless the one who got it.”
The implication is vile, with clear sexual undertones: he envies the terrorist who took her.
Mohanad Keshta is also quite enthusiastic about a July 4, 2023 terror attack, in which a Palestinian rammed and stabbed civilians in Tel Aviv—killing a pregnant woman's unborn baby and injuring nine.
Now to the NYT journalists behind the piece.
The lead author — presumably, since her byline comes first — has written for Al Jazeera, worked with the PFLP-linked group Forensic Architecture, and spent nearly 2.5 years at Airwars.
Airwars are amateurs at best, and Hamas shills at worst.
I mean, this is pathetic stuff. Some "investigators" they are.
Clash Report, the Turkish psyop that half of political Twitter treats as gospel, had 49,200 followers within 20 hours of its very first tweet.
The account — a major source of disinformation and bogus conspiracy theories — is botted as hell. And I can prove it 🧵
The account was created in May 2015 but was completely dark.
Its first tweet only went up on February 28, 2020 — the night Turkey launched Operation Spring Shield, its massive drone assault on Syrian regime forces in Idlib.
Convenient timing, I'd say 🤔
Less than 24 hours after that first tweet, the Wayback Machine's archived snapshot of the profile shows 49.2K followers.
At the risk of giving it any more airtime, the cartoonishly nonsensical "Israeli dogs rape Palestinians" claim has a source worth naming.
It's the handiwork of Ramy Abdu, head of the Hamas front group called Euro-Med.
Let's once again get to know Ramy 🧵
First of all, Euro-Med has been responsible for some of the most absurdly hysterical lies from Gaza, including the one about Israel "vaporizing" Palestinians into dust
Ramy was designated by Israel as a Hamas operative since 2013, by the way.
He's got familial ties to Hamas as well.
Here's him just last year admitting that his brother-in-law was a senior Hamas terrorist — and a high-ranking UNRWA official.
A new study from Indiana University just analyzed 2,335 YouTube Shorts and 94,000+ video frames from major international news outlets covering the Israel-Hamas war.
The data on media bias is staggering, yet unsurprising 🧵
The study examined 4 state-funded outlets: Al Jazeera, BBC, Deutsche Welle, and TRT World. Together AJ and TRT published over 93% of all content studied — 1,258 Shorts from TRT alone vs. just 68 from BBC. The most prolific outlets are also, as we'll see, the most biased.
Al Jazeera's sentiment toward Israel across an entire year of coverage:
❌ 302 negative
➖ 371 neutral
✅ 19 positive
That's 43.6% negative vs. 2.7% positive. This isn't based on the researchers' opinions, but on computational linguistics applied to thousands of videos.
Been a while since I did a media takedown thread, but given my role in helping put Col. Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya behind bars, I couldn’t help myself 🧵
This to me is the most dishonest part. If you search "Hussam Abu Safiya" and "Hamas" on Google or any LLM, you get a whole bunch of articles meticulously laying out the evidence of Abu Safiya's ties to Hamas.
The author is just flat out lying about there not being evidence.
Then we have the two UN Special Rapporteurs the author cites ad the basis for her article.
One of them, Ben Saul, thinks that Somalia is a leader in human rights and also accepted a $150,000 "donation" (not a bribe!) from the Chinese government
Breaking: I’ve just discovered that next month’s annual Al Jazeera Forum will feature a keynote by Iran’s foreign minister — fresh off his regime slaughtering 43,000 in the streets — alongside Hamas leader Khaled Meshaal.
Let’s take a closer look at this conference, shall we?🧵
On its face, the conference theme sounds like the usual nauseating, sanctimonious, academia-infused soirée one might expect from Doha. But look at the actual lineup, and the mask slips.
Keynote speakers include Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, the president of Somalia, the head of Türkiye’s Directorate of Communications, the director general of Al Jazeera Media Network and a member of Qatar’s ruling family, MEP Rima Hassan and some Chinese government dude