Ann Jacobs Profile picture
Jun 17 10 tweets 2 min read Read on X
A brief 🧵on why the latest conspiracy theory about China sending drivers licenses to Wisconsin to allow for fake absentee voters to cast an absentee ballot is just a whole lot of nonsense and people shouldn't believe any of it. 1/
Now this conspiracy theory assumes that there are nefarious actors who will take a fake ID from China, register to vote online, then request an absentee ballot online, then return it by mail. There is no claim of an army of live people registering with fake ID's. 2/
To vote absentee in WI, you must be registered. To register online, you need a WI DL or ID. The # from that DL/ID is used as a unique identifier for the voter. That information is cross-referenced with Dept. of Transportation basically in real time to confirm their identity. 3/
In other words, there has to be an existing record of a DL/ID on file for the registration to go through. A fake plastic ID from China doesn't create a drivers license record in Wisconsin. Any registration attempted would be rejected. No registration, no ballot. 4/
Since I can already hear the question "what about people with fake ID's registering at the polls and voting?" Well, first off, any ID has to "reasonably resemble" the person registering. So to overcome 20,000+ votes in WI, you would need an army of criminals. Very unlikely. 5/
Additionally, those thousands of criminals would have to go from site to site to try to achieve their goal of 20K+ in votes. The logistics would be mind blowing. AND everyone would have to be silent and not tell anyone. Good luck with that with thousands of people. 6/
And let's say someone did do this? It would be caught when the DL/ID info is entered into WisVote. Suddenly there would be 1,000's of error entries. This has not happened. Obviously. 7/
Here's the real story - Donald Trump won WI in 2016, lost WI in 2020, and won WI in 2024. Each time by around 20K votes or so. Not because of some hairbrained idea about fake ID's from China-because he got more votes, then fewer votes, then more votes than the other candidate.8/
So let's put this ridiculous claim about fake Chinese ID's to rest. It's nonsense.
Please like/share!
Reminder - I block people who call me names.
@threadreaderapp - Please unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ann Jacobs

Ann Jacobs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AnnJacobsMKE

May 16
Happy to report that there is now a Legal Defense Fund set up for Judge Hannah Dugan! It is created in compliance with the Wisconsin Code for Judicial Ethics & Ethics for Public Officials!

hannahdugandefensefund.org
The Fund "will be professionally managed by a separate entity experienced in fund management; its work will be monitored by counsel experienced in professional ethics. [former WI Supreme Ct justice] Janine P. Geske will oversee and serve as a trustee of the fund." 2/
**There are significant limitations on who can give!**
It is clear from the list of people who cannot give that a great deal of thought has gone into the administration of this fund so that any possible conflicts of interest or ethical problems can be avoided. 3/
Read 7 tweets
May 14
When I first saw the complaint against Hannah Dugan, the facts didn't add up and I discussed them at some length. 1/
She has since been indicted under similar claims. Some as spurious as allowing a litigant to appear by zoom (something that happens all the time).
As Judge Sol Wachter said, a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich if asked. 2/ Image
In my earlier analysis, I did not consider the issue of judicial immunity. Judge Dugan's defense team, however, has considered it and filed a well-reasoned motion on the topic. 3/
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Read 6 tweets
Apr 25
Let's discuss the *actual* charges against Judge Hannah Dugan using the Complaint against her.
tl;dr - she sent the man in question into the public hallway where agents there to arrest him watched him walk by and did nothing. 1/
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
¶12 - They had a 6-member task force including one ICE, one CBP, 2 FBI and 2 DEA agents. Whew!
¶10 - because of courthouse security, they knew he would be unarmed.
6 people for one unarmed guy. OK. 2/
Starting at around ¶20 there's a lengthy discussion about Judge Dugan's demeanor - "visibly angry" and "walking quickly." Have they never met a judge? Do you think they like having their calendar messed up? Would the same words have been applied to a male judge? 3/
Read 18 tweets
Mar 29
Why do so many people feel like late-night ballot totals are new (when they are not)? Answer: It has everything to do with the difference between “calling” an election, and having complete totals in. A thread: 1/10
When the margins in a race are very large (1 side is winning by a lot) the press calls the race even though all ballots aren’t accounted for. This frequently happens in states that are ‘red’ or ‘blue.’ For example CA gets called even though it takes them a long time to count.2/10
Sometimes a presidential race is called before WI tallies its votes. Why? Because our 10 electoral votes don’t affect the likely result. Again - this is a “call”, not the actual results. And that’s fine! If we can know who won, great! 3/10
Read 10 tweets
Mar 25
A quick Wisconsin review of Trump’s new executive order:
tl;dr – This does *not* change anything for our upcoming election for Supreme Court on April 1. Here’s why: 1/7
1-State elections are governed by state law, not federal law. The WI Supreme CT race is a state race only (there are no federal elections at all on April 1), so any federal demands do not and cannot affect this race. 2/7
2-the EO focuses on the NVRA (National Voting Rights Act) and purports to require proof of citizenship for those persons using the NVRA form to register to vote. WI is *exempt* from the NVRA. 3/7
Read 8 tweets
Jan 3
Wisconsin voting: A brief update on the 193 City of Madison absentee ballots that were not counted. The WI Elections Commission (WEC) did not learn about these ballots until 12/18/24, long after the election had been certified (on 11/29/24). 1/6
12/19/24, WEC staff asked for a call with the Madison Clerk and City Atty., which occurred on 12/20. WEC asked the clerk for details on how this happened, and a statement was provided by her on 12/23. That statement gave some information, but left many outstanding questions. 2/6
On 12/26, I directed our legal team to prepare a memo on what authority the WEC had to further investigate the matter. That memo indicated that the WEC did have the power to investigate, and I asked that a meeting be scheduled so that the WEC could vote to investigate. 3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(