New study: more evidence of very low human capital in Africa.
Basic numeracy mostly unchanged from 1950 to 1990 birth cohorts, despite much more schooling.
NB: basic numeracy is very, very basic = people know their own age, don't round it up or down (called "age heaping".)
Some exceptions. Basic numeracy in Ghana has trended upwards
In some countries, e.g. Niger, basic numeracy has trended downwards. Yes, numeracy is declining.
(Remember, knowing your own age is so basic that going to school is not necessary to learn how to do it. So, unschooled people can learn it.)
This supports other evidence on low human capital and ineffective schooling.
A 2022 study found that the expected literacy rate after five years of schooling in Africa was only about 50%.
Input (money) into education increased, but output, i.e. literacy, did not.
"We find that little progress in numeracy has been made on average. However, there are strong regional disparities."
Source: Age heaping based numeracy estimates in African regions, 1950–1999: New methodological advances and results
Many people have denied Lynn's national IQ estimates for Africa.
This supports the general conclusion.
And the specific conclusion that national IQ is a bit higher in southern and eastern Africa than in western Africa.
The official and unanimous line of the global managerial elite (once called Davos Man, now called Elite Human Capital) is that the solution to the problem is more money and more schooling in the Third World.
This is strong evidence that they are mistaken.
Further support.
In Ghana, a study used two surveys (2006 and 2017) to estimate basic literacy and numeracy.
Literacy and numeracy declined over the decade.
Despite increased schooling.
Likely explanation: less intelligent kids are going to school.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, once again the challenge: define wokeism!
It's not hard to do.
Finnish scholars have a 7-item scale for assessing wokeness.
It boils down to 2 points: 1. Extreme anti-racism. 2. Extreme transgenderism.
Plus hostility to free speech.
The Finnish scholars also have an 11-item scale of woke attitudes.
It also boils down to two factors: extreme anti-racism and extreme transgenderism, with restricting free speech a weapon.
Anti-woke has to refute extreme anti-racism and transgenderism and support free speech.
Extreme anti-racism is bad because it is anti-white and anti-Western.
Extreme transgenderism is bad because it aims to erase all legal and customary distinctions between males and females.
How well did academia address the rape gang child sex slave issue?
From @knrd_z thread below, looks like: 1. Used scare quotes to imply it is a fake thing. 2. Insinuated Muslims are the real victims.
There should be an inquiry into anti-white racism in academia.
3. Feminists write a vast amount on "rape culture". But faced with a real gang rape and child sex slave culture, they were largely silent.
4. Appears to have been zero or near zero attempt to tell the stories of the survivors.
Huge fail of the vast apparatus of feminist and gender studies academia.
1520-1720 elite human capital became obsessed with religion (and likely high in religiosity) then 200 years later suddenly changed to be less religious.
As shown by density of the words God, Jesus, and Christ (vernacular and Latin) in books.
After 1720, elite human capital becomes much more interested in science (and probably more secular in outlook).
As shown by the prevalence in books of these words: medicine, astronomy, mathematics, geometry, philosophy, hypothesis, logic, experiment (vernacular and Latin)
What caused the post-1720 change?
Probably one man: the genius Newton.
A new generation of elite human capital recognized in his mathematical laws of nature something far more intellectually satisfying than theological doctrines and creeds.