Thread by @justdad7

WPATH can't catch a break. Even though the ACLU agreed to dismiss Boe v Marshall, where it challenged the Alabama law banning medical transition of minors, a federal judge has just ordered that more of the documents WPATH disclosed be made public. /2

Many of the documents produced by WPATH were subject to a protective order and could not be published but the judge ruled that recordings or WPATH and USPATH conferences and panel discussions were not confidential and were not covered by the order. /3
reason.com/volokh/2025/06…

Although WPATH was not a party to the case, the judge ordered it to produce documents relating to its standards of care as they were the basis of the plaintiff's claim that gender affirming treatments were medically necessary. /4justdad7180.substack.com/p/boe-v-marsha…

The documents showed that WPATH had suppressed the publication of most of the systematic reviews it had commissioned to support its standard of care and made a last minute decision to remove recommended minimum ages for treatment as a result of pressure from the US government. /5

We don't know what is in the conference materials but the fact that WPATH is fighting to keep them confidential suggests that they will not help its reputation. The leaked documents reviewed by @_CryMiaRiver in the WPATH files were seriously embarassing.
environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath…

@_CryMiaRiver @threadreaderapp unroll