Alex Vacca Profile picture
Jun 18 13 tweets 4 min read Read on X
BREAKING: MIT just completed the first brain scan study of ChatGPT users & the results are terrifying.

Turns out, AI isn't making us more productive. It's making us cognitively bankrupt.

Here's what 4 months of data revealed:

(hint: we've been measuring productivity all wrong) Image
83.3% of ChatGPT users couldn't quote from essays they wrote minutes earlier.

Let that sink in.

You write something, hit save, and your brain has already forgotten it because ChatGPT did the thinking. Image
Brain scans revealed the damage: neural connections collapsed from 79 to just 42.

That's a 47% reduction in brain connectivity.

If your computer lost half its processing power, you'd call it broken. That's what's happening to ChatGPT users' brains. Image
Teachers didn't know which essays used AI, but they could feel something was wrong.

"Soulless."
"Empty with regard to content."
"Close to perfect language while failing to give personal insights."

The human brain can detect cognitive debt even when it can't name it. Image
Here's the terrifying part: When researchers forced ChatGPT users to write without AI, they performed worse than people who never used AI at all.

It's not just dependency. It's cognitive atrophy.

Like a muscle that's forgotten how to work.
The MIT team used EEG brain scans on 54 participants for 4 months.

They tracked alpha waves (creative processing), beta waves (active thinking), and neural connectivity patterns.

This isn't opinion. It's measurable brain damage from AI overuse.
The productivity paradox nobody talks about:

Yes, ChatGPT makes you 60% faster at completing tasks.

But it reduces the "germane cognitive load" needed for actual learning by 32%.

You're trading long-term brain capacity for short-term speed.
Companies celebrating AI productivity gains are unknowingly creating cognitively weaker teams.

Employees become dependent on tools they can't live without, and less capable of independent thinking.

Many recent studies underscore the same problem, including the one by Microsoft: Image
MIT researchers call this "cognitive debt" - like technical debt, but for your brain.

Every shortcut you take with AI creates interest payments in lost thinking ability.

And just like financial debt, the bill comes due eventually.

But there's good news... Image
Because session 4 of the study revealed something interesting:

People with strong cognitive baselines showed HIGHER neural connectivity when using AI than chronic users.

But chronic AI users forced to work without it? They performed worse than people who never used AI at all.
The solution isn't to ban AI. It's to use it strategically.

The choice is yours:
Build cognitive debt and become an AI dependent.
Or build cognitive strength and become an AI multiplier.

The first brain scan study of AI users just showed us the stakes.

Choose wisely. Image
Thanks for reading!

I'm Alex, COO at ColdIQ. Built a $4.5M ARR business in under 2 years.

Started with two founders doing everything.

Now we're a remote team across 10 countries, helping 200+ businesses scale through outbound systems. Image
RT the first tweet if you found this thread valuable.

Follow me @itsalexvacca for more threads on outbound and GTM strategy, AI-powered sales systems, and how to build profitable businesses that don't depend on you.

I share what worked (and what didn't) in real time.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Vacca

Alex Vacca Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @itsalexvacca

Jul 31
Facebook once bought a VPN app for $120M and turned it into a surveillance tool that spied on 33M+ users' entire phones for years.

This app helped Zuck buy WhatsApp for a whopping $19B and break Snapchat's encryption.

Thread
The name of this Israeli app was Onavo.

It promised to “secure your data” and reduce mobile data usage.

When Facebook bought it in 2013, Zuck said the app would help them connect more people to the internet.

Facebook even promised to keep Onavo running as a standalone brand. Image
But Onavo operated as a VPN that routed all your phone's internet traffic through Facebook's servers before sending it anywhere else.

Facebook could see:

• Every app you opened
• How long you used it
• Which websites you visited
• And at what time you used each app
Read 13 tweets
Jul 24
You know those AI apps that always work? They all use JSON prompts.

Started using the same format for my AI prompts and my outputs became shockingly consistent.

Here's exactly how to write JSON prompts (with code, screenshots, real examples):
What you'll learn in this thread:

→ What JSON is & why LLMs love it
→ Basic JSON prompt structure
→ API modes that guarantee valid output
→ Templates for extraction, generation, analysis
→ Production patterns & error handling
→ Real automation examples

Let's start:
JSON = JavaScript Object Notation

It's just data with labels. Think of it like a form where every field has a name.

Why it works: LLMs are trained on millions of JSON files from APIs and code. It's their native language. Image
Read 23 tweets
Jul 21
AI just made experienced developers 19% SLOWER.

Not faster. SLOWER.

New study: 16 developers, 246 coding tasks, best AI tools available.

Everyone predicted 20-40% productivity boost.

The reality Silicon Valley doesn't want you to see🧵 Image
These weren't random coders. Average 5 years on their specific repositories. 1,500 commits each. Working on codebases with 1.1 million lines of code.

The kind of developers who know their code so well they can navigate it blindfolded.

What happened to them was... unexpected.
Before the experiment started, researchers collected predictions.

- ML experts said 38% faster
- Economics experts said 39% faster
- The developers themselves said 24% faster

They were all wrong. But not in the way you think. Image
Read 15 tweets
Jul 17
BREAKING. An ex-OpenAI engineer published the most revealing insider account of how the $100B AI giant ACTUALLY operates.

They tripled to 3,000 employees in ONE year.
No email. No roadmap. Run entirely on Slack.

Highlights from the most important tech blog of the year: 🧵 Image
The blog is written by Calvin French-Owen, who sold Segment for $3.2B (back in 2011), worked extensively with OpenAI, built Codex, then quit.

He wrote a blog sharing his first-hand experience at OpenAI.

Here's what he revealed: Image
1. One Codex feature burns the same computing power as Segment's entire infrastructure.

Think about that. Segment processed billions of events daily. Thousands of enterprise customers. Massive scale.

At OpenAI? That's a single feature. Not even a main one. Just a "niche" add-on.Image
Read 18 tweets
Jul 14
OpenAI was all set to pay $3B for Windsurf.

So how come Google stole Windsurf for a lesser price ($2.4 billion)?

The actual villain is Microsoft.

How a secret Microsoft clause on OpenAI's IP is helping Google win the AI race: 🧵 Image
Microsoft (OpenAI's biggest investor) has a clause: they get access to any IP that OpenAI acquires.

On the other hand, Microsoft owns GitHub Copilot, which is a direct competitor of Windsurf.

Do you see the problem? Image
Windsurf had built the best "agentic coding" AI - it can write, debug, & fix code autonomously.

Over 1 million developers were using it.

Most importantly: Windsurf had logged interactions from all those developers.

Selling it to OpenAI could've given Microsoft access to all. Image
Read 16 tweets
Jul 10
JUST IN: Grok 4 drops after the wildest 48hrs in the history of X:

- Nazi posts
- CEO resigns
- X Worth $11B less than paid

Musk's now claiming Grok 4 is PhD-level in every subject + scores 45% on impossible tests.

Here's everything Musk revealed at the Grok 4 launch🧵⬇️ Image
1. Grok 4 scored 45% on the "impossible" AI test

Humanity's Last Exam has 2,500 expert questions across 100+ disciplines. GPT-4 gets 3%. Gemini gets 21%.

Grok 4 hit 45% - more than double the previous best. Think PhD-level questions in physics, medicine, philosophy. Image
2. Uses enough electricity to power 300,000 homes

Colossus supercomputer runs at 300 MW.
For comparison, ChatGPT uses about 28 MW.

That's 10x more power for roughly 2x performance.

Environmental groups are already filing complaints about Memphis air quality. Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(