The Muslim Brotherhood is not a traditional movement. It is a political deepfake. Just as a deepfake mimics the surface of a person to deceive, the Muslim Brotherhood mimics the behaviors of democracy such as elections, civil society, and free speech while hiding an entirely different agenda underneath. This thread breaks down how and where this deception operates.
In Tunisia, the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliate Ennahda presented itself as a pro-democracy actor after the Arab Spring. It joined transitional governments and defended pluralism. But internally it stalled judicial reform, resisted equal rights legislation, and shielded clerical networks. A 2023 report from the Tunisian Observatory for Democratic Transition found that Ennahda-linked individuals held 40 percent of key public positions despite only winning 27 percent of the vote.
In the United Kingdom, Muslim Brotherhood-linked organizations such as the Muslim Association of Britain have been cited in UK Parliament reports for hosting extremist speakers while presenting themselves as inclusive community actors. The 2015 UK Government review noted how the Muslim Brotherhood promotes grievance-based narratives while embedding itself in civil institutions using entryist tactics.
In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood’s brief rule from 2012 to 2013 revealed its true intentions. After winning the presidency, it tried to push through a constitution with no national consensus, moved to suppress independent media, and fueled polarization. Khairat al-Shater, the group’s deputy leader, said that democracy was a tool not an end. Once power was secured, the mask fell.
On US campuses, Brotherhood-linked student groups such as Students for Justice in Palestine have faced scrutiny for promoting ideological conformity while silencing dissent. A 2024 report from the Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy recorded over 200 cases of intimidation and disruption tied to these networks under the banner of academic activism.
None of this is accidental. It is part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s long-term strategy. Like a political deepfake, it imitates democratic behavior only enough to gain access and legitimacy. It does not challenge systems head-on. It performs moderation to embed its worldview while gradually hollowing out pluralism from within.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s tactics in Tunisia, the United Kingdom, Egypt, and the United States follow one pattern. Mimic democracy. Embed in institutions. Convert influence into control. It is not dangerous because it is radical on the surface. It is dangerous because it sounds just moderate enough to pass as part of the system until it replaces it entirely.
And that is the true danger of the Muslim Brotherhood. It does not break the system. It learns to speak its language fluently while quietly rewriting its code from within…
(End of the thread)
And that is the true danger of the Muslim Brotherhood. It does not break the system. It learns to speak its language fluently while quietly rewriting its code from within…
(End of the thread)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
